Insane left-wing predictions
By grandpa_lash
@grandpa_lash (5225)
Australia
November 6, 2012 7:04pm CST
In light of the voting machine "glitches" I have posted about this morning, perhaps a return to last week's Politics board might be useful.
http://www.mylot.com/w/discussions/2713312.aspx
Obviously Ladybugmagic must be mad lol.
I don't imagine I need to say aything more, now it's back to the right-wing zealots and wing-nuts.
Lash
2 responses
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
7 Nov 12
Doesn't appear like the conspiracy came through on the whole "Bain-Controlled Voting Machines" headline. But that was just a preempt -- a "just in case" thing for a Romney win. "Racism" is always available, too, so there would have been enough outs had it swung Romney's way.
I've been one of the few myLotters to want Obama out while still realizing he was going to win. Glitches and voter intimidation and lengthy lines and Mao-like murals notwithstanding, we don't seem to have fraud in elections widespread enough to effect an election outcome. The only real instance one could cite is the whole "Bush stole 2000" bit, but they leave out the part about the shady recounting practices and the thuggery.
I'll let other folks give analysis of the whole event. And that the rest of the world wants to gloat is also fine. It's ironic, but it's fine. Suffice it to say that, once you break through the Electoral numbers and look at the voting percentages, not much has changed since 2008.
That worries me more than anything.
But congratulations are in order for President Obama. If there's a silver lining, it's that America did avoid a huge months-long mess with recounts and lawsuits and potential riots (emphasis on "potential").
In a way--and I cringe to say this--it's better that an incumbent stayed in than to tarnish American democracy by having half the country think voting is fraudulent across the board.
1 person likes this
@purplealabaster (22091)
• United States
7 Nov 12
Oh no, there are still tons of people spouting about racism, because obviously the only reason that anyone would vote for Obama is because he is black. Oh yeah, and the rest of the people that voted for him are on Welfare.
The racism thing really does not matter, though. Yes, both sides have used it, but if it were two white guys or two black guys (and maybe some day women) that were the primary candidates, then there would be another issue, such as religion, that would be the huge issue.
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
7 Nov 12
I vividly remember in 2008 when major news outlets in America were running with the story that, had there not been so much racism in America, Obama would have won the popular vote by much more. I vividly remember the entirety of the Tea Party being labeled as racist, only in existence to stand against a black man.
I think it matters to the people who are called racists. It matters to people who are actually dealing with racism.
I agree with you that it would be just another issue brought up if it were two people of the same race. It always is. But all I'm saying is that "racism" would have been an out had Obama lost. Every candidate needs an out when losing. Romney has a few, one of which being his Mormonism. If someone chooses not to give that any credence, that's their choice. I personally don't, but it exists since Mormons are a minority and are treated pretty badly by the mainstream.
Any out on the President's end is obviously moot because Obama won. But reality is reality and shouldn't be pooh-poohed as if it's meaningless.
America wouldn't have its first black president anymore; it would have voted out its first black president. If somebody thinks that wouldn't have been a huge deal, well, we'd just have to agree to disagree.
@purplealabaster (22091)
• United States
7 Nov 12
I was not meaning to downplay racism, although I can understand how what I said could be interpreted like that. What I meant was that it really does not matter if it is racism or sexism or religious differences, etc., because there will always be something that will be blamed rather than the person's actual stance on the issues or knowledge or the things that really should matter when one becomes (or does not come) President. Skin tone, gender, and personal religious choices really should not be the deciding factor in who runs our country, but I guess that is just my naive thinking here.
@grandpa_lash (5225)
• Australia
7 Nov 12
Not a whisper from them yet, I imagine they are licking their wounds. But if the vitriol coming from at least one of them over the past couple of days is any indication, one hates to think what they'll be like once they stop crying.
The most useful thing I got out of this was a new rule: in elections, trust the bookmakers, they didn't just get it right, they even got the comfortable margin right.
Lash