King Edward II

@indexer (4852)
Leicester, England
January 16, 2019 6:22pm CST
Born in 1284, Edward was the fourth son of Edward I, but the first three died in childhood. Edward was nothing like his father in temperament or ability. He was declared Prince of Wales – the first English prince to be given this title – in 1301, and became king in 1307 at the age of 23. Edward showed considerable favour to his friend – and probable homosexual lover – Piers Gaveston, to the extent that he provoked a revolt by the English barons who passed ordinances to reduce the king’s powers and demand the expulsion of Gaveston, who was later murdered. Edward lost control of Scotland after defeat at the Battle of Bannockburn in 1314. With Gaveston dead, Edward found new favourites in Hugh le Despenser and his son, also called Hugh. Opposition now came from his wife, Isabella, and her lover Roger Mortimer, who were forced to flee to France in 1323. However, they returned in 1326 and were able to depose Edward and place his son, another Edward, on the throne. The Despensers were captured and executed and Edward died in captivity at Berkeley Castle in Gloucestershire. He was almost certainly murdered. (The photo is of the tomb of Edward II in Gloucester Cathedral. I took it in natural light on a hand-held camera, which is why the focus is not perfect!)
4 people like this
5 responses
@marguicha (220681)
• Chile
17 Jan 19
I first heard of this King in the movie Braveheart, with Mel Gibson. Although movies do not depict reality.
2 people like this
@marguicha (220681)
• Chile
17 Jan 19
@indexer I see. Thanks. Too many Edwards in England
1 person likes this
@marguicha (220681)
• Chile
17 Jan 19
@indexer Maybe, after all, it is easier to not to have Kings and Queens to learn at school.
@indexer (4852)
• Leicester, England
17 Jan 19
@marguicha As you will see if you keep following this series, there were eight King Edwards altogether! Mind you, that is not as bad as the King Louis' in France - 18 of them, and some people who say there were actually 19, but that's another story!
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (336270)
• Rockingham, Australia
17 Jan 19
They were pretty violent times weren't they?
2 people like this
@indexer (4852)
• Leicester, England
17 Jan 19
That is true. The history of the English monarchy was a pretty bloodstained one - these days the blood on the carpet is figurative rather than literal!
2 people like this
@JudyEv (336270)
• Rockingham, Australia
17 Jan 19
@indexer And thank heavens for that.
2 people like this
@Fleura (29892)
• United Kingdom
17 Jan 19
Edward could only be given the title Prince of Wales because his father had finished off the Welsh Princes - that's why he was the first.
1 person likes this
@indexer (4852)
• Leicester, England
17 Jan 19
That's right. It was another form of oppression against the Welsh, along with building massive castles all over the place. It was a very effective way of saying "We are the masters now".
1 person likes this
@pjmurphy (2499)
• United States
17 Jan 19
Oh, those monarchs. Always so much drama. A little like our current administration.
2 people like this
@indexer (4852)
• Leicester, England
17 Jan 19
I hope only a little!
2 people like this
@Courage7 (19633)
• United States
17 Jan 19
An excellent photo John thanks very much. Thanks for the history once again.
1 person likes this