I will never understand sue happy Americans
By vanny
@vandana7 (100617)
India
May 31, 2016 9:32pm CST
On the one hand, you all are fine with drinks and cigarettes
but when it comes to food and clothes,
Everything becomes carcinogenic
On the one hand you all are fine with food being removed from shelves of stores
on the other hand you have homeless on roads
asking to be fed
Oh this is bad for bones, that is bad for liver, this can hurt blah blah
Average age of an American is not very different from average age of an Indian,
After paying 10 times for all that...
Can't you all see your lawyers have taken charge of your lives
Stolen your moneys and thrown jobs out of your country
Because prices of everything in your country have that component for legal hazards
SMH SMH SMH
21 people like this
18 responses
@LadyDuck (472074)
• Switzerland
1 Jun 16
The average life expectancy in the world is 71.4 years, that means nothing because it's just an "average". Afghanistan has the lowest expectancy (60.5 years both men and women). Switzerland is 85.3 for women 81.3 for men (they drink and smoke more!), this is the highest immediately after Japan, United States it's only 81.4 for women and 76.4 for men, that is not months, but years. This makes me realize that healthy food helps to live at least 5 years more and surely better.
5 people like this
@vandana7 (100617)
• India
1 Jun 16
Does it not make you wonder why with healthy food the men live only 76.4 years in the US? :) If not the food, the stress of getting that meal on table may kill. I think many factors come into play here..climate for one. As we know anything organic gets spoiled, rots or putrifies in hot climate, so must it be in places like Afghanistan and even India. Medical facilities may also be playing a role. Not merely quality diet. I would have liked to see that information based on ethnicity as it could be indicative of the effect of diet too and possibly genes. To that extent, Israelis may be faring better even though they live in hot climate.
5 people like this
@vandana7 (100617)
• India
1 Jun 16
@LadyDuck ...Exactly, what genes have got accustomed to digesting, it needs to be continued...
I have noticed one thing. Some families eat butteroil here...abundant quantities...butter also..ample amount...and still have healthy heart. At the best, they are hypertensive...but it is not their heart that kills them.
Likewise, genetically, I think I am programmed to eat a lot of pickles. The day I don't have pickle in my diet, I feel I have not had much food, so cravings begin.
3 people like this
@LadyDuck (472074)
• Switzerland
1 Jun 16
@vandana7 Yes, some hot countries are faring better than others. Just a curiosity, after the people of Micronesia (Pacific Island) abandoned their traditional diet for American food, they went from very healthy to obese. Now they are the most obese population in the world.
4 people like this
@topffer (42156)
• France
1 Jun 16
@vandana7 It is more often 3 or 4 days before.
Anyways a costumer victim of food poisoning might sue the shop. Food is removed from shelters before expiry dates because people usually do not want to buy food near expiry date, or only with a comfortable rebate.
4 people like this
@vandana7 (100617)
• India
1 Jun 16
@topffer ... How does it make sense depleting natural resources such as tunas, and sardines and making them out of reach of majority of population. Either the manufacturers should catch fish and sell as per predetermined demand, or the other alternatives need be considered.
4 people like this
@vandana7 (100617)
• India
6 Jun 16
@Daljinder .. And the amount is not small at all...A few years ago, we were paying 50000 per hearing..now I am told it is almost 200000 per hearing. The only man who did some good to us is the present Attorney General, Mukul Rohatgi. All others got paid ..case did not go anywhere. If cases in Supreme Court drag on this long..the country will go to dogs. Basic work is already done at district court level and high court level, isn't it? They have the judgements, and evidences...whatever is the new evidence and argument is all that they need to view vis a vis the old judgment and any other contention. Sad in our case, sad in their case..they are too litigant, and we avoid litigation because of these problems.
2 people like this
@Daljinder (23236)
• Bangalore, India
6 Jun 16
@vandana7 I agree! Dad used to pay the advocate on every hearing whether he was present or not.
2 people like this
@PainsOnSlate (21852)
• Canada
2 Jun 16
I would rather live the way we do than have our governments not caring what chemicals we are eating in our food. Between air pollution and chemicals to grow bigger crops the numbers of cancers has increased and including .children dying because of misuse of chemicals in our food. Sometimes Lawyers are our best friends.
3 people like this
@vandana7 (100617)
• India
1 Jun 16
I am not saying that quality is bad...please don't get me wrong.
What I am saying is ...there can be many factors leading to the problem, not a single thing. What we may consume today may be labeled as very bad tomorrow.
We do eat sugar, right? Don't we know it is bad? Still we eat it? We eat rice? Don't we know how much is fine?
Effectively, choice to take risk is OURS. Not the manufacturer's.
Probability of people developing complications are low, so they can opt for the best, paying a tad more, whereas others can opt for second or third standards in times of adversity. It sure can help them tide over their problems.
3 people like this
@vandana7 (100617)
• India
1 Jun 16
@Lucky15 .. I think the manufacturer is so besotted with higher production numbers that he forgets 20 to 30 percent of it will be wasted. That cost of waste gets added to the price of remaining so that there is no loss as far as the manufacturer is concerned. This makes the safe food beyond reach of many others.
We can be troubled by one thing too many...even the drinking water that reaches our home can hurt us.
I am sorry if I have hurt you...and if you can share your experience without feeling as if we are intruding, may be we can think of a way around it. I apologize if it seems insensitive or intrusive.
2 people like this
@shaggin (72234)
• United States
10 Jul 16
I would like to see the rate of cancer cut down so keeping things out of our food that can cause cancer and out of our homes is good I think. I do not smoke I try to do what I can to reduce my risk. I do agree though that people are way to sue crazy here in America. It really bugs me!
1 person likes this
@Hatley (163776)
• Garden Grove, California
1 Jun 16
I do not listen to much of what ils said nn the net about various foodswhat I do is researh on the web for a reliable person who knows the truth about foods I miss "Shiv I never did know his last name but he was an Indianfrom India and boy did he know about boods he belonged to]our little diabetic party group of five people.I missthem all when I had to move here
2 people like this
@vandana7 (100617)
• India
1 Jun 16
Hatley, so scared are your stores of legal problems that they remove food even when it is consumable from the shelves. I think it could go to a second rate store which would not allow those consuming it any right to sue the food manufacturer for more than specific amount..and from there straight out may be...
Even if food is carcinogenic...the effect can only be felt after consuming it for a long time! And not everybody develops that...and it is not necessary that if I avoid everything that is carcinogenic, I will not get cancer..there still can be something in air that triggers it in my body, but not in another person!
Why pay heavy compensations for that!
3 people like this
@artemeis (4194)
• China
30 Jun 16
I think this is what we call "System" which a lot of countries lack. And if you are too busy and unable to find a lawyer, one will be provided for. So are we clear here? Still not clear enough, here speak to my lawyers.
Sorry I am just cajoling here but this is how the US works. Systematically.
1 person likes this
@vandana7 (100617)
• India
1 Jun 16
For a moment, I thought you were being sarcastic. But seriously...there can be seconds stores, where the legal compensation can be lower...and people don't use such things forever! Only when they are unemployed...and have to pay for their mortgages...temporary shift into lower standard of living is not going to kill them.
2 people like this
@Wordly1 (470)
• Kingston, New Hampshire
1 Jun 16
@vandana7 No sarcasm here. We have become lazy. If we were so health conscious. why do we have so many obese people, many of them with no will power to control their gluttonnery and end up diabetic. Then, we have the 'deadbeat' always on the look out for the next Megamillion law suit(easier than working for a living). Oh, yes...nothing but the best for these losers.
2 people like this
@crazyhorseladycx (39509)
• United States
21 Jun 16
alrighty, ms. vanny! somehow i lost followin' ya, but've since remedied that. dunno what the heck "SMH" means??
i hear ya'n the lawyers 'n cloggin' the court systems with non-sense. not to mention that whate'er settlement folks get, the lawyers get 40% - which fuels their desire to pursue these legalities.
'n the other hand though, many companies've been poisonin' folks fer years. poor practices't the manufacturin' end's caused many deaths'n illnesses. the f.d.a. did nothin' to prevent such.
what took the jobs 'way from america t'weren't the lawsuits, but a weakenin' 'f the american mind-set. 'bout the 80's seemed to be the turnin' point. where folks thought the jobs they did were worth more'n they were gettin' paid. some were correct, 's the companies made record profits yearly 'n their employees worked fer mere pennies'n the dollar. unions made a big stink (they've 'come jest's corrupt's the government) 'n jobs went o'erseas.
i agree 'n the non-sense part i've read'n responses below. one day coffee'll kill ya, the next year'r so, they tell ya to drink 't least 2 cups a day. seems to be that way with most thingies. sadly, too many americans seem to lack common sense 'n too much'f anythin' aint good. they lack the ability to accept responsibility fer their own actions, 'nstead pointin' the finger't others. professin' that they're the reason they're obese, got diabetes 'n the like.
1 person likes this
@paigea (36315)
• Canada
3 Jul 16
Yes, suing should be reserved for life changing events in my humble opinion. But just the other day I fell when I didn't see a step on the deck at my friend's house. She jokingly said, "Please don't sue" I wasn't hurt but wouldn't have thought of suing anyway. When I told my aunt, she said it happened to her when she stepped off a train and they hadn't put the little step in place.
Her lawyer friend wrote a letter to the railway and they gave her $700. I wanted to say that they shouldn't have given her any more than the drycleaning cost for her outfit. If it were me, I would take the responsibility on myself for not noticing the step was missing. I don't get people who expect to be paid for their own carelessness.
1 person likes this
@paigea (36315)
• Canada
3 Jul 16
@vandana7 I am sure if my aunt had sued the railway she would have only won what the drycleaning cost. That would have been far less than the cost of suing. The railway just paid for good publicity. I always think these frivolous suits are just costing the rest of us money.
And the other thing is claiming too much on insurance claims; that just costs the rest of us money too.
1 person likes this
@paigea (36315)
• Canada
3 Jul 16
@vandana7 There is, but I guess they don't catch everyone. I know people who have had an insurance claim after a car accident and had the insurance pay for repairs that had nothing to do with the accident. I guess that is another part of the problem; I don't report my family members who do things like that.
1 person likes this
@ModernDayWriter (3318)
• New Delhi, India
3 Jun 16
@vandana7 always avoid 3person in life doctor, police & lawyer
1 person likes this
@jstory07 (139974)
• Roseburg, Oregon
12 Jun 16
Most Americans are sue happy because they think suing some one will get them easy money.
@PatZAnthony (14749)
• Charlotte, North Carolina
2 Jul 16
It is a little odd-always someone ready to sue!
@garymarsh6 (23404)
• United Kingdom
11 Jun 16
There are some very rich lawyers around these days who I believe are unscrupulous!
1 person likes this
@Daljinder (23236)
• Bangalore, India
6 Jun 16
I won't talk in terms of American or any other nationality.
The carcinogenic substances are absorbed by crops and such through fertilizers used during farming. The people who are prone to obesity due to genes or their digestive systems, they should cut down on the meat intake.