Internet's Effects on Art: Good or Bad?

United States
September 10, 2006 5:34pm CST
Do you think the Internet has a positive or negative effect on art? You can potentially reach more people, but you probably have a greater chance to get your work stolen or copied.
2 people like this
7 responses
21 Sep 06
Beyond the stealing of each others work, it has of course a positive effect on Art. I’ve seen artists I would have never seen without the internet, sites like deviantart.com (although it was better when it wasn’t so commercial) go along way to promoting art from unknown artists.
1 person likes this
@Netsbridge (3253)
• United States
5 Jan 07
The Internet is a very good tool for exposure. Because people can be multi-profession, thus acquiring an added unique insight to various issues, I think only an unwise person would be so stupid as to steal the works of another. I scribble, and because of my multi-profession background, tend to deduct matters from several angles at once, which often leave others dumbfounded as to how I perceive matters. Now, anyone stealing my works will be in deep trouble if challenged to explain the contents. Therefore, if I cannot find a publisher smart enough to see the depth of the works, I dread not to share my findings and/or inspirations with those who which to be informed in advance.
@Sweety76 (1594)
• India
3 Oct 06
if anyone has to copy the art, he can do it anyway. i dont think internet is playing negative role in this
@infohome (1219)
• India
27 Nov 06
Good. and a "+" rating for you.
• India
15 Dec 06
Internet's Effects on Art . it is good .
@dan1107 (339)
• India
28 Nov 06
If used properly, the internet will have more positive effect.
@kataztrophy (1836)
• United States
21 Sep 06
If you place a logo/watermark on your art, there is less of a chance your work will be clamed by someone else. I feel that overall is a positive for the simple fact that you can get alot of exposure.