How Do 'Prosperity Gospel'-Preachers Respond to St. Paul's Accusation of Them?

Tweet

Well, it's an inferred accusation of Prosperity-Gospel preachers (like Kenneth & Gloria & John Copeland, Joel & Victoria Osteen (tho Joel has told the Oklahoma Gazette that he doesn't like the ministry being referred to as 'Prosperity Gospel'), Creflo Dollar & various others). St. Paul tells us that 'lack' (one of Brother Kenneth's least-favorite words) is one of the primary means by which Jesus Christ related Himself to humanity (see below), and--prosperity being the polar-opposite of lack--associating The Gospel with Prosperity would be like ... well ... You could see it as something like 'using cow-patties to clean up after your dog,' but you could also compare it to 'making Satan a central character in your teachings of God' (as many churches do). Am I equating 'Prosperity' & 'Satanism'? Well, Satan is the polar-opposite of God; & St. Paul tells us (of God's Son) in Second Corinthians 8:8-15 "I speak not by commandment, but by occasion of the forwardness of others, and to prove the sincerity of your love. For ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich. And herein I give my advice: for this is expedient for you, who have begun before, not only to do, but also to be forward a year ago. Now therefore perform the doing of it; that as there was a readiness to will, so there may be a performance also out of that which ye have. For if there be first a willing mind, it is accepted according to that a man hath, and not according to that he hath not. For I mean not that other men be eased, and ye burdened: But by an equality, that now at this time your abundance may be a supply for their want, that their abundance also may be a supply for your want: that there may be equality: As it is written, He that had gathered much had nothing over; and he that had gathered little had no lack." I admit, I became a 'partner' of Kenneth Copeland Ministries partly just to get a piece of their media empire (though 'being a partner' means only a little more than 'I say I'll pray for `em & let `em send me free stuff'). But St. Paul is telling us here that we don't want Prosperity, we want Equality (or Equanimity ... is that the word?) I.e. The reason for Prosperity is 'to be able to distribute it!' You remember that the first Christians gave EVERYTHING THEY OWNED to the church (upon which time it was ALL distributed back to the members), and that--when a couple had some wealth they didn't report to the church--God took the quickening Spirit from their flesh! I think a system like that should be brought back! Centered on an alliance between the banks & the churches, everything we own should be 'granted us by the grace of the bank/church's not-taking them.' The way it is now, we are granted wealth according to our works. Under the bank/church, we will be granted wealth according to 'the grace given' (ultimately the Flying Spaghetti Monster's grace, but that's all given to Allah, who gives it all to God, who gives it all to humanity to distribute among themselves ) That's the only solution I can see for Prosperity Gospel-ers to stay in agreement with The Word given to St. Paul. Can you see any other solution? (And how many Prosperity Gospel-ers do you think will actually respond HERE?)