Error on the bible.
By wapewe
@wapewe (173)
April 17, 2013 5:23am CST
Since the bible have some of authors, it's make some differentiation when writing down "the word of God".
These errors, usually happen when verses told about something.
Don't know whether these errors from the authors when they wrote down "the word of God" (maybe some of them based on hearsay from other not heard directly from Jesus) or from the Jesus himself.
Do you ever notice about them?
8 responses
@Hopefull90 (921)
• United States
17 Apr 13
Where does it talk about horns on Moses as the verse I looked up didn't mention horns at all. This is the first time I have ever heard this description used. I have read that there are 101 contradictions. Some that were listed I could tell were listed because of the ignorance of the one who was suppose to have found them. According to Joseph Smith, I understand that there are suppose to be 400 errors. The ones I bothered to look up didn't change the way I worshiped God so it doesn't matter to me about the supposed mistakes.
@murkie (1103)
• Philippines
18 Apr 13
if you notice earlier depictions-pictures, sculptures- of moses, he is shown as someone having horns. when they finally realized this error of st.jerome in his translations, they removed the horns. look it up in old art. you'll see what i'm talking about.
i am not a mormon (you mentioned joseph smith), and even if i am, i would know that the bible is just a collection of stories authored by so many writers and compiled same as aesop's fables or arabian nights, or canterbury tales.
@john: hell is subjective too. 
@Hopefull90 (921)
• United States
18 Apr 13
Hell has been changed to mean where there is fire but the original meaning is the grave where everybody is for the moment until Christ returns. When God pour down fire upon the wicked hell will be thrown in with it meaning there will be no more graves after the earth has been cleansed (Rev. 20:14.
@wapewe (173)
•
27 Apr 13
Read these geneology from two Gospel
Mathew 1:2-16 (2 Abraham was the father of Isaac, Isaac the father of Jacob, Jacob the father of Judah and
his brothers, 3 Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was
Tamar, Perez the father of Hezron, Hezron the father of Ram, 4 Ram the father of Amminadab, Amminadab the father of
Nahshon, Nahshon the father of Salmon, 5 Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab, Boaz the father of Obed, whose
mother was Ruth, Obed the father of Jesse, 6 and Jesse the father of King David. David was the father of Solomon,
whose mother had been Uriah’s
wife, 7 Solomon the father of Rehoboam, Rehoboam the father of Abijah, Abijah the father of Asa, 8 Asa the father of Jehoshaphat, Jehoshaphat the father of
Jehoram, Jehoram the father of Uzziah, 9 Uzziah the father of Jotham, Jotham the father of Ahaz, Ahaz the father of Hezekiah, 10 Hezekiah the father of Manasseh, Manasseh the father of Amon, Amon the father of Josiah, 11 and Josiah the father of Jeconiah[c] and his brothers at the time of the exile to Babylon. 12 After the exile to Babylon: Jeconiah was the father of
Shealtiel, Shealtiel the father of
Zerubbabel, 13 Zerubbabel the father of Abihud, Abihud the father of Eliakim, Eliakim the father of Azor, 14 Azor the father of Zadok, Zadok the father of Akim, Akim the father of Elihud, 15 Elihud the father of Eleazar, Eleazar the father of Matthan, Matthan the father of Jacob, 16 and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary,
and Mary was the mother of
Jesus who is called the Messiah.)
Luke 3:23-38 (23 Now Jesus himself was about thirty years old when he began
his ministry. He was the son, so
it was thought, of Joseph, the son of Heli, 24 the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, the son of Melki, the son of Jannai, the son of
Joseph, 25 the son of Mattathias, the son of Amos, the son of Nahum, the son of
Esli, the son of Naggai, 26 the son of Maath, the son of Mattathias, the son
of Semein, the son of Josek, the son of
Joda, 27 the son of Joanan, the son of Rhesa, the son of Zerubbabel, the son
of Shealtiel, the son of Neri, 28 the son of Melki, the son of Addi, the son of
Cosam, the son of Elmadam, the son of
Er, 29 the son of Joshua, the son of Eliezer, the son of Jorim, the son of
Matthat, the son of Levi, 30 the son of Simeon, the son of Judah, the son of
Joseph, the son of Jonam, the son of
Eliakim, 31 the son of Melea, the son of Menna, the son of Mattatha, the son of
Nathan, the son of David, 32 the son of Jesse, the son of Obed, the son of
Boaz, the son of Salmon,[a] the son of Nahshon, 33 the son of Amminadab, the son of Ram,[b] the son of Hezron, the son of
Perez, the son of Judah, 34 the son of Jacob, the son of Isaac, the son of
Abraham, the son of Terah, the son of
Nahor, 35 the son of Serug, the son of Reu, the son of Peleg, the son of
Eber, the son of Shelah, 36 the son of Cainan, the son of Arphaxad, the son of
Shem, the son of Noah, the son of
Lamech, 37 the son of Methuselah, the son of Enoch, the son of Jared, the son of
Mahalalel, the son of Kenan, 38 the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of
Adam, the son of God.) ;
I don't know what its call, an error or what?
@dlr297 (5409)
• United States
27 Apr 13
I see no error at all......NO mistake at all
Matthew describes Joseph's descendants.... Remember the seed of Joseph did not get Mary pregnant...(But that is the way it was done back then)
And since Jesus was born of the virgin Mary, according to Jewish law They needed proof that Jesus was the rightful descendant of David and qualify to sit on the throne......
When Joseph married Mary he became the son of Heli by marriage (today he would be called his son-in-law) So the descendants listed in Luke are Mary's. (Mary's ancestry is given in her husband's name.)That is the way it was done back then....
Their is no record that Mary had any brothers to inherit her fathers rights, and possessions. So because Joseph was the Husband of Mary he became the heir to Heli.
Both genealogies had to be recorded to establish Christ's right to rule on David's throne. Joseph's genealogy shows that Christ was a legal descendant of Jeconiah and thus legally could not sit on the throne of David in the nation Judah by inheriting the right solely through Joseph.
Further, the genealogies prove the virgin birth: The curse on Jeconiah's line would have passed on to Christ if He were Joseph's natural son, but He was not—He was the Son of God the Father, begotten by the Holy Spirit.
Jesus was Mary's son descended from Nathan. Jesus can inherit rule over Judah because of Mary's marriage to Joseph, whose genealogy shows he was Heli's son, by marrage
Is their anything else that you think is a error or mistake.... The Holy Bible is the word of God..their are no errors or mistakes in it.......................
@murkie (1103)
• Philippines
17 Apr 13
hello. in addition to rog's response, we should be reminded that the original text used in the bible is not english. somewhere sometime, these texts were translated into a language understood by a certain group. and these translations were not that perfect since there are so many interpretations on a certain verse. take for exampke the 'horned moses' when it actually meant two rays of light emanating from his forehead.
@wapewe (173)
•
21 Apr 13
How about these verses?
I Kings 7:26 (It was a handbreadth [d] in thickness, and its rim was like the rim of a cup, like a lily
blossom. It held two thousand baths.) and II
Chron 4:5 (It was a handbreadth [e] in thickness, and its rim was like the rim of a cup, like a lily
blossom. It held three thousand baths.)
@JohnRok1 (2051)
•
24 May 13
@wapewe Come on, you know I've already answered this elsewhere. The literal translation of II Chron 4:5 is "It RECEIVED and held three thousand bäths", that is, it could, when filled to the brim, hold three thousand bäths, whereas that of 1 Kings 7:26 is simply "It held two thousand bäths", that is, in everyday use it contained two thousand bäths The two passages are talking about different things.
@robspeakman (1700)
•
17 Apr 13
The word of God?
Well I would sa.....
Nah, I can't be bothered to reply to this type of naivity.
@Bentilo_Dalutag (37)
• Philippines
18 Apr 13
The word of God is perfect, there's no error about it... only the interpretations of the people who changes it... that is why there is a false teacher its because of their interpretations... =)beware..............
@rog0322 (2829)
• Cagayan De Oro, Philippines
17 Apr 13
Hi,
There shall be errors in every place if one look for it. This is not a perfect world and imperfections do abound, it only take a critical and observant mind to spot them. However, if one is bent on looking for perfection, he shall end up in disappointment and bitterness. It is better to make out what can be found to be good out of the bad things we encounter in our daily life, it can produce miracles in my experience.
