Writing - Self Publishing VS Traditional Publishing. Which do you prefer and why?

Accord, New York
February 11, 2016 9:15am CST
Writing a book? Looking to publish? Then the question of whether you should self publish or publish traditionally with an agent has probably crossed your mind more than a few times as you're editing your work. Well, as a somewhat experienced author, I thought I'd give you some pointers on both. Publishing with an agent: 1. Writing a query letter This is basically a pitch. You've got to hook your agent in in a maximum of usually two pages (not including a preview of your book if they ask for one). In these letters, you include who you are, your book (genre, synopsis, main points) and your plans for your story (standalone, series, etc). Be sure to look up examples online. 2. Getting an agent BE CAREFUL. If an agent asks for money up front, RUN. Agents are paid from a percentage of your contract with your publisher, anywhere from 5 - 15%. To find an agent, look up literary agents online for your particular genre. DO NOT send any genre to any agent. If it is not a genre they are looking for, chances are, your email won't even be opened. 3. Losing your rights This is the hardest part for every author. When you sign on that dotted line, you're signing away your story for a set pay out. You no longer have any rights yto your story, title, characters, or anything related. It now belongs to your publisher. Which also means they can change what they please. They can remove characters all together, change the title, genre, and anything else within the binds of your contract. So make sure you're reading the fine print! 4. Marketing Many people like the appeal of marketing with traditional publishing. Because for the most part, you're not doing any work. It falls on the publisher. You've already been paid, so why do you care, right? The publisher, having spent all that money, usually does everything in their power to make sure your book sells well. Self-Publishing: 1. Free control, keep your rights When you self-publish, you have full control over your work. Forever. You can make changes at any time, usually have a good control of your pricing, which you can change, create new covers, etc. Unless of course you get an agent somewhere down the line. Yes, just because you self-publish now, doesn't mean that SAME book can't be picked up by an agent later. Know the movie MARTIAN? That started out as a self-published book before it blew up. Success is very much still possible. 2. Deadlines There are none - unless you set up pre-orders. If you have a bad writing month, don't worry about it. Pick up again when you can and get your book out there on your time. 3. Marketing Now this is the hard part. Marketing when self-published costs money, and so does editing. The most effective marketing, that is. But more times than not, it pays off, and you can see the results almost instantly. I would suggest social media, and paying for book promotions on websites (I will post a list of the best and why at another date). It takes a lot of time and effort, but you'll know that it was you and your hard work alone that made you a success. As you probably don't know (but could guess), I'm a published novelist ( jazjohnson.com )I chose to self publish for a number of reasons, which I'm happy to share. 1. Effort & Community I very much like being a part of my success. Not that traditional publishing doesn't take a heck of a lot of work, because it does. But it's just not as hands-on once you sign that contract. I love seeing the results when I try a new marketing plan, or being able to connect with my readers an the indie (indie author) community. we learn from one another, and help each other grow. Many authors just go under the radar in terms of community when publishing traditionally. To too many, it stops at payday. Then the book becomes the publisher's problem. 2. Best of both worlds When publishing with an agent, you can never get those rights back if you want to self publish later down the line. But if you self-publish first, you can always make a name for yourself first before passing the torch. 3. Free control I mentioned it earlier. I love being able to beat to my own drum, make my own deadlines, and be able to constantly come back to my work for edits (typos, covers, etc). It just works for me not to have a deadline unless I set it myself with a pre-order. I like being allowed to have off days without the pressure of losing a contract. And most importantly, I like keeping my rights - at the very least, to start out (Publishers are less likely to change your work if it has become popular on its own first - readers will know the differences). Alright, here's a quick recap. Traditional Publishing: 1. Query letter (Pitch) 2. Contract, loss of rights 3. Free Marketing 4. Upfront payment instead of monthly royalties 5. Can't switch to self-publishing Self-Publishing 1. Keep rights, free control 2. Paid marketing/editing 3. Indie Community 4. Can switch to traditional Are you looking to publish a book? If so, which are you thinking of doing, and why? What advantages and disadvantages do you find with both? Is there anything you can add to what I've said? Do you agree? Disagree? Why?
The blog and official website of Jaz Johnson.
8 people like this
11 responses
• United States
11 Feb 16
Yes, I knew all of this and even know what to look for in a contract (my instructor had signed one during the semester and showed us what to look for) but again, unless someone has thousands to pay a professional editor, (or knows one who will do it at a lower cost) I don't believe that an author who self edits can find mistakes that even a reader can find, like dull characters. Of course you might be an exception (I never read any of your work) but best selling authors usually have editors or agents. I can't afford an editor, hence I am looking for an agent.
2 people like this
• Accord, New York
11 Feb 16
@Carmelanirel2 I don't think dull characters fall under editing. I think that's just something you would need to work on as a writer as you develop your own style.
1 person likes this
• United States
11 Feb 16
@SometimesINovel I think it would if a character is boring, the author needs to edit it and make him or her more exciting. I have already read books with boring characters, or let's say I have read chapters, if I loss interest even after 2 chapters, I don't go any further, and that's better than some who have told me that if the first paragraph is not a hook, an agent won't be interested.
1 person likes this
• United States
11 Feb 16
@SometimesINovel I just read the first paragraph of Love Song on your website.. Got my attention!
1 person likes this
@patgalca (18391)
• Orangeville, Ontario
11 Feb 16
I fully expect that an agent or publisher would change the title of my book. I'm not good at choosing titles anyway. I don't want to do the marketing work. My illness is holding me back from doing so many things in my life.
2 people like this
@patgalca (18391)
• Orangeville, Ontario
11 Feb 16
@SometimesINovel I have friends who publish, have their own publishing companies. I might go that route. Not sure yet.
2 people like this
• Accord, New York
11 Feb 16
@patgalca I'm sorry. Then maybe traditional is the way to go for you. Though, if you have the finances, you could pay someone or sites to market for you.
1 person likes this
• Accord, New York
12 Feb 16
@patgalca That's helpful! I know a handful of people that are taking the first steps in creating their own publishing company. Kudos to them! It must be a lot of work.
1 person likes this
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
13 Feb 16
I chose to go indie because I wanted control of what happened to my books, including the cover. I wasn't willing to give these and other things.
1 person likes this
• Accord, New York
13 Feb 16
@irishidid I feel the same way. And if an agent picks me up afterwards, they wouldn't be able to do many changes, aside from maybe the cover if it was adapted into a film.
1 person likes this
@topffer (42156)
• France
11 Feb 16
It is interesting, as things are a bit different in France than in USA, the main difference is that we always keep moral rights on a book or an article. It means that if the editorial line of a publisher changes, we can interrupt the contract and look for another publisher. Second, writers have no agent, but they are often consulting a lawyer before signing a contract, and it is not free. Depending of the contract you can sign for one book or for several books with the same publisher. If you publish a successful book you will be approached by other publishers, so an agent is not necessary here. The marketing part was as you describe it 20 years ago. Actually many publishers are trying to publish a lot more authors than they did, and are really doing a marketing effort only for their best authors, the others are published with quite no marketing, just by distributing the books to booksellers and asking the authors to sign their books into several bookshops across the country. To respond, I have published several books, chapters of collective books or articles with several publishers, the first one when I was 20 years old. I have never considered self publishing. You do not speak of ebooks. I was not interested by ebooks, and none of my books have had an ebook edition, but I am now considering to publish one in a domain which is not my usual domain of writing.
1 person likes this
@topffer (42156)
• France
11 Feb 16
@SometimesINovel For moral rights there is a difference between the countries of common law and the others, but I read that USA was one of the worst places for a writer. I am interested by your second article about ebooks and will read it gladly.
1 person likes this
• Accord, New York
11 Feb 16
@topffer Very interesting! I never thought the differences per country would be so very vast. I may look up the differences in other countries for myself. Also, yes, I did not mention ebooks as I was talking about publishing types, not platforms, but I do plan on posting about ebooks and paperbacks.
1 person likes this
• Accord, New York
11 Feb 16
@topffer I could believe that, unfortunately. And thanks!
1 person likes this
@KristenH (33393)
• Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
12 Feb 16
I've learned about the pros and cons of publishing routes in a local conference last fall. I'm going traditional first, since I've been querying two manuscripts. One has 5 agents interested, when I finish my Revise and Resubmit I've had for a year, next month. I've started to query small pubs too. Self-pub is my last resort. I've known some authors have self-pubbed their own books after they've been published via major pub houses.
1 person likes this
@KristenH (33393)
• Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
12 Feb 16
@SometimesINovel Not the same book. A new series. I don't know why they chose to do it, while they're still pubbed by their publishers. Maybe a change of venue? Erica Spindler is one of them who self-pubbed a book for a new series recently. She wanted to do something different.
1 person likes this
• Accord, New York
13 Feb 16
@KristenH Oh, I see. That makes sense. You can't publish with an agent and then self-publish that same book. And maybe. It's always good to experience new things. I know if I have the chance to publish traditionally, I would at least try it once.
1 person likes this
• Accord, New York
12 Feb 16
@KristenH They went from an agent to self-publishing with the same book?? I've never heard of that before. Did the publisher terminate the contract, or something?
1 person likes this
@Kboy26 (143)
• Columbia, South Carolina
14 Feb 16
Not to mention, that the publisher already has an audience. All they have to do is announce that the book is coming out on their website and social media pages, and their readers may buy it.
1 person likes this
• Accord, New York
15 Feb 16
@Kboy26 True. They already have readers lined up for you. Another part of the free marketing.
• Accord, New York
16 Feb 16
@Kboy26 Definitely. Especially when you can go traditional at a later date with the same book.
@Kboy26 (143)
• Columbia, South Carolina
15 Feb 16
@SometimesINovel That is the biggest perk of traditional publishing. However, owning the rights to your work sounds appealing.
1 person likes this
@snowy22315 (182175)
• United States
26 Feb 16
I think self publishing is the way to go. You could spend a great deal of time and spend a great deal of money on an agent, and even then your book may not get published.
@mimiang (3760)
• Philippines
11 Feb 16
This discussion is helpful. I want to publish my own book someday. I hope that I can be able to do it .
1 person likes this
• Accord, New York
11 Feb 16
I'm glad I was able to help. Good luck with your writing!
@divalounger (6117)
• United States
11 Feb 16
This is just an excellent view of the pros and cons of each. I find it easier to "ghost write" legal blogs and articles than I do stories--somehow, I find that it is harder to give my stories away than my opinion of statutes--I am sure there is more to be said about this subject--off to have lunch and teach and then I may come back to this!
1 person likes this
@msiduri (5687)
• United States
11 Feb 16
As a self-published author who also has some work in small press periodicals, I'm familiar with most of what you've written. The material is presented clearly and succinctly. Best of luck in all your writing endeavors.
1 person likes this
• Accord, New York
12 Feb 16
@msiduri Thank you! To you as well!
1 person likes this
@RonElFran (1214)
• Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania
12 Feb 16
I'm in the process of writing a book, but am not currently planning to submit it to a publisher. It just seems that the dynamic of the book selling business in this digital age has raised the bar new authors must surmount to get published to prohibitive heights. But maybe by the time I get the book finished, I'll think differently. We'll see.
1 person likes this
• Accord, New York
12 Feb 16
@RonElFran I agree. The restrictions and expectations of authors (especially new ones) from publishers has gotten absurd. Yet another reason I chose self-publishing. I wish you all the best with your book. Let me know what you end up choosing and how it goes!
1 person likes this