President Obama's Budget hidden items
By bobmnu
@bobmnu (8157)
United States
April 16, 2013 11:31am CST
It seems that President Obama has a provision in his budget that puts a cap on how much you can accumulate in a retirement account. The amount seems very high, $3 million, but remember these retirement accounts were set up so people would not be a burden on society. Now most people are not going to have that amount in their retirement accounts so it won't effect me right. Wrong all you have to do is look at history. The income tax was first established to tax income above a certain amount (only the very rich). During the campaign of 2008 the definition of the very rich was millionaires and billionaires, then it became the top 1% then those making over $250,000 a year then the top 5% (those making over $176,000). In one example a Chicago Police Captain and his wife a Chicago Public School Teacher were making over $180,000 a year. Not people we would consider super rich or even rich.
There have been some liberal experts who have suggested that the government take over all public and private pension plans as a way to balance Social Security and see that everyone has a a secure retirement. This could be done by steps with the first step being that to have a tax free status you must have a certain percent of Government bonds then slowly increase that amount to almost 100%. This way the government would be controlling the accounts and then could offer to take over the account with a fixed rate of return for life.
Is this a different approach to this old plan or is President Obama simply punishing people who work hard and save so that jobs can be produced?
4 responses
@bestboy19 (5478)
• United States
17 Apr 13
What Obama is trying to do is steal from everyone so we all will be dependent on the government. That way, the people lose their power over the government. It would no longer be, "Of the people, by the people, and for the people."
@stealthy (8181)
• United States
16 Apr 13
Just like Obamacare which has all kinds of tax increases and not just on the rich not matter what ones definition might be. Obama and his liberal buddies want everyone dependent on the government because that their voter base is people who depend on the government for almost everything. Of course eventually that leads to a country where no one works and there is nothing left to find the government but the liberals don't see that; all they see is it gives them power and gets them elected.
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
16 Apr 13
I am not worried about President Obama's budget considering his last budget proposal was pretty much a unanimous flop.
The problem with that plan is that no one wants bonds. No one would put their retirement into to bonds. The interest rates are basically zero. Low interest savings accounts make more money than bonds do at this moment.
Federal interest rates are zero. As long as they stay this low (and it doesn't seem likely that the interest rate will raise anytime soon unless Bernake retires), then the plan is a bust from the outset.
However, this is a prime example of exactly how unfair government actually is when it comes to its citizens.
@veganbliss (3895)
• Adelaide, Australia
16 Apr 13
So it's happening to you too? Sounds like a worldwide conspiracy to me! The amount here is even smaller... just $100k that has up until now been tax-free will now be taxed! I reckon it was the government in Cyprus that started all of this.