Are There Better Ways to Spend Campaign Finance Money?

Tweet

Today, Georgia is holding the most expensive House of Representatives election in U.S. history. Our last presidential election also set spending records. More and more money is being spent on U.S. elections every year. When I read about the amount of money being spent per voter, much of it for negative ads, I wonder if this is the best use of the money by the major political parties. First, the vast majority of Americans get tired of watching the ads ... often fast forwarding through them, when possible. Second, even after spending hundreds of millions of dollars a year on election advertising, especially during presidential years, it still comes down to which party is able to get their voters out to the polls. On election day, the party leaders sit helplessly by and hope their voters show up. Perhaps there is a better way. What if the political parties spent less on ads, especially negative ads, and diverted some of the money towards getting voters to the polls on election day? Wouldn't our elections be more open and fair if the political parties paid for volunteers on buses to go block by block through every community in America to register as many people as possible prior to the election? Wouldn't it be a better use of money if the same volunteers and buses returned to the neighborhoods on election day to pick up people and take them to their polling places? Perhaps some of the buses could be turned into mobile voting stations. It is time we re-thought the entire way that campaign funds are spent. Bombarding the public with more and more ads is not the answer. Making it easier for people to vote could open our elections up to everyone and make our representatives more responsive to their voters, not just the party leadership. This thought also makes me wonder, what other ways could campaign finance money be better spent?