Seven calls from the same salesman in a day

China
April 10, 2013 8:47pm CST
Have you once received several calls from one person who you don't know in a day?Yesterday,I received a call from a salesman who tried to asked me to use their products.I told him that i had no need for their product,but he seemed not to believe me,and after holding off he called me again.I had to told him once again that I had no need.I think I had expressed my thoughts clearly,but he seemed no to give up.I didn't know what he thought,but I received his call for the third time,so I said to him,"I am a little busy,and I have to deal with many businesses." After lunch,I receive three calls from him,and it bought me some bad feeling,so I asked him not to call me any more.He said sorry. However, when I thought it was over,the seventh call from him attacked my evening life.When I returned my home,he called me again,asking me whether I needed his company's products,I told him angrily,"I will never need your company's prducts!"
1 person likes this
4 responses
@williamjisir (22819)
• China
1 May 13
It is really annoying to have calls from a saleman for seven times a day. It bothers us a lot to have calls like this. I hope that he would never bother you again like this, but I am wondering how come he got your phone number. It is a problem. It is important for us not to let out our privacy so that we won't get bothered by people like this.
@jaiho2009 (39141)
• Philippines
11 Apr 13
That's really annoying. Imagine seven times after telling him your reason. Though we understand that the agent only did his job- but calling the same person for seven times sounds odd.
@MoonGypsy (4606)
• United States
11 Apr 13
i think what happened is that they just didn't take you off their call list.
11 Apr 13
clearly that salesman didn't know how to read customer's idea of not having any interest from his products he's been selling, probably he needed badly the sales how odd to receive series of calls with the same person that will surely put also my anger, being persistent here is not applicable