America-- The Party Plan

Tucson, Arizona
November 27, 2012 12:48am CST
Well, I toddled off to: cpusa.org to see what the reaction to the election is there-- and yes, they are celebrating, as well they should be! Their position has been vindicated, endorsed by a majority of Americans, and they are moving Forward-- of course. They've only been waiting to implement their platform since about 1963... But it has finally paid off-- and now we move Forward, as a nation. I know this website will be shocking and offensive to a lot of people--but it is worth reading. After all, as the article says-- Defeat for the right, Victory for the People and Democracy. PRAVDA! Truth! The American right is corrupt, exploitative and a burden on the people, as we all know; racist, sexist, divisive. The time has come to move away from all this, to move Forward, and work to fulfill the mandate of the people, the worker's class. Do enjoy reading this informative site, and as always, I welcome your comments. This has been a public service announcement. The views expressed in this announcement do not necessarily reflect the views of this station
2 people like this
3 responses
• United States
29 Nov 12
Oh ugh. Sounds a whole lot like what we read about Christians vs. the lions, or whomever is attacking them for the momemt! I am all for freedom of speech, yada, yada, but I try to refrain from speech that is inflammatory and just downright hateful. I disagree with the socialist democratic view that their way of running the country is the only way and that they speak so negatively about the right wing. Our country has enough issues to find solutions to that if both parties would bury the hatchet at the root of some of the problems instead of in each other's backs, we might be able to improve some of the weakness in society.
• Tucson, Arizona
29 Nov 12
As I said-- it was a public service announcement Yep, the communists are alive, well, in America--and disguising themselves in other parties...The rhetoric is amazing, I will cheerfully admit. And it sounds very familiar--though we are used to hearing it slightly toned down, from different voices. I'm all for freedom of speech, myself-- I'm currently polishing a discussion on the first Amendment, in all its glory--but I agree, they are over the top at cpusa. But people listen, believe and act (not that they understand the consequences) so the rest of us have to know what we are dealing with. You don't keep the weasels out of the chicken coop by ignoring their existence...
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
1 Dec 12
The communists and the Nazis were of the same ilk. Massive government promising utopia to the masses. Man throwing aside God and His blessings, for a government/rulers who merely promise to bless. I agree, the idolatry will end only when the LORD returns. Trouble is, HE will judge righteously and our understanding of 'social justice' will do us no good.
@Rigel4 (47)
• United States
28 Nov 12
I've been to CPUSA.com many times. It's a good party and I don't know of many young people who would have problems with it. Those old people who lived through the Cold War may have issues with it because they may associate it with Russia and Stalin. The Communist Party of the USA, I agree with, but they are another small party among the many in the United States. I'm personally a member of the Green Party who's ideals aren't far from the CPUSA Perhaps if many of the progressive 3rd parties could come together to create a larger "progressive party" then those who really care about our future and consider themselves global citizens will have a chance at having a truly progressive president.
• Tucson, Arizona
28 Nov 12
As one of those "old people", I will say this-- I have no issues with any form of responsible government-- that works. Once you have lived history, and also studied a lot of history from all sides, you see that these "progressive" ideas--don't work. And we old folks do care about our future--far more than the young. You have never been "old"--on the other hand, we were young once. We have a sense of both maturity and perspective that most young people don't by virtue of our wider experience base. We have seen what works, and what doesn't. One of the advantages of growing older is learning to see the long term consequences of actions, be they legal, political, environmental, religious. While a lot of old folks still make mistakes, our mistakes are different then those we made as young folks--because we learned, and grew. When you are young, and you don't have a lot of past experience to base things on, you also don't think forward as well as when you are older, you don't look as hard at what the consequences of your actions today will be on your life ten years, twenty years down the road-- it isn't "important". You live much more in the "now" than in the "future"--and your vision of the future is what you would like it to be--which, a few years down the road, usually turns out to be inaccurate. The men who founded this country--who sought independence from Great Britain, who fought battles in courts of law and public opinion, and on the streets and in the forests of the eastern U.S., were largely old folks. The men who wrote our Declaration, read it aloud, wrote our Constitution, were also old folks for their time, and many lived to what are still advanced ages. And they built something special, that has lasted quite a while now. It's far from perfect, but until relatively recently--about 1969-1970-- for the most part it worked. Not without problems, not without pain, not without injustice-- but it worked. What CPUSA and other parties like it promote has never worked, anywhere, for anywhere near as long as this has--and in the short time it has "worked" places-- it hasn't worked well. People who care about the future in reality, take something that is already built and works OK, and work together in practical ways to make it work better. Tearing it down to build something that doesn't work is like a child, tearing apart a functional toy, and ending up trying to rebuild it--which doesn't work well.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
30 Nov 12
I've heard some 'young' folks who have come here from Stalinist Russia and communist ruled China and they warn that Americans don't know what they're asking for.
@mehale (2200)
• United States
27 Nov 12
Personally, both the article and the website as a whole sent a cold chill down my spine. Socialism and/ or communism is not, nor ever has been the solution to our nation's problems...That would defeat the democratic system as a whole and make us mere servants to whomever is so lucky as to be in power. I sincerely hope that this party looses steam and its dreams for America come to an end....their America is not one that I would want my children to have to live in.
• Tucson, Arizona
27 Nov 12
well, if you compare the cpusa platform to the platform of a certain other party--which shall remain nameless--you might be surprised at the similar, and in cases identical, rhetoric and agenda. These guys have been working on this openly, since 1963-- and they are not exaggerating when they say their people deserve some kudos for the way things are going. While they are on occasion nutballs, you might also want to check out www.nationalreview.com They have a columnist named stanley kurtz who is worth reading, on occasion. He's not as much of a right wing nutball as most, and usually has his facts straight. cpusa is a website I check on regularly, due to some of their union and ACORN affiliations-- like you, I prefer not having too many of them in office, nor do I want one in the highest office. Unfortunately, they also have a habit of switching their party affiliation when they run for higher offices--so they can get elected to them. That is the disturbing part of the whole party, is their willingness to and eagerness to hide their agenda within our mainstream parties. You should find the website disturbing--any right minded American would. The problem is most Americans don't even know it's THERE. They see cpusa candidates on every ballot, and don't even think to wonder "what is this cpusa--maybe I should check it out". Thanks for replying, by the way. My discussions tend to get politely ignored until someone decides to take a closer look-- and I don't write a discussion unless I feel something should be seen...I think they call this tacit censorship