How was the movie Pearl Harbour?

well pearl harbour really affected me. i was a supporter of war but after seeing movies like pearl harbour. i have become a supporter of peace.

yeah its true!! the first movie which effected me a lot!

hi,i didn't see that movie...but i heard from friends like you..

I did not like it much. It was all action and violence and i dont like such movies much. Moreever i had a feeling that the movie was not well directed.Yes i agree that the real pearl harbour was a big disaster. It would have been nive if it didnt take place. Then the atomic bombing also wouldnt have taken place.

i liked the movie, but i think they could have ended it after the actual raid on pearl. i dont know why they had to drag the raid on tokyo into it, it really was unrelated...it was rather long for a movie... there is a site that shows how many bloopers there are in the movie (there are tons) so obviously they didnt do their homework to well either.

Excellent film based on an event that happened as a blokey love story bit not my cuppa tea

Me also think about it that it was a good movie What a great film this could have been! The recreation of the attack on Pearl Harbor is some of the best film-making ever - an extraordinary and moving sequence made utterly believable by state of the art special effects. It ranks up there with the opening sequence from "Saving Private Ryan" and the sinking of the "Titanic" as one of the most harrowing "disaster" sequences filmed in recent years. But like both those other two films, PEARL HARBOR is desperately in need of a decent script to frame the disaster sequence. Okay - I could almost accept the hokey old love triangle romantic plot - certainly the stars are great to look at - but the dialogue really sucked: "I don't think I'll ever look at another sunset without thinking of you". Please! And all those hero shots from the ground, and the slow motion love bits, and the soppy music, and the eternal sunsets... But what this film really needed was an editor! The climax of the film is the attack on Pearl Harbor - an American defeat. But it seems the film-makers decided that the American audience wouldn't be satisfied with this - and so the movie grinds on and on for another hour or so dramatising a revenge attack on Japan. And we're supposed to believe that this attack was fought by the very same guys who were on the ground in Hawaii. I mean we all know that America won the war in the end, so did we really need this long epilogue? Personally I'd cut out all the Roosevelt and the Japanese high command scenes and concentrate on the experiences of the people on the ground at Pearl Harbor. The Japanese stuff was all completely unbelievable anyway. The sad loss would be the superb performance of Jon Voight as Roosevelt - but maybe they could make another film about him. I'd also end the film after the attack at Pearl Harbor, as the survivors pick up the pieces. So why not have a shorter Director's Cut - a novel concept - that makes this film the great film it could have been. If you like I'll lend the scissors!

Pearl Harbor is a great movie. it seemed like real war. It show what happen when japan attack on pearl harbor and cause of atomic war.

I actually like it!

I did not like it much. It was all action and violence and i dont like such movies much. Moreever i had a feeling that the movie was not well directed.

yes i really think pearl harbor was a good movie it gave an descriptive outlook of the main features of the war if anything can be the worst that will be the fight of pearl harbor.

Yeah, I agree. I enjoy this a lot. Of course Pearl Harbor was a real horrible disaster.