Who has more of a right?

The way I see it, all our rights stop immediately before they infringe on someone else's rights. Using that philosophy, if the smoker can smoke without infringing on anyone's rights, he's free to smoke. On the other hand, if his smoke infringes on someone else's right to breathe clean air, his right to smoke has stopped.

I believe that the non smoker has a right. Being that I am a non smoker, I would not want to go around and be around smoke when I don't choose to smoke. I care about my health and why should have to have my health in danger from when I go into public places and have to be around other people's smoke who enjoys to smoke and are putting their health in danger. I say okay, yes, you have the right to put your health in danger and that is your choice, but don't make my choice for me, I choose not to smoke and I can have the same danger from just the second hand smoke that you bring around me.

I feel that everyone is entitled to have a clean air to breath wherever he is. And so I say that the smokers should give respect to those non-smokers.

there are smoking areas, may it be in private or public places, a special place is provided for that, and in that place where smokers are allowed to smoke, they have the right to smoke in those places. i am not a smoker. but i respect peoples' right to smoke, but only on designated areas.

I feel like the non-smoker has more of the right because the non-smoker is choosing to not put the smoke into there lungs. Which they should be respected in that area. Especially kids. Smokers are making that life decision with there addiction. I think only being able to smoke in certain areas is a good idea. If a non smoker decides to be around it then it is their choice they cant blame the smoker.