Is "group think" the problem with our country?

United States
January 8, 2013 12:22pm CST
Over the holiday I was forced to drive my wife's SUV numerous times, which forced me to listen to over the air radio. I usually listen to sports talk, but there were mostly useless games on I didn't care about. So, without my Sirius to keep me company, I had to listen to over-the-air right wing hate radio. While scanning the channels I came to some pretty funny conclusions: The topics were all the same, the host were using the same talking points, their views were far right, and everyone all agreed 100%. If I had just came to this country, I would think that everyone in this country had some pretty extreme views, but they all agreed with those views. Now, I don't listen to left wing radio, because I don't need people to tell me what to think, and all of this group think just leads people to think less (which I feel is a problem in this country). I am sure that the left wing sites are just as extreme, and agree with each other just as much. Do think think that this one-sided "group think" is what is hurting this country? And, do you think that limiting yourself to one side of an argument hurts your over all grasp of the challenges our country faces?
1 person likes this
9 responses
@burrito88 (2774)
• United States
8 Jan 13
I tend to listen to sports talk radio or local news stations. Most of the politcal talk radio is to the far right and most of those people never admit to being wrong. Moderates, or heaven forbid, liberals are now considered to be communists by the right wingers. I don't think there is any liberal radio anymore now that Air America went off the air. Why can't there be some moderate talk show hosts? (I apologize for swearing. I should have said progressives instead of using the 'L' word.)
2 people like this
• United States
8 Jan 13
Everyone has their own view of seeing things. When you bring more people from D.C. and more special interest groups in the mix, it usually makes it harder to get things done. Even people in the Republican party cant agree on everything. Our politians are more worried about keeping their job then actually getting work done and keeping our country great. I personally think that it is usually a good thing to bring more people to the table and bring everything to the table. I have learned alot more when we have more people disscussing the issue. Of course everyone isn't going to agree on every issue. But usually, the best laws are the ones come from comprimise. People in congress should vote to their own beliefs, not on the beliefs of the party.
• United States
9 Jan 13
I agree that they are not as worried about the people they represent. I wouldn't say they are more worried about their job, I would say they are more worried about their pocket book. Many of them leave congress to make "real money" (I would be more than happy to make $100,000 a year, but their insane benefits, not to mention their pension). I agree that with your compromise thought. It doesn't always work, but it has a much better track record than the laws brought from one party rule.
1 person likes this
• United States
9 Jan 13
I can't bring myself to listen talk radio. But I know a lot of people that do. I like you find it too one sided. Since I don't agree with either side I find it very annoying to listen to. But most of the people I know that do listen or hard core republicans or democrats so they do agree which is why they listen.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
11 Jan 13
I think a big problem is that many don't want to step outside their comfort zone. I for one listen to PBS and NPR when I am able. I don't listen to Rush Limbaugh, but I do listen to Laura Ingram and Mark Levin on our local talk radio. In short, I mix it up. Get both sides, then make up my mind. I find that callers to shows like Alan Colmes (a liberal on FOX Radio) are less inclined to differ with the host. Conservative callers ask more questions and sometimes differ with the host (more often than liberals)
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
11 Jan 13
And I'd like to know when it became 'hate' and 'extreme' to advocate for limited government, lower taxes, family values, and following the Constitution? YOUR OPINION is that it is hateful and extreme. Half the country feels differently than you. I hear and read threats of murder, rape and dragging conservativers behind trucks from liberals regularly on twitter and FB, doesn't that make THEM haters and extreme?
• United States
11 Jan 13
Deb, the difference, as you point out, is that when you listen to Alan Colmes it is based on a right wing station. They expect to hear their gospel, when they don't hear it, they call in and question what they are saying because it isn't what the hear the rest of the day. This isn't a bad thing that you hear different things, and it is good that you listen to other sources. How often to you hear the same talking points on all of the shows (either right winger, or liberal)? When I scan through the shows I the right winger talking about the same thing. Now it might be the same way with the liberals, but their isn't other options on over the air radio. By the way, as part of your second response, I know that Alan Colmes has been threatened on his show by conservatives. I also know that I have been threatened by conservatives when I used to go into the chat rooms. This doesn't defend the hate radio that you are speaking of, and it should be stopped, and the people called out for their actions. But, I refer to right wing hate radio because I notice a more pointed, one sided out look on right wing radio that uses hate to push it's point. You are not told to complain to your congressmen, you are told you should THREATEN your congressmen. How many times have you heard right wingers spew hate that you hear on right wing radio? I have talked to many true conservatives, who have noticed this change in the last 10 years, and have made it a point to show republicans how they are controlled by the hate.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
11 Jan 13
But what YOU fail to point out is the hate from the liberal side. Do some research on tweets and FB posts and responses. One example: http://twitchy.com/2012/08/18/jon-lovitz-treated-to-another-round-of-liberal-hate-after-criticizing-obama/ I don't deny, conservatives can be hateful just like liberals. I see derogatory posts about Michelle Obama on FB and twitter, and sometimes I even respond with a 'what does that accomplish'. I've even given credit where credit is due concerning our president... What I cannot abide is your ONLY pointing out the 'right winger' as hateful. You and I are both opinionated people. We cuss each other on a regular basis and call one another names too. But neither one of us post threats to kill one another on here. I wonder though what would be said if we were followers of one another on FB or twitter? Since you obviously infer that it is 'right wingers' only who do this, you are not telling the entire story here and contributing to the problem we are seeing in the public political forum. As for Alan Colmes and other liberals on FOX, there have been instances where an argument erupted between the liberal and the conservative about an issue but Chris Matthews, Bill Maher, and others of the left winger sort take the cake for hateful rhetoric against conservatives.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
27 Jan 13
Group think is a liberal problem. Some examples: everyone who disagrees with him is a hater and racist. even the blacks who disagree with him are racist when they do so. It is progressive liberals who, for the most part, put people in boxes and tell them what is acceptable thinking and what is not. Kinda like telling someone who has an opposing opinion and debates with you on it, that they need a GPS to find reality. Huh?
• United States
8 Jan 13
There's group think in every party. One side thinks one way is right and vice versa. Although this is something that's not going to happen anytime soon, but all sides of the spectrum of politics should be able to work out differences and come to just one side. Everyone has points to prove, bridges to cross and gold stars to place by their names on boards. I'm a hard core liberal and I'm very passionate to my beliefs in government. Time after time there have been many discussions regarding politics on this site and I stick with arguments with independents & hard core conservatives. Some are nice and civil, while others can be cold and hateful. At the end of the day, I realize they are people, just like me with different views. I can't hate them because of what they believe, but I fight for their rights to say them.
1 person likes this
@eagletrek2 (5499)
• Kingston, New York
9 Jan 13
Hi for me when I drive I do not listen to talk radio I look for a good country music Or 80 music. OK have nice day.
@robspeakman (1700)
9 Jan 13
Group Think is not a new concept or one that is unique to your country... People are IDIOTS and a waste of space, lets not beat about the bush here. We herd around opinions like brainless livestock. We are ill informed and judge the world on knee jerks and whatever the loudest voice tells us to believe and think. Do you think it is funny and quite revealing that the a church congregation is referred to as a flock? Baa Baa. When a person is STUPID it is easier to join the masses, far easier than actually getting to know and understand the person who has a different GOD or who has a different skin colour. The masses exist in all countries and thats the way the powers that be like it to be. Because if we thought and researched for ourselves the World would be a peaceful place. Whilst the right wing tell the idiots how awful and evil Islam is, do you not think that Islamic leaders are also telling their idiots how awful the West is?
@theoana (97)
• Romania
9 Jan 13
I don't know exactly where you live, and I believe this is of no big importance when it comes to the subject:MEDIA. Media is paid by big people with a lot of power in order to promote certain ideas and views. The purpose is to integrate the ideas into our brains-to brainwash for the most part.