Why Marie Kondo would have her work cut out with my friend
By Boingboing
@boiboing (13153)
Northampton, England
January 21, 2019 6:25am CST
I went to a 'reunion' of some online friends this weekend and we got onto the topic of decluttering. You could be forgiven for not realising if you actually saw my house, but I'm actually a big fan of the Japanese tidying guru Marie Kondo. She's stirring up quite some controversy at the moment thanks to her series on Netflix. I don't have Netflix, so I've not seen it.
One woman - I'll call her Alice though it's not her name - told me she'd 'done' her wardrobe a few years ago but one thing she refused to part with was her Ralph Lauren trouser suit that she'd had for about 15 years. She had worked at a really major London fashion store and bought it for £250 down from about £1000.
"So does it really make you happy?" I asked her.
Well, she hadn't worn it in over a decade but "It's Ralph Lauren, I paid £250". That apparently was reason to keep it.
It didn't fit. Perfect reason to get rid of it.
It was absolutely the wrong style - a double breasted trouser suit.
If I wanted to profile the body type LEAST suited to such a suit it would be almost exactly her. Under 5 foot tall and VERY curvy. I recall my 'Trinny and Susannah' dressing rules (apologies to all outside the UK but they were the gurus of the late 90s and early noughties). Double breasted jackets, polo necks and halter tops, all strictly NOT for those with significant 'boobage'. Trouser suits on tiny short people - also not the best idea.
It was totally out of fashion.
BUT it was Ralph Lauren and she paid £250 for it so it just couldn't be got rid of.
I suggested converting it into something - a cushion (on which the label would be prominently displayed - part of a patchwork, anything that might get it out of the wardrobe and on display.
She remained adamant. Hell would freeze over before she parted with her suit. No great joy, no practical use whatsoever, and a long ago 'sunk cost' of £250 meant this would probably go with her to her grave.
At least in her coffin somebody can let out the back seams and make it fit. She'll still look like a 'business Barbie dwarf' but what the heck, it's Ralph Lauren and it cost £250.
When I next tackle my wardrobe I will sit down and think of Alice in her RL suit and be even more determined to free myself from past follies than ever before.
5 people like this
6 responses
@scarlet_woman (23463)
• United States
21 Jan 19
my mom used to buy clothes on impulse..and they'd sit whereever she left them.
just seemed to collect them in case she might want to wear them later.
i got rid of bags and bags to a donation box.
3 people like this
@LadyDuck (471541)
• Switzerland
21 Jan 19
I am guilty of keeping clothing that I do not wear from years. I know things come back to fashion, but my 30's do not come back and, even if those dresses still fit, I would not dare to wear them. They are in a trunk, in the basement, to keep my cabinet clean and tidy. I think that this is the year to get rid of plenty of things.
1 person likes this
@Fleura (30399)
• United Kingdom
21 Jan 19
You would laugh at me because my wardrobe is absolutely stuffed with clothes and years can go by without me wearing them - but then some unusual occasion comes up and I don't have to go shopping because I'm pretty sure I can put together something suitable from what I already have. Just yesterday I wore a shirt I made myself when I was 18.
2 people like this
@responsiveme (22926)
• India
21 Jan 19
I understand about it not being her type st all.
Apart from the label things there are middle aged women who go.in for clothes that look only on young people.
That way a sari is ageless as it is a drape and covers or reveals just as you want it to
2 people like this