John 1:10 how do you read this?
By urbandekay
@urbandekay (18278)
November 25, 2012 2:41pm CST
"He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not." KJV
Transliterated directly from Koine Greek gives
"In the world he was, and the world through him was made, and the world did not know him:"
Now it has been suggested to me that this means that man CANNOT come to know Jesus by his own choice, which runs contrary to my own view, by which it only says at that time in the past man DID not know Jesus.
So, perhaps you have another reading or perhaps you hold one of these views?
all the best, urban
2 people like this
17 responses
@livewyre (2450)
•
27 Nov 12
Christians generally accept everything was created 'through' Jesus.
God spoke creation into being 'Let there be light, and there was light' (Gen 1:3). Jesus is called the Word, and there is a connection between the Word being Jesus and the words of creation.
I believe that is why John says 'all things were made through him (Jesus)' John 1:3
This is not an easy thing to understand, but we are of the belief that Jesus, God (the Father) and the Holy Spirit are all aspects of one being.
It is not a perfect analogy, but is similar to the concept that man is Flesh, Spirit and Mind - man is not three separate things, but a combination of the three.
@urbandekay (18278)
•
26 Nov 12
Yes, it is definitely about Jesus
1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 The same was in the beginning with God.
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.
7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.
8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.
9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
all the best, urban
@veganbliss (3895)
• Adelaide, Australia
26 Nov 12
http://bible.cc/john/1-10.htm
I was reading the above commentaries & could not find anything to suggest that man cannot come to know Jesus by his own choice. So you were right to hold such a viewpoint in such regard. I noted that this verse repeats verse three, but adds more detail. I also noted a very interesting point which also supports my view, that being that in the original Greek, the first mention of "him" refers to the light form or the word - in essence, the soul or "inner man" of Jesus, whereas the second mention of "him" is entirely different & refers to the very earthy, male physical form of Jesus the human being.
Do you believe, at this point, in reincarnation, Urban?
I believe it was the soul, the light form, the "inner man" of Jesus which created the universe & that same light form or soul has incarnated in many physical forms (eg, through the prophets) over the generations over the entire course of history of this earth as it chooses. As such, your final view is also encompassed by this.
@urbandekay (18278)
•
26 Nov 12
No, I tend to believe that, "And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgement:"
Are you a Greek Scholar?
all the best, urban
@urbandekay (18278)
•
26 Nov 12
It is clearly written Jesus created the universe John 1:10 and Jesus also states before Abraham, I was
all the best, urban
@samar54 (2454)
• Egypt
26 Nov 12
veganbliss ,
"the "inner man" of Jesus which created the universe"
I don't understand , do you mean that Jesus who created the universe ?
@livewyre (2450)
•
26 Nov 12
Hi Urban
I don't have any problems with a far more 'simple' reading. The context is that this is an introduction to an overview of Christianity, or more specifically exactly who Jesus was. He starts by saying Christ has existed since the beginning of time, moves on to talk about John the Baptist, and then onto Jesus coming into the world. In this context, I believe John is saying 'Jesus, this same person who was present and actively involved in creation, came into the world anonymously'. In fact the NIV uses the phrase 'the world did not recognize him' which I think conveys the meaning more accurately. Verse 11 repeats this concept, he came to that which was his own (creation), but his own (creation ie. man) did not receive him.
Of course it is talking about mankind in general, because it then says 'To all who received him...' (v.12) indicating that there were a few who 'recognized' him.
Whether one can 'find' Jesus without supernatural help is a difficult one because it can start to sound like a chicken and egg discussion crossed with a predestination argument. IE: What if I am ready, but the Holy Spirit is not active in my life, or the Holy Spirit is ready, but I just don't get it at the time?
@livewyre (2450)
•
26 Nov 12
I like to think this is encompassed in the idea of 'grace' in some way - my way of coming to terms with 'predestination' is to see it as though God is outside of time and can dip into any point in our lives. It's not 'interference' if God knows our reaction at any given point, because it is still OUR reaction - wholly controlled by us.
I think the Holy Spirit is aware of our state of mind and is able to speak to us when we are open - the choice is still firmly ours otherwise the whole exercise is worthless in my view. I cannot believe God simply 'chooses' who will follow and who will not, so my thoughts have to go in a different direction. Others obviously are comfortable with that idea and it fits their understanding of God.
It is a two-way relationship, man must humble himself - that is the part that we perform, we can't deserve salvation, once we understand that, I believe we have effectively humbled ourselves.
@urbandekay (18278)
•
26 Nov 12
Indeed, that is the crux of the matter. Calvinists interpret this verse to imply that man can do nothing to come to know Jesus
all the best, urban
@urbandekay (18278)
•
26 Nov 12
"...my way of coming to terms with 'predestination' is to see it as though God is outside of time"
Aye, in this our views are similar
all the best, urban
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
7 Dec 12
How shall they believe unless they hear....Romans 10:14
How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?
Believing is an act of will.
I don't have access to a Koine Greek translation, but perhaps a study on the word KNOW ??
The verse I offered here implies that we must KNOW Jesus by the action of will. Also, is the 'world' meaning mankind, or the natural world meaning 'earth' or 'nature'?
@urbandekay (18278)
•
7 Dec 12
Perhaps like you, I believe that our will is, or can be important in coming to know and as you say in English, understanding how 'know' works clarifies interpretation but, I am informed, in the Greek the tense of the word 'know' is past continuous.
So, a Calvinist might interpret this verse something like
"He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world was unable to know him then or ever."
That may not be an entirely fair statement but it is as I understand at present.
That interpretation the use for argue that only the elect; those that God chooses, can come to God and one saved always saved
all the best, urban
@urbandekay (18278)
•
8 Dec 12
Now I am unsure what you are advocating.
The question revolves around whether or not our own will can play a part in coming to know God?
Your earlier post seemed to support the view it does, your later seems contrary to that view
all the best, urban
@urbandekay (18278)
•
10 Dec 12
"I do support the interpretation that we accept or reject by our will, salvation by the grace of God, by faith in the finished work of Christ. God does however, draw us to Him by the Holy Spirit."
Yes, that is how I see it
all the best, urban
@francesca5 (1344)
•
10 Dec 12
looking at the greek transliterated version, as interpretations are always difficult because we are dependent on what the translator thinks it means. the biggest difference between that and the kjv version is the difference between the world was made by him, and the world was made through him. as if the world was made through him he has a more passive role, whereas if the world was made by him, than he is the creator of the world, and god. which is a common christian interpretation, that jesus was god on earth, which i don't agree with, because if he is then he isn't his son.
so depending on which interpretation you prefer, the concept of whether or not the world knew him, (him, i assume, being jesus), then the world not knowing that the world was made through jesus has a more metaphysical meaning, than the world not knowing that it was made by him, which is more literal.
so the world not knowing that it was made through him offers more interpretative possibilities, in the sense that god must have used jesus to make the world, does it mean make the world from the beginning of time, or make the world in the sense that he changed so much of it, by his presence. then, the concept, to me, of the world not knowing, both becomes harder and easier to interpret. as the world did not know that jesus had made it makes sense, as large numbers of people rejected him, and did not fully understand, that while on earth, jesus was "making" the world as a vessel of god. so if god used jesus to make the world, and the world didn't know, then to me it makes sense that way.
so its not, in my view, about an individuals relationship with jesus, or god, but about the world's collective relationship with jesus, which was to not really understand what he was doing.
now i've confused myself, but it is interesting.
@urbandekay (18278)
•
10 Dec 12
Thank you, I found your comment insightful if a little off topic
all the best, urban
@urbandekay (18278)
•
11 Dec 12
So I did, then it is my fault for not being clearer in my post. I was struggling to ask the question without pre=loading it too much. It was really a question about Calvinism and Arminianism
all the best, urban
@francesca5 (1344)
•
10 Dec 12
off topic? you asked for my interpretation. i don't agree that it is about the individual experience of god, its about the collective experience.
@StLouisMetroTutoring (678)
• St. Peters, Missouri
25 Nov 12
I think I agree with you urban. I've never heard it translated to meaning that we can't come to know Jesus (although I'm far from a scholar on the subject). I think it would reference to the past, but I also believe it speaks about today. Just as in the past, some people do know Jesus. But many others do not. And just like in the past, Jesus is with us today. Just not in the same form as in the past. I think it also refers to today and the many people who say there is no evidence that Jesus/God exists. But the fact is, the evidence is all around us. In the world.
@livewyre (2450)
•
26 Nov 12
That's a very good point St Louis - the same is true today, we have all the evidence we need, far more than ever was available in Biblical times, yet mankind as a species refuses to recognise or acknowledge Christ.
Even if you leave God out of the equation, we know that this man Jesus existed and was crucified by the Romans, yet most people don't see the need to ask the question 'Who was this Jesus?' If they did, they would surely discover God.
@salonga (27775)
• Philippines
27 Nov 12
He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not." (John 1:10)
It simply means the Lord Jesus is co-creator with God the father. And He live in this world. He assumed the role of man for the very purpose that He wanted to save mankind from the doom of hell but the world (the people) did not recognize and refuse to recognize his deity, and His saving grace.
John 6:44 is the verse that says "No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day."
- Man by his own choice simply deny God, because man is sinful in nature and would not by himself seek God but God is good and still provides way for salvation by drawing us unto the Savior. As Matthew Henry commented "The gospel finds none willing to be saved in the humbling, holy manner, made known therein; but God draws with his word and the Holy Ghost; and man's duty is to hear and learn; that is to say, to receive the grace offered, and consent to the promise."
@urbandekay (18278)
•
27 Nov 12
So you think that man's choice does not play a part in the matter?
all the best, urban
1 person likes this
@salonga (27775)
• Philippines
28 Nov 12
No dear don't misunderstood. Man's choice still plays a part and that is when we choose to come or not to come whenever God draws us near to the Savior. It is just that we can't be the first to move near to Jesus all by ourselves. We don't have that innate tendency. We need God to move us first. And after the moving of God, our choice to obey or not to obey follows.
@bellis716 (4799)
• United States
28 Nov 12
It means simply that the majority of the people in the world did not know Jesus as the soon of God. The majority of the people in the world today still do not know Him.
@urbandekay (18278)
•
28 Nov 12
Samar... read it from the beginning, I quote it in previous discussion it is undeniable about Jesus
all the best, urban
@urbandekay (18278)
•
12 Dec 12
The truth remains the truth, whether or not you know it
all the best, urban
@urbandekay (18278)
•
27 Nov 12
It is one used by Calvinists to support the doctrine, may not be the best one but I intend to deal with them one at a time.
all the best, urban
@voracious (624)
• Philippines
30 Nov 12
Even with or without the support of other verses, it's very vague to understand that particular verse.
"He was in the world" - meaning he came from here.
"The world was made by him" - God created the world.
"The world knew him not" - God is a spirit, cannot be seen by our naked eyes so majority cannot acknowledged his existence.
@iuliuxd (4453)
• Romania
27 Nov 12
I think that verse was written to make fun of Jehova`s witnesses because the way i read it is that our Creator came on Earth as Jesus Christ.
To answer your question i think it is a combination between individual effort and God`s grace.Or sometimes only God`s grace but individual effort is never enough to know God, no matter how many times you read that book.
@urbandekay (18278)
•
27 Nov 12
Our views on this then are the same but I do not understand the reference to Jehova's Witnesses?
all the best, urban
@superlativicious (51)
• Philippines
26 Nov 12
i have a question, what i know is that Jesus is the son of God so, it means that there is higher power than Jesus. i have viewed some of the response of this discussion, and mentioned Jesus as the creator?? i think God the creator is really different from Jesus the son of God.
@urbandekay (18278)
•
26 Nov 12
Please remain on topic, which is about the interpretation of John 1:10
John 1:1-3 should answer your question
all the best, urban
@arreolabryan (856)
• Philippines
25 Nov 12
He created the world and when the time he was here no one believed in him.
@mythociate (21432)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
25 Nov 12
That passage---it's kind of a Mobius-strip (a strip of paper taped to form a loop after twisting it & taping the edge of the flipped-side to the edge of the non-flipped side, so that the loop has no inside-side nor outside-side ... if you 'tell people about it,' they still won't know what you're talking about---unless they know what a Mobius-strip is ...)
But as for 'how you can know Jesus': I look at it more the way G-d was said to 'create' the things of the universe---by 'letting them be.' If you just 'let Jesus be Jesus,' you can say you "know" Jesus.