Would you rather read books with or without pictures?

October 20, 2017 1:31pm CST
Do you like to read books? So... When you decide to read a book (no matter the genre of reading), do you think the pictures that may be contained in it are an important aspect (perhaps to further stimulate the imagination) or doesn't that make the difference to you (because your imagination can do it on its own)?
3 people like this
6 responses
Megukim
@Megukim (87)
• Edinburgh, Scotland
20 Oct 17
Uhm, I don't read books with pictures. I just let my imagination do the job haha ^^
2 people like this
Hanni Harel
@Hannihar (130213)
• Israel
17 Dec 17
I think books are interesting themselves but if there are pictures too then I love to look at them.
prashu
@prashu228 (37521)
• India
21 Oct 17
I prefer both , but books with pictures would be more interesting
Marlina
@marlina (154130)
• Canada
21 Oct 17
I read a lot of history books and I do like to see some old b/w pictures related to the topic.
Rubeena Bashir Kunju
@rubyriaz007 (4188)
• India
21 Oct 17
I don't read books with pictures. It is not necessary to have pictures on it. My imagination can do it. For me it doesn't make a difference at all. Moreover we will concentrate more on pictures than reading the book...So its not important to have pictures on the book we read...
Mikaela T
@mikaelajuliet (638)
• Boston, Massachusetts
20 Oct 17
I like pictures on books like Harry Potter or A Series of Unfortunately Events... Books made for kids but adults can enjoy too. If it's written for adults... no pictures, please!