Save for retirement includes

@vandana7 (100225)
India
January 23, 2018 12:34am CST
I have been getting an overdose of plight in old age homes. Most of the times people have failed to provide adequately for their retirement, or have trusted their children way too much. Human beings are subservient to their five senses, in which love, affections, gratitude, have no place. The eyes show wrinkled face, and struggle to eat that now tough to eat delicacy. This can't be my parent thinks the child now grown up. So begin with caring for skin caring for teeth caring for hair caring for stomach. You will be surprised how far it can take you with your kith and kin and outsiders who cannot suddenly love you. Have enough so that you do not have to depend upon children. Do not part with it all, no matter what. As you age, accept that children have lives of their own, and need to be away from you. Find decent old age homes where you have to pay, before there are unpleasant moments, that are hard to erase in old age since there is nothing else to think of. So Indians - save for retirement - 50 percent of what you earn monthly and manage within the rest. Buy health insurances within the part that is not your retirement saving, and periodically increase it. If you can't save that much, may be having children is not advisable for you. Cut down on extravagances, or work double shifts. Remain healthy. While money matters are just like game of monopoly, system is pretty believable. Realization in some children comes only when death steals. By then it is too late. Why bring it to that level? If you have enough, children would beg you to stay with them and you can live the life you are accustomed to, hopefully not imposing your wishes on them.
5 people like this
7 responses
@WorDazza (15830)
• Manchester, England
23 Jan 18
I don't think this is a problem restricted to India We have a massive problem with funding care for the elderly in the UK. If residential care is required that comes in at £700 per week so you can see it has the potential to be a huge bill for someone. Fortunately, if you don't have much money then the state will pay this bill but that is becoming unsustainable due to the fact people are living longer and consequently cases of dementia, requiring 24 hour residential care, are going up. We pay additional taxes (National Insurance) to provide a health service that's free at the point of access. This was supposed to take care of us from the cradle to the grave. It is becoming increasingly obvious that we are either going to have to pay more for this or provide for ourselves in later life.
4 people like this
@Fleura (30342)
• United Kingdom
23 Jan 18
@WorDazza Well neither obesity nor dementia is a genuine 'epidemic' so we're not likely to catch either condition. As far as we know at the moment, lifestyle factors play a big part in development of both, so we need to take some responsibility for our own long-term health. Even once dementia has developed, there have been studies showing that environmental factors can improve a patient's condition. I am sorry about your Mum; I hope she gets the best care and also that you get a chance to do your best for her.
3 people like this
@Fleura (30342)
• United Kingdom
23 Jan 18
Luckily with the increase in obesity, life expectancy is now decreasing again. Also the incidence of dementia has not been as great as expected, though no-one is sure why.
4 people like this
@WorDazza (15830)
• Manchester, England
23 Jan 18
@Fleura Yeah, really lucky Maybe I just see more dementia cases than most as my mum has dementia and has recently had to go into specialist residential care. I really hope there isn't a massive dementia epidemic as we are screwed if there is!!
3 people like this
@Fleura (30342)
• United Kingdom
23 Jan 18
It is sad that children should turn on their parents like this, but it happens all too often. In any relationship (with a partner, relative or friend) it pays to be financially independent.
3 people like this
@vandana7 (100225)
• India
23 Jan 18
From a child's perspective, the parent is a grown up and knows how things are, while child is still not conceived. Parents know that there is unemployment, and food is expensive as is housing and medical care not to mention retirement planning. Still parents indulge themselves by enjoying luxuries such as have many cars, buy new cell phones every time there are new features, buy clothes as per fashion rather than as per needs, spend lavishly at parties and religious rituals, have large homes and spend on decoration and get bored of it after sometime, there are simply too many things that are not more necessary than our well being now and in future, but we have indulged in those in the name of social standards. So the child simply inherits those standards, gets accustomed to those, and it becomes difficult for him or her to retrace into another group with lower standards. Parents should not have more children than they can afford, and even after having children stop being extravagant. So parents do err and the fault lies more on their plate because child as a minor cannot be told, I will give you cakes and good clothes and toys so that you look after me in old age. That becomes a contract. Contract with a minor is not acceptable by law. While schooling, and regular food and medicine are parent's responsibilities through law and morals, the other bargain is with a minor! That is the most important reason that parents face abuse for. It is their feelings, need to indulge their feelings my child should look better than the rest, my child should have an enviable birthday party, etc., that lead to their failure to provide for themselves. I do understand the child's perspective and cannot deny merits in them while empathizing with parents.
2 people like this
@vandana7 (100225)
• India
23 Jan 18
@Fleura ...Understanding is mandatory at the time of contract, and at the time having those birthday parties and holidays it was parents who were adults, so the contract was valid only in their minds since the children were minors. Do you borrow when you don't NEED the monies? Child can want and ask, but parents decide. When the child did not NEED that, parents should not have spent on that.
2 people like this
@Fleura (30342)
• United Kingdom
23 Jan 18
@vandana7 I understand you point, but nevertheless the children become adults who 'know how things are' and should understand that now their turn has come.
1 person likes this
@silvermist (19702)
• India
23 Jan 18
I think this applies more to Indian parents for whom their children are their whole universe.Others are bit more practical.
2 people like this
@vandana7 (100225)
• India
23 Jan 18
I don't think they are any more practical than us. lol. Only their laws make them practical. lol. When they pay taxes at the rates they do, they get something out of it. In India, with the kind of spread out of our incomes as we have, there are not enough tax payers, and as the population increases, this number would go down still further. I don't always blame the child. I was watching inmates of a house in Amritsar I think. Older son left ..unmarried, earning barely 6000 per month. Younger son was earning 5000 he too left parents. How could they feed parents, when they have not enough for themselves? Where did parents go wrong? Rather where did our government go wrong? It did not tell them hey this is the criteria for having the second child! Does it have to be explained? If not, take away 50 percent of all incomes, and arrange for old age. Another woman who was running a business had five children. They beat her up, and took over her business. She had thought in old age, at least one of the five would take care of her. Today together they do not spare her 2500 while earning more than 250000 per annum from what she established. Another son, pays around 4000 per month but does not meet his mother. He is afraid he would want to take her home, and then wife would say no. Stories galore...makes me think I am lucky I have no child.
1 person likes this
@vandana7 (100225)
• India
23 Jan 18
@silvermist Yeah...legally, its so wrong!!!
1 person likes this
@silvermist (19702)
• India
23 Jan 18
@vandana7 Good point.Some years back we had an old servant woman. We never treated like a servant.She was from a middle class family.She had 3 houses in her name and some savings from her late husband.But she was foolish enough to transfer all the houses in her sons' name Lent the money too.So one day she was on the streets.Nobody were prepared to have their mother with them.For some time she stayed as a helper with us.But after she received her salary and went to live with her married,daughter in Chennai for whom she had not given anything.(No dowry even though the son-in-law was poor). Such is life.
2 people like this
• Philippines
23 Jan 18
Okay, now you remind of teeth, something that I lack caring in the path which I'm paying for it now.
2 people like this
@vandana7 (100225)
• India
23 Jan 18
Yeah..time we looked at those seriously. :)
2 people like this
@LadyDuck (471294)
• Switzerland
23 Jan 18
I think that everybody would love to "remain healthy", life not always follows what you want. As we have no children we saved for our retirement. May be that ten years from now we will sell this house and move to a retiree center, where there are medical facilities... may be, because nobody knows if we will be here 10 years from now.
2 people like this
@vandana7 (100225)
• India
23 Jan 18
Some types of health are within our hands. At least that much we can try.
2 people like this
@vandana7 (100225)
• India
24 Jan 18
@LadyDuck Yes, that is sad about children with cancer. But others can offer at least as much consideration by looking after their health. That does not mean they have to spare monies for others. It means they are not going to be liability on any medical structure that the government manages to provide for those who need it.
2 people like this
@LadyDuck (471294)
• Switzerland
24 Jan 18
@vandana7 How I would like that this would be true. What do you think of kids who come to life with cancer? What could they do to prevent the event? Health is a gift, we only can prevent to spoil our health, but there is very little we can do to prevent such things like a heart attack.
2 people like this
• Indonesia
24 Jan 18
I think it right every parent have to keep their children well cause that is their guarantee in their old age
1 person likes this
@vandana7 (100225)
• India
24 Jan 18
@Firdausjurida That is where it is going wrong all the way. Parents are not thinking enough!!! Let me try to explain. A father has 9 sons. He has 100 acres. Each child gets 10 acres to grow food and the father and mother have 10 acres. At the of their lives when they die, each child has more than 11 acres and can live well. Next generation, each child has only 11 acres and some small lot. If each child has 9 children, then only 1.11 acre per child!!! That would not be enough for food. How will children look after parents when they do not have enough for growing food that they need? Fastest way to poverty! Poverty leads to fights, envy, anger, jealousies, and crimes. Same happens in job scenario. So parents need to see that they have only that many children as they can truly afford, notwithstanding what politicians are saying, religious leaders are saying, and all those rich people are saying. Rich want people to remain poor so that they can get cheap labor.
1 person likes this
• Indonesia
24 Jan 18
@vandana7 but I am as a child of my parents I think it was may obligation to help my parents in their old age. cause they have struggled to save us till became adult
@metanya (20)
• Indonesia
23 Jan 18
Yeah, I do agree.... Stop being parents that treat their children as "belongings". Sorry if my english not good enough.
1 person likes this
@vandana7 (100225)
• India
23 Jan 18
That is so true. Time to think of it as retirement from duties of a parent as well.