Should we change the way terrorist attacks are dealt with in the media
By Essjayd
@Essjayd (1567)
May 23, 2017 9:08pm CST
I'm saddened to see that a city
I love was attacked by cowards!
Once again choosing an easy target
a bunch of teenagers, children and
families out to enjoy a music
concert.
What angers me is the fact the
world's media continues to allow
extremist groups to claim
responsibility for these attacks.
Why do we allow them to gain
publicity for their cause or turn
the cowards who committed the
attack into martyrs.
The word terrorist should cease to
even exist. These attacks should be
named as what they are a coward committing murder.
I don't believe we should even
give the name, race or religion of
the brain washed coward who
carried out an attack. Just burn
the bits of him that are left and
throw them in the trash let him be
a nobody for eternity rather than
held up as a martyr.
These groups thrive on publicity!
After all if nobody has heard of them
nobody is going to join them!
Somewhere today there will be a sad
nobody considering or planning an
attack thinking that they will die a
martyr. So why let them?
Tonight I witnessed a Muslim friend
being verbally attacked with threats
to him and his business. The media
has created a monster in society so
an ordinary guy cannot go about his
business in peace.
The media should concentrate on the
true heroes. The emergency services
staff who worked all night or turned
up to work when they heard of the
attack. The people of Manchester
who gave free taxis, fed people,
helped the injured and took in those
who had nowhere to go into hotels
and homes.
Give the pages of the news to the
victims, their families and the heroes
rather than creating hatred towards
one religion by giving publicity to a
minority of extremist cowards.
10 people like this
10 responses
@just4him (317241)
• Green Bay, Wisconsin
25 May 17
I only just heard about this here in posts. I don't normally watch the news, which is why I didn't know about it. It's sad that another event brought terror to the lives of so many people.
I don't consider them cowards. Cowards are the ones who sit back and do nothing when they have the means to help in some way. They are terrorists because they terrorize and kill innocent people.
1 person likes this
@Essjayd (1567)
•
29 May 17
Calling them terrorists
gives them a title, it allows them
to be held up as heroes, martyrs to
their cause.
The whole point of terrorism is to
create fear! The more publicity we
give their cause the more we allow
them to create fear and recruit new
members to brainwash to die for
them. If nobody has heard of them
nobody joins them, nobody fears
them and they are nobodies!
It doesn't take a hero to blow up
a bunch of kids it takes a brainwashed
coward!
@ridingbet (66854)
• Philippines
24 May 17
the media here in my country are so open in to showing the murders, killings, and the crimes committed by the police authorities. and yet, the president wants to shut down one TV network because the network presents the bad image of his government. now, where do we stand?
1 person likes this
@ridingbet (66854)
• Philippines
25 May 17
@Essjayd it is so sad to learn that the president declared martial law in the 2nd largest island of my country. with that, i believe all television network will cover the activities there as is, where is, and still there will be more against the news announcement.
i dread if news blackout will happen.
1 person likes this
@Essjayd (1567)
•
24 May 17
I believe in many ways
the government controls the media!
I reckon they drip feed us what they
want us to believe is the truth.
So many alternative news sites
are getting targeted here as they
often disprove what mainstream
media is telling us!
There has been a lot of debate
over the way the BBC in this country
has portrayed or ignored certain
events.
1 person likes this
@teamfreak16 (43418)
• Denver, Colorado
30 May 17
Indeed, they are getting so much news coverage that you'd think ISIS bought an expensive, long term recruiting commercial.
1 person likes this
@FourWalls (69008)
• United States
24 May 17
I agree. Wall-to-wall coverage is just providing free publicity.
1 person likes this
@magnumopus (1644)
• Singapore
29 May 17
There must be a reform in the media about this subject of terrorism.
1 person likes this
•
24 May 17
I completely agree with you. The media always gives attention to the wrong side. There should not be a light shining on a certain group or a person that committed such a heinous crime.. why are they getting publicity?? And why are we perpetuating this? Buying the newspapers, retweeting their tweets (new coverage accounts). Its disrespectful to the victims, honestly.
1 person likes this
@Essjayd (1567)
•
24 May 17
Thanks! I reckon there should
be a media blackout on naming
either the group or the persons
responsible. There have been
plenty of media blackouts relating
to other crimes so why not terrorism.
I'm not suggesting they blackout media
reporting an attack just stop giving
publicity to the extremists behind it.