Supreme Court to Hear Case of Multiple Social Security Numbers

Congress is supposed to verify that the person running is eligible. That means the right age or older and a natural born citizen. I was so upset with the election of Obama when there was a question of his citizenship because if he was not a citizen his election would set a precedent that might allow anyone of foreign birth to be elected. Congress should have examined and put all these issues to rest before the nomination. They certainly attacked McCain on his citizenship and gnawed at that until his citizenship was verified beyond doubt. They refused to examine the many issues that were raised about candidate Obama and thus were derelict in their constitutional duties. They should all be fired, sent home in disgrace as traitors to the country and tried for willful treason.

Congress does not verify the eligibility of a candidate. That is where the rub is, and why nothing can be done. States must verify before their primary. Several states did try and liberal judges did not cooperate. I believe AZ and FL were two of them. There were 11 that questioned his birth certificate: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41858252/ns/politics-more_politics/t/states-question-obama-citizenship-legislation/ HI sent this to AZ: [i]On May 22, 2012, after more than six weeks of wrangling over the legal authority of Arizona’s request, the Hawaii Department of Health did produce a “Verification of Birth” which at first glance appears to answer Mr. Bennett’s original forgery question. Arizona Secretary of State Bennett March 30, 2012 letter asked Hawaii health officials the following: “Please verify that the attached copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama is a true and accurate representation of the original record in your files.” The May 22, 2012 Hawaii “Verification of Birth”, signed by Hawaii State Registrar Onaka, includes the following statement: “I verify that the information in the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama that you attached with your request matches the original record in our file”. During a forgery investigation, certifying, “information matches” does not address the central and entirely separate issue of a whether a suspicious document is a true copy of an original document. The question remains if a forgery can contain information similar or even identical to that contained in an authentic document, yet still be a forgery.[/i] Read more: http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/freedom-press-not-free/2012/may/24/hawaii-state-registrar-onaka-birth-certificate-/#ixzz2Hc9vNXyC Follow us: @wtcommunities on Twitter

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14583 In this case, the Democrat Party was responsible for vetting and certifying Barack Hussein Obama as legally eligible to seek the Oval Office. The U.S. Constitution has only three very specific requirements for the job. The proper legal text used on the DNC Party “Official Certification of Nomination” document reads as follows, and I quote; “THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 through 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.” Nancy Pelosi signed that document and it was notarized, but it was never sent out to the fifty states. The “Official Certification of Nomination” that was presented by the DNC in all fifty states for the 2008 Presidential election, in which Barack Hussein Obama became the new President of the United States, was almost identical, and it too was signed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson, dated August 28, 2008. But this version of the document was missing the following text, and I quote; “- and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.” The legal certification text on the DNC certified nomination document used for the DNC ticket was limited to, and I quote; “THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 through 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively: That is why it is so difficult to get a judge to hear any case against Barack Obama. How hard is it to make sure a Democrat is assigned the case? It is not for lack of evidence at all.

It's important that our president be a natural born citizen because then, presumably, he or she will have the best interests of the nation at heart. Imagine if we could elect someone from Saudi Arabia as president--he or she could shut down all our drilling operations and make us totally dependent on foreign oil. I'm pretty sure that's the reasoning behind the requirement that the president should be a natural born citizen.