Twinkies Go To Court...
By chrystalia
@chrystalia (1208)
Tucson, Arizona
November 20, 2012 1:58am CST
A federal judge has now ordered Hostess to once AGAIN attempt mediation with the Union-- which is part of what put the company in bankruptcy the first time-- so for the moment, Twinkies and Wonder bread will still be around. However, Hostess won't be operating at full capacity, if at all, during the legal process. Hostess was going to sell everything off-- a Mexican company based in Texas, named Grupo Bimbo (now that is an unfortunate name...), was interested in buying, as were Little Debby and Sun Bakery. The union and Hostess will have until Wednesday to come to an agreement before the bankruptcy proceeds.
The union leaders are saying they are confident that the explosion of Twinkies hoarding will work to their advantage, though I can't see why. They have no interest in changing their demands at all, and they have already said they believe half of the workers affected will get jobs with other bakeries. The Judge says he is trying to save the jobs--but realistically, unless the unions compromise and allow changes to their pension, bonuses and pay scale, I can't see a way the company can continue to operate. Stockholders are losing, corporate is losing, and the workers are losing-- and this legal finagling will cost everyone involved money, unnecessarily.
So, Mylotters-- when a union won't compromise, a company can't afford to compromise, and the workers will lose either way, do you think a judge should do as this one has, and halt the bankruptcy with no expectation of success? The judge cannot compel either party to compromise, and in my opinion, should not have intervened at this late stage.
3 people like this
2 responses
@JenInTN (27514)
• United States
22 Nov 12
I saw where the judge was allowing Hostess to close. I think it is a shame that it has come to this. Unions have become quite the parasite where businesses are concerned now. I think that they were much needed when they were created but it has become extreme. I know they are, however, losing strength in these times. Catepillar just had bout with the union and maintained production with the temp employees that they had while the others went on strike. They didn't get in to one bit of trouble and most of the strikers ended up going back to work in a couple of days.
@chrystalia (1208)
• Tucson, Arizona
22 Nov 12
Yep, I saw the mediation had failed-- no surprise there at all. Between the Union, the Corporate execs and the stockholders, Hostess was doomed. I'm still trying to imagine Twinkies made by a company named Bimbo-- I'm not seeing this, think of the commercial problems.
Bimbo Twinkies-- eat them up
Twinkies De Bimbo--sweet eating
Bimbo Twinkies-- dig that cream...
I mean, this would be a marketing nightmare . Hopefully Little Debbie or Sun gets the Twinkies name and recipe (but come to think of it, Bimbo Ho-Hos doesn't work well, either.. Ho Hos by Bimbo? NOPE.)
Companies are going to have more power as unemployment grows, to bust unions. Heck, if our employees had walked out, we wouldn't have taken them back. Trust has to be present to have a good work environment, and I couldn't trust a striker. Those caterpillar workers were fortunate they had a tolerant boss. I would have busted the union, and hired all new help, no matter the cost. Sooner or later employees need to start realizing that the money they spend on union dues would be better off in their pockets, and employers will realize that uniting with the workers, and caring for them properly, will keep unions out.
@mariaperalta (19073)
• Mexico
20 Nov 12
Lets hope the union can work this out with the company. But I saw on cnn, its going to be a hard road.