Its taken me a while to think so much about dowry..

@vandana7 (100526)
India
January 5, 2013 1:35pm CST
First the justification... Dowry was offered for upkeep of daughter. It formed the girl's share in her parents' property. Somewhere along the road came Indian constitution that denied the girl a right in HUF properties and ancestral properties, as a result, what was given to the girl differed from her share..generally the bridegroom managed to get an amount equivalent to the girl's share in ancestral properties. Why should girl get her share before the boy or boys get their share? The girl remains at her in-laws place, and over a period the boy's family becomes the whole and sole care giver for his parents. It is therefore, not unnatural for parents to feel overly obliged to their sons and their daughters in law. This may lead to reduction in the girl's share. Now, one way to tackle it would be to let the girls look after the parents. Another way to do this would be to divide the asset into the number of children plus parents part on the day the girl gets married. The girl would have no access to it, nor would brother, or sister in law or girl's in laws. This property is the girl's share and she is entitled to cash it only in adversity like husband being seriously ill or child being seriously ill or she herself being seriously ill - provided she and her husband have no monies in their hand. Parent of the girl may also cash it if they are seriously ill and have no monies in their hand as of date, having spent away their share. However, any such entitlement the parents would have would be restricted to interest or income from such identified share of the girl's property. A regular settlement or partition deed can help in creating such new class of asset. Now, if the fortunes of the girl's parents increase after the girl's departure, then the parents can, if they so desire to put their children at the same level, write their share of the property to the girl, in part or whole. Alternately, they may keep on adding annually to the initial share of the girl. The law should legalize dowry as share of the girl in her parent's earnings and ancestors' earnings. Your call...and suggestions to end dowry system in India...
2 people like this
5 responses
@ElicBxn (63638)
• United States
6 Jan 13
I think the idea of the Native Americans is better, prove that a young man can support a wife before marriage. Basically, buying the girl from her parents. India and other middle Eastern countries with dowries see a lot of abuse of women because of it, even murdering a woman because of the dowry. This is just WRONG. There should be NO dowry system. Again, I look the the Native Americans when I see that a husband moves into a wife's clan or community. The Navajoes have a great rule where the man never speaks to his mother-in-law. Also, uncles do most of the disciplining, so there's never a case where parent's physically abuse their kids. In the Pueblo culture, the youngest daughter inherits the ancestral pueblo because she is generally the last child at home and have taken care of her parents. Of course, when parents live to much closer to 100 than 40, you have to consider different systems a bit. Still, I think India needs to totally rethink the dowry system and eliminate it.
1 person likes this
@vandana7 (100526)
• India
6 Jan 13
We the women in India are in catch 22 situation. The population size has increased the cost of living (which even today is lower than in Western countries). Consequently, it is necessary for women to join the work force. What is happening is women are more studious and basically inclined to be more sincere with their education. Therefore, they get jobs far more easily, especially those of nurses, call center executives, teachers, etc. This has created immense amount of resentment in the hearts of men who have not bothered to study and learn English and math. They find themselves unemployed at the right age, and like the young recruits in terrorists groups in Pakistan, these guys join political bigwigs as field workers. Obviously their resentment surfaces somewhere, and the political bigwig tries to cover it all up as otherwise, some other secrets may be out in open. At the other end, increasing dowries have scared people so much that they dont want a girl child. Not only do people have to educate the child, but also find her a groom who is equally if not higher educated than her so that there is no arrogance on the part of the girl. This increases the dowry amount as doctors and engineers who earn well, and have some monies behind them demand more dowry..not directly, through their parents. lol. Education is a must because we never know when fate would make the girl helpless. Working too is a must. However, public molestations, kidnapping for trafficking and gang rapes have become so common out here, that people are opting to drop female foetuses. You mentioned killing of bride...we have cruelest ways of doing that. Any girl who thwarts the advances of the guys gets punished with acid throwing and sodomy and gang rape. How do we come out of this? I dont see any hope at least for another century and a half as people are not letting education penetrate in villages.
2 people like this
@ElicBxn (63638)
• United States
6 Jan 13
I agree that its a cultural thing that exists in India and Pakistan and some other parts of the middle East. That doesn't make it right. I think the time may be coming where women may be considered a persecuted minority from those countries and be able to escape the violence. Like China, post 1 child rules, marriageable women in these countries may start becoming in short supply. That, actually, would be a good thing, since then they will become more highly prized.
@vandana7 (100526)
• India
6 Jan 13
In China there is some law, and some law enforcement. In India, there is no such thing. The gang rapists in the present case are from regions where the ratio of girls to boys is 8 for every 10. You would think that would make them more venerable. But no. Boys and their family members do not want to part with monies to get a bride. They also do not want to compromise on dowry that the boy would normally fetch. In this scenario, when they do not get a bride, they are sexually frustrating, and resorting to stag parties in which they drink and then start molesting or harassing girls. Quite often, the political leaders are involved.
@speakeasy (4171)
• United States
6 Jan 13
Dowry has caused more problems for Indian men and women than anything other than the caste system. No one male or female should have to buy a spouse. If you do buy a spouse, you never know if he cares more for you or for your dowry, And when they spend the dowry and want more - many Indian women have been killed so that the man could marry someone else and get a NEW dowry. And, who says that children deserve or are entitled to a share of their parents possessions! The should expect to be supported while they are children. But, when they grow up and are adults they should expect to get our and EARN their own possessions. The only time they should receive or expect to receive their parents possessions is AFTER their parents die and then only in the amount that the parents decide to give them - if their parents spend it all before they die or decide to give it to charity THAT is the parents RIGHT. They earned it not the children!
@vandana7 (100526)
• India
7 Jan 13
I agree to the last bit. However, out here, ancestral properties, i.e., properties belonging to ancestors devolve upon children and from them to grandchildren and so on. That is how things go.. speakeasy...there is one more issue here. In the western world, there is a social security system. What happens is the government monitors that. In the absence of it, people invest in properties called land, homes, gold, lot of land, etc. The idea is to earn some regular income, and periodically liquidate as per the needs. Inflation rate being high (dont trust those single digit numbers that are shown to you on paper, even by the RBI - actual inflation during the past 5 years has almost been closer to 15 percent compounded with upward bias, while they are saying it is averaging near 9 percent). There is a grain of truth though..inflation in food items has been terrifically high, while that in soaps, paints, crockery, cutlerly, and such products has been low. But we need to spend more on food, right? So an average person feels a greater impact of the inflation, while those people in whose budget the expense on food is less than half do not feel the impact of inflation as badly. We have no social security ...so the focus on real estate and gold is more. Demand being more, and supply being less, obviously prices increase. Then come the tax issues. Taxman would question from where you got that much money to buy real estate? So to send the taxman away the document shows less than the actual value even though the actual value is paid. Effectively black is created. I am presuming that tax personnel who comes to check the house is honest. If not, some bribe goes his way also, and they take more bribe. It is often better to pay the tax than to bribe these guys. Anyway returning to the topic, self acquired property may be willed to anybody. But if that is done, the parent may be left on the streets with nobody who will look after him or them. There are no state sponsored old age homes where all the required facilities are there. In any event, parents would like to socialize instead of being cordoned off into some old age home in some remote village where their own children do not visit them. There is a sense of loneliness and what shall I say, feeling of dispensability which prompts them to continue living with kids. They are too old to make new friends in most cases. Children tend to think ...we didnt ask parents to bring us into the world so we are not obliged to look after them. In any event, we are having it tough making two ends meet, how can we spare and so on. Fair enough. The going is tough. So if they look after their parents, they want to be rewarded for it. After all, parents would have paid charges in the old age home, wouldnt they? That is how it comes about...
@vandana7 (100526)
• India
7 Jan 13
Out here it is the male children that are given the responsibility of the parents, which I think is not a well thought out solution because mother and father are more likely to feel closer to the daughter to fetch water or get themselves cleaned in case of any fracture or other things, than with daughter in law. But that is how it is in the religion, and once it is sanctified by religion, even god cant alter that. As to pension..quite a few people do not have pension. People with pension are better off - slightly. They are kept alive because of that pension at the end of every month. Otherwise, they too would have been ill treated. Those who do not get pension try to invest in homes so that get regular income in form of rentals which increase at regular interval so that inflation is covered. It is this property that kids eye and want. Of course the really rich have it different way. They give mansions and cars and kilos of gold and shares...and even art work and antiques as dowry. lol
• Philippines
7 Jan 13
On the last bit, I don't know but in my country, it is considered quite shameful if somebody doesn't take take of their elderly (especially their parents)without very good reason. usually it is the youngest child or the youngest female child you takes upon shirtsleeves to make sure that the parents are comfortable. they are even instances when they are included in the household. Like my grandfather,he lives with me in my mother's house and he has his pension. that pension is collected by his other daughter who spends it for his likes(food, medicine, the works) and he keeps the rest for his discretion. Perish, we feel it more like a duty rather but I cannot rule out that kind of scenario.
@artemeis (4194)
• China
6 Jan 13
I have to say that along with the women in your country I do not doubt the eager good intentions to either abolish or modify the unhealthy dowry practices where modify would be my preferred choice. I don't think such unhealthy tradition will ever be abolished or modified. It is cultural and the entire country is actually practicing it even to this day. I don't actually support that the dowry tradition be completely abolished mainly because it represent what the Indian tradition is all about and it gives Indians their unique identity. Dowry is necessary when it is about helping the newly weds towards independence living giving them the necessary head-start in matrimony. Sometimes, I wonder why and how the modern Indian community have not considered "investing" the dowry amount in the form of endowment insurance which young couples can have an ideal sizable amount to start their new life together. It could also come in the form of a living policy where at the monies will be made available at a certain stage of their married life. In our Chinese culture, our dowries are similar to your bride money where it is observed to thank the girls' parents for their efforts in raising up their daughters by their prospective husbands. The parents upon receiving the gifts will return a portion of it back as an act of respect and understanding that they (parents) are not selling their daughters. The returning of dowry will be quite similar to your bride's dowry. It does not really constitute or considered to be some considerable amount. Chinese couples will need to contribute equally as far as living conditions are concerned. So in this sense, dowry is not impractical or unacceptable. However, I learn that your country is trying to prevent dowry deaths or otherwise known as dowry killings. Somehow, I think India has not done enough to ensure such unorthodox traditions are removed through the use of tougher laws and punishments. Such acts are callous and compliance simply show the hypocritical side of the modern educated minds. The country needs to educate en-mass and uncompromising with stubborn traditionalists which tarnishes the true spirit of humanity and respect of womenfolks in India.
@vandana7 (100526)
• India
6 Jan 13
Dowry was never the Indian culture or tradition. It is a custom we imported from the middle east, when Mumbai was given as gift to the British Crown. Traditionally, in Hindus, it is swayamvar...meaning the girl selects the bridegroom based on the qualities she wants in her husband. Amongst the muslims here, there was the Mehr, which is something that their religion requires them to give to indicate that he can maintain the bride. I am actually not fine with anything being paid by the girl's parents. This is humiliating. The girl goes to her in-laws place, works, cooks, does everything including bringing the children into world, and looking after aged people. Each of the woman's services, if valued in monetary terms are huge. If the girl is being married, that itself is a huge huge huge gift from the girl's parents to the boy's parents. How can they then ask for monies, lands, homes, gadgets, vehicles, jewelry, clothes, etc.? What more, the asking process continues for quite a few years.
• India
6 Jan 13
Vandana I congratulate you for starting this discussion, i belong to the goldsmith caste, i am basically from Chatisgad ,settled in Orissa, the dowry system is prevalent here not only in our caste but all castes. in the past i have arranged meetings of our Swarnakar Samaj to remove this 'demanded dowry'; because many girls remained unmarried; i was surprised to see, the people who talked high were the ones who demanded maximum while marrying their sons, but gave nothing to daughters.
@vandana7 (100526)
• India
6 Jan 13
Yes...somehow the son bias is there..parents want to give to the son, but deny the daughters, and sons in law too look at the girls as money fetching person. Neither wanted here, nor wanted there, even if she earns she risks gang rape...where to from here for the Indian woman?
• Philippines
7 Jan 13
I don’t know about your culture and country but we kinda have a similar thing going in here. It is quite tradition in my province (at least) that the two parties (the families of the groom and bride) do a consultation wherein they would discuss the arrangements for the wedding. The bride’s family usually doesn’t have to pay the groom for the girl’s upkeep but they are willing to share the cost or provide people for the wedding. After the wedding, it’s the decision between the couple how to manage their lives. Of course, they could ask for loans from-laws but they are expected to be on their own. There is even a special dance where people who want to chip in with money. If the parents cannot afford it, the couple might invite some wealthy sponsors to their wedding. Sponsors can give money as gifts for their start-up. I’m sorry but in the situation you have presented the girl is ib=n definitely disadvantage. She cannot hold her own property in her name and she cannot even inherit it – only if she gets married and I would guess to a right man worthy of her station (or family’s). I believe if my parents die (hopefully not soon and in a very distant future), I will automatically inherit half of their estate along with my sibling. I don’t have to get married at all. That is what my understanding of inheritance law in my country (and I have to pay tax. Does your country have inheritance laws? especially for women? P.s. I watched somewhere that some wives choose to gift their daughter a gold ring or something every year and that will serve as her dowry if she gets married. I cannot confirm this though.