What is North Korea planning?

@vandana7 (100288)
India
January 6, 2016 9:20am CST
The Hydrogen bomb or what appeared to be it, was experimented despite treaties. Do folks not realize that if Chernobyl has rendered so many acres useless for humans, for several thousands years, same thing is likely to happen if another nuclear explosion is tried on land they propose to capture? I can't even imagine what happens in sea. ISIS militants are not likely to have restraint. They can kill the entire world for the sake of their mistaken beliefs. So was that explosion to tell ISIS come on, we have the technology, we are willing to share it with you for a price. A demonstration perhaps? After all, North Korea faces no threat, unlike India. So why if not for monetary gains? Are we then staring at more hijacking, money laundering, and drug trafficking to earn monies to pay for the high price that North Korea possibly seeks from ISIS? And should we be destroying the market for nuclear bombs?
7 people like this
6 responses
@topffer (42156)
• France
6 Jan 16
I doubt that North Korea has any relation with ISIS, and for the supposed H bomb, I will wait tomorrow for the results of the air analysis from Japan... It can be a gratuitous provocation.
3 people like this
@vandana7 (100288)
• India
6 Jan 16
Provoking whom?
1 person likes this
@topffer (42156)
• France
6 Jan 16
@vandana7 The rest of the world. North Korea has not a lot of allies today. @LadyDuck And it is also a propaganda destined to its own population. A political regime killing its own executives like North Korea needs news like this to not fall.
2 people like this
@LadyDuck (471541)
• Switzerland
6 Jan 16
@topffer You could be right. North Korea loves to provoke, only to show that they are powerful.
2 people like this
@boiboing (13153)
• Northampton, England
6 Jan 16
He's a silly little tyrant showing off to his people. He has no interest in ISIS, I'm sure. They have no common ground. As for North Korea not being under threat, they are squeezed between China and South Korea (with whom they had a war for many years) and Russia. I think I might want a bomb with neighbours like that.
2 people like this
@vandana7 (100288)
• India
6 Jan 16
Monetary gains are always common ground. In any event, are we talking about anti china country? Come on..that is much too small a country for China to be poking around.
@vandana7 (100288)
• India
6 Jan 16
@boiboing ..Ok..I agree...but it is in many ways insignificant for China. There is sea to contend with. Basically a poor country...Tibet...is continuous land..population being small it is easier to win over I suppose.
@boiboing (13153)
• Northampton, England
6 Jan 16
@vandana7 North Korea - population 25 million. Tibet - population 3 to 6 million. I rest my case!
1 person likes this
@amadeo (111938)
• United States
6 Jan 16
I do not know what they are planning but it is scary.Not sure what they have in mind.The stock market does not like it.
1 person likes this
@vandana7 (100288)
• India
6 Jan 16
Yeah..our stock markets too are wary. Especially after Chinese market had a free fall and Shanghai stopped trading for almost a day.
@garymarsh6 (23404)
• United Kingdom
16 Jan 16
This nasty little tubby man with the very bad haircut is a menace to the world. He is vile and cruel to his own people. He is just rafting up rhetoric to annoy the Americans hoping they will do something to give him the excuse so he can nuke the South. His poor people are suffering beyond belief. I do not think he would go near ISIS but it would be nice he locked them away in their gulags.
@Shiva49 (26684)
• Singapore
6 Jan 16
Unless the major powers work in unison many small fries will get away with murder. But we are bent upon playing with fire. North Korea knows they can get away with anything as some countries are a law unto themselves or allowed to by others - siva
2 people like this
@vandana7 (100288)
• India
6 Jan 16
Nuclear power...should not have been used, disclosed..whatever. You know what, I would have solar panels lining the Indo Pak border. That way any disruption in power would immediately be noticed.
1 person likes this
@Shiva49 (26684)
• Singapore
7 Jan 16
@vandana7 There is no greater hypocrisy than in relations among the countries. How can we justify only few having nuclear weapons and they say they are more responsible - but only in their eyes! The way froward is disarmament but each major power has own agenda or at least their political leaders do - siva
@trivia79 (7828)
• El Segundo, California
7 Jan 16
You're somewhat right that North Korea faces no threat because they are the threat. As of now, they are a silent threat waiting for the right moment to make a loud noise.