It Takes TWO
By TexanTornado
@TexanTornado (5573)
United States
August 31, 2015 9:33am CST
Have you ever heard the expression, 'It takes two to tango?'
I am a firm believer that in any relationship that both parties need to give 50%. Things should always go both ways. That it is a two way street, if you will. If one is constantly taking without given, then the giver will eventually wising up (or you would hope so) and simply quit given.
This goes for marriages, partnerships, friendships, and even in this wonderful online community in which we call 'mylot'.
If you want to continue taking, then you have to learn to give a little in return.
17 people like this
19 responses
@topffer (42156)
• France
31 Aug 15
Although it is easily understandable, we have not a similar expression in French. It is true that any relationship/partnership/friendship has to work in both side to last long. At myLot the slogan of the old musketeers would be better : "One for all and all for one".
3 people like this
@topffer (42156)
• France
31 Aug 15
@TexanTornado It does not exist. If I say in French "We need to be two for a tango" people will understand, but it is not a proverb/common expression, and we have not any similar proverb/expression that I know.
I am a great fan of Alexandre Dumas, but "One for all and all for one" has not been created by him for the 3 Musketeers but only popularized. It is today the official motto of Switzerland and should be adopted as a motto at myLot.
2 people like this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
31 Aug 15
What is the expression in french? Or can you not post it? Yes, any lasting relationship, each sides need to do their part, regardless of what type of relationship it is or trying to build. Oh I like that saying, basically taken from the 3 Musketeers, but rings so true here.
2 people like this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
31 Aug 15
@topffer Oh ok, it might be an expression of the states, all I know is I have heard it all my life. I never looked it up to see.
Yes, I would say the saying was popularized by the 3 Musketeers. I have to agree with you on the adoption of the phrase by mylot.
2 people like this
@rusty2rusty (6763)
• Defiance, Ohio
31 Aug 15
I agree. A relationship in any way is a two way street. I do thing it should be 50/50. I understand sometimes the numbers can change depending on circumstances. Such as someone becomes ill or disabled. I believe a relationship is to make the other person happy and not yourself. Once people start to realize that. You will see both partners giving 100% or more of themselves tot he other.
2 people like this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
31 Aug 15
Oh no doubt, that the ratio can change from time to time. As you brushed upon, circumstances can change it. I was more or less saying, one person giving 90% all the time, while the other barely gives the 10%. I was always taught, to give is to receive, and I try to always do my best in following that logic.
2 people like this
@rusty2rusty (6763)
• Defiance, Ohio
31 Aug 15
@TexanTornado I use to give 100% to my estranged husband. Looking back on things I believe he never gave 50%. I was blinded by what I thought was love. When he shot and disabled me, he pretty much stopped doing what a husband and a father should have. I couldn't work at the time. Ultimately it split us up.
2 people like this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
31 Aug 15
@rusty2rusty Ok, wait a minute. Let me see if I read this correctly. Your estranged husband shot you??? And you being unable to work split ya'll up? Ok, maybe I missing something or reading it wrong, but I would think him shooting you would have done that on it's own.
2 people like this
@Rosekitty (19368)
• San Marcos, Texas
31 Aug 15
Always believe in that too of course the 100% like Michael said but understand your 50/50!
Some will turn out that way and some will do whatever their husband say they should do and for that i feel that isn't a marriage but ownership of someone..
2 people like this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
31 Aug 15
Yes, the 100% sounds better. I was simply trying to say the both parties should give their equal share.
You hit the nail on the head. I'm not one to take orders, I guess that is why I don't work outside my house. Speaking of which, a guy my hubby works with once asked him, "Who wears the pants in your house?" My hubby replied, "I do, but my wife sets them out for me." Before you take that wrong, he was simply implying, he doesn't do anything without my input.
3 people like this
@Rosekitty (19368)
• San Marcos, Texas
1 Sep 15
@TexanTornado and that is the best way to answer that person..i probably would have been a bit sarcastic to that person..hahah
2 people like this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Sep 15
@Rosekitty Being that he works in an office where they thrive on friendly interaction, he rather just be subtle with his sarcasm.
1 person likes this
@rosekiss (30414)
• Eugene, Oregon
1 Sep 15
When I was married, it seemed like I was giving and he was taking.He was so manipulative, and I hated that, as he would always tell me what to do,amd I didn't like it as I felt used and violated, and it seems like he just wasn't into the marriage, hence we divorced after 35 years. Life is great now, and I know it will only get better.
2 people like this
@rosekiss (30414)
• Eugene, Oregon
1 Sep 15
@TexanTornado I wasn't happy about getting a divorce at first, but now that I look back on it, it was the best thing that could have happened. I am free of all the manipulation.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Sep 15
@rosekiss Oh I can understand that. Hind sight is always a good thing. I think for most people a lot of things are noticed when it comes to hind sight. I am just glad to know that you are happy and content now.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Sep 15
There are quiet a few that have been where you were. Some wising up and get out and others don't. The ones that don't there is a word for them, 'doormat'. I'm glad you are free and enjoying life. We should never have to 'settle', we should be able to get what we want and be happy in our choices and in life.
1 person likes this
@purplealabaster (22091)
• United States
1 Sep 15
I agree that overall each person should equally contribute to a relationship. However, there are times when one person will have to support or carry the other person and vice versa, especially when one person is better at something than the other. Knowing each other's strengths and weaknesses and working together or giving up "control" of a certain aspect to "take the reins" in another area is also an important part of the relationship as well.
2 people like this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Sep 15
Ah yes, you mean compromising. Which eventually leads to the give and take and I think each person should give just as much as they take. Maybe not in every single thing but in the things they excel at, making it not all one sided.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Sep 15
@purplealabaster Yes, and that is the way that it should be. I am a firm believer in that.
1 person likes this
@sofssu (23662)
•
1 Sep 15
There are times either of us go overboard.. but there are times we don't do much.. but then we add up to the same.. I am fine with that equation too. I am with you on what you say.. 50% each makes a whole 100%
This equation is not just for marriages but in anything that needs cooperation and working together. I am with you all the way.. on this line of thought.
Now, now don't back out on me .. you have to give a lot in return.. remember 100% or 50%
2 people like this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Sep 15
Well, I am glad someone finally understands my ratios. I am well aware that we should give 100% of ourselves to most anything to make it the best we can, but I was going for equals.
Oh I am feeling lazy today, so how about I give 49% and you give 51%??
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Sep 15
@sofssu Awww aren't you sweet. Oh really? It seems I am still waiting for my share of the $$.
@kaka135 (14931)
• Malaysia
1 Sep 15
I agree with "it takes two", but I also disagree with the percentage. I actually think it doesn't really matter who is giving more or less, but both parties are giving. Or I should say, we just can't or do not measure how much we are giving in a relationship.
I understand what you mean, but it's just that when you wrote the percentage, it may create some disagreements.
1 person likes this
@kaka135 (14931)
• Malaysia
2 Sep 15
@TexanTornado That's good. Yes, I have read your comments on others, and I think you are making a good point too.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Sep 15
Yes, you have a point as long as both parties are giving. However, I like my percentages, they make sense to me, and I did manage to get my point across. So I am content.
1 person likes this
@swissheart (6482)
• Romania
1 Oct 15
a relationship in order to work and be as healthy as possible definitely takes two people
1 person likes this
@swissheart (6482)
• Romania
1 Oct 15
@TexanTornado but what should you do if the other ceases putting the same amount of effort to make that relationship work?
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Oct 15
@swissheart I would say it would be time to find a new partner.
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Oct 15
That has always been my perspective on the matter, so yes, I would have to agree with you.
@SIMPLYD (90722)
• Philippines
3 Sep 15
I so agree my friend with @PhredWreck , that it should be 100% for each of the two .
1 person likes this
@rebelann (112878)
• El Paso, Texas
31 Aug 15
Yep, you can't expect to constantly take without giving ..... but I actually have met one person who'd rather give although what she gives is food and all too often no one wants to eat, not that the food is bad just that no one is hungry.
1 person likes this
@rebelann (112878)
• El Paso, Texas
31 Aug 15
@TexanTornado oh how I wish but in her case it was cookies, cake and even dinner if you happened to stop by, she just loved to feed people.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
31 Aug 15
@rebelann Ok, so where is the problem in that? Just don't eat before you go over.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
31 Aug 15
Oh no. You mean like an over abundance of veggies? We had a neighbor like that, we had our garden, but theirs were more than the two of them could eat, so we always found fresh veggies sitting on our front porch.
1 person likes this
@Cristi_Ichim (3743)
• Bucharest, Romania
1 Sep 15
Don't know what to think about percentage but the ideal is that the partners can get along well.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Sep 15
The percentage seems to be an issue with a few. I don't think the percentage really matters, whether it's 50% or 100% as long as both parties are doing equally to contribute to the 'relationship'. Whatever kind it might be.
1 person likes this
@fufurinha (11930)
• Portugal
31 Aug 15
I've already heard that expression and I agree with it. In every realtionship (friends, family, lovers) both people have to make an effort so that the relationship can grow healthy.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
31 Aug 15
That is definitely a fact in my opinion. To continuously receive without giving, is just someone using you.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
31 Aug 15
@TexanTornado No, that it is not.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Sep 15
To me, to GIVE is something I GET pleasure in.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
2 Sep 15
@Beatburn Enjoy pampering yourself? I don't blame you.
@Beatburn (4286)
• Philippines
2 Sep 15
@TexanTornado same here. To be able to give myself to others, time, and treasure is a source of happiness.
@Tampa_girl7 (50250)
• United States
1 Sep 15
This is great advice. After 26 years of marriage, it has to be 50/50 to endure.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
2 Sep 15
Thank you. I seem to think so. 26 years? Wow, that is absolutely wonderful. Congratulations!
@Blondie2222 (28611)
• United States
31 Aug 15
Yes I believe i this also. If one partner tries and gives and the other doesn't there really isn't a relationship. You have to be equal and communicate also. My boyfriend and i always do 50% each with whatever we do. If we go out one time he pays the next time I pay. We also trade whose car we take each week. It works out best this way.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
31 Aug 15
I agree, it isn't a relationship, it's one using the other. Something I am not a fan of at all. Sounds like ya'll have a great relationship, I am happy for the both of you. Oh and yes, communication does play a good part in it also.
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
1 Sep 15
When you care about someone, you should give selflessly. Give everything you've got without expecting to receive anything in return. When you begin to expect something in return, that is when you become disappointed when others don't live up to your expectations.
That does not mean you should allow yourself to become a doormat. If the other person is selfish then of course it will not work out. But in a healthy relationship both parties are giving selflessly and caring only about the other person and not about themselves.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Sep 15
I totally agree with you. When it comes down to the matter of the heart, giving can show us whether it's opened or just greedy.
@LadyDuck (471508)
• Switzerland
1 Sep 15
This is a saying that I have heard many times but I have to agree with @PhredWreck both parties need to give 100% and expect nothing. If you also receive is a gift.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Sep 15
Yes, I get the 100%, but I phrased it so it came out equal. Meaning give AND take.
1 person likes this
@TrabWrites (18)
• Orlando, Florida
1 Sep 15
Back when I was a sophomore in high school a couple of years ago my teacher was talking about how some women didn't get jobs. I was perplexed, why wouldn't they? She kept talking about women's rights and then asked the males in the class if they would marry a smart girl that would help support the family or a pretty girl who almost contributes nothing. I was surprised when about half the class picked the pretty girl. Then again depending on some circumstances my answer to that question would change. If I had money and could afford wasting money then I don't mind if my spouse didn't give their spouse a 100% in that sense; otherwise I believe anyone in a relationship should support each other fully no matter what happens.
1 person likes this
@TexanTornado (5573)
• United States
1 Sep 15
In your scenario in which you stated here, I think it depends on the couple themselves. I myself don't work outside the home, it was a choice made by both me and my hubby. For he has a good job and can afford the things we need. However, I do the things that need to be done around the house, so it gives him just as much as he gives me. Perhaps not 'monetary', but give and take isn't just about money.