Are We Too Late To Save The Environment?
@arthurchappell (44998)
Preston, England
October 2, 2015 8:15am CST
There are some who claim our impact on the environment through pollution and gas emissions is a scare-mongering hoax or that the Earth is just naturally warming up anyway. I personally tend to veer towards the theoretical 'we are doing too little, too late' school that thinks we are now stuffed and doomed but that we should still do what we can to slow down what is now probably inevitable. I suspect our great grand-kids are going to be in a real nightmare World we really don’t want to see.
Arthur Chappell
5 people like this
10 responses
@rebelann (112770)
• El Paso, Texas
2 Oct 15
Or rather we're doing too much destruction. With over 7 billion people on earth these days everyone just wants to be fed, clothed and housed but to do that all those big conglomerates that want to suck the $$ out of your pocket need to destroy more forests and deserts and build more houses and cities, yep, that would cause early global warming ..... but don't fear, Mother Nature always finds a way to get even.
2 people like this
@rebelann (112770)
• El Paso, Texas
23 Nov 15
I like the way you said that @friendlyopinion
Many Native Americans also believe the earth is a Mother and like you they feel she will make herself healthy once more, but as you put it she will have to eradicate the cancer, and we are the only species that is causing so much destruction. I pray she will not destroy other species just to be rid of us.
@arthurchappell (44998)
• Preston, England
23 Nov 15
@friendlyopinion the Gaia hypothesis does try to see Earth as one living co-dependent eco-system in just such a way but it is clouded in New Age mystical mumbo-jumbo
2 people like this
@friendlyopinion (77)
• United States
23 Nov 15
What if we think of Mother Earth as one living system, with the rainforests as her lungs and the waterways and oceans as her circulatory system? And all of the various species who are a part of Earth are like the cells. Then one type of cell begins increasing at an abnormally fast rate, poisoning the Earth's vital systems as it spreads. Now, instead of being healthy cells, these cells have mutated to become cancerous. And what if, instead of "getting even", the Earth just needs to do something about these cancerous cells in order to be fully healthy again? Wouldn't it be a bad time to be a cancer cell?
2 people like this
@Asylum (47893)
• Manchester, England
2 Oct 15
We have no way of knowing whether some of the problem is a natural occurrence, but we are certainly responsible for much of it.
I cannot see any way in which we can undo all the damage that has been done, but we can certainly stop polluting and avoid compounding the problem further.
Unfortunately everyone makes the right sounds and speeches then carries on as usual.
2 people like this
@Carol2015 (136)
• Zhengzhou, China
2 Oct 15
voices are too loud while acts are rare. we can not control others,but we can control ourselves.
3 people like this
@rebelann (112770)
• El Paso, Texas
2 Oct 15
@Carol2015 So very true and sad. Most are driven with the I want and I will have mentality.
1 person likes this
@owstalaga (4707)
• Philippines
5 Oct 15
I believe it's better late than never. As long as we do what we can in our own small way it should help. Makes us sleep better knowing we're doing what we can.
1 person likes this
@arthurchappell (44998)
• Preston, England
5 Oct 15
Yes, I agree we shouldn't give up on hope or effort yet
1 person likes this
@arthurchappell (44998)
• Preston, England
28 Sep 16
@Bluedoll My question marks usually look pretty lonely
1 person likes this
@friendlyopinion (77)
• United States
11 Nov 15
For the climate refugees whose island villages are already slipping into the sea, this is not a theoretical discussion. I was just reading about the difficulty of moving these families off-island. Imagine seeing the waves come higher every year and finally having to abandon your home, along with a community that has been in the same location for generations! Many are calling for the fossil fuel industry to be responsible for the costs of relocation, but of course they are refusing.
We humans have fouled our nest. There are some promising technologies to begin to clean up our mess, but even today, there are vast systems of disinformation paid for by fossil fuel corporations, that allow politicians to plead ignorance and thus do nothing. It is up to each of us, but I think you're right, our grand-kids will most likely live in a much harsher volatile world.
What if we all got together to really tackle this problem? Something like the US push for the first moon landing, or the allied efforts during WW2? Perhaps the upcoming Paris talks will accomplish something.
1 person likes this
@arthurchappell (44998)
• Preston, England
11 Nov 15
we could slow it down but we are too late to stop it entirely. In a few generations the effects will be a living hell for many
1 person likes this
@skysnap (20153)
•
2 Oct 15
The way things are going on with the environment I think it is a bit too late. We just have to wait for the life to turn up and make more mess. for example more tsunamis lately. and also some climate changes. and people wasting more plastic on the road and turning the rivers more bad.
1 person likes this
@Jessicalynnt (50523)
• Centralia, Missouri
3 Oct 15
I don't think so, I think some things might be at risk, but that the world has it's own autocorrects, things get too out of wack and we'll see some major event and shifts to correct the imbalance
1 person likes this
@crazyhorseladycx (39509)
• United States
2 Oct 15
the worlds been evolvin' 'n changin' since the beginnin' 'f time. alaska, many centuries 'go was tropical, where i live was once a vast swamp lands. i do believe that humans actions 've accelerated the process tenfold.
1 person likes this