When hard work and honesty get punished
By vanny
@vandana7 (100617)
India
April 28, 2024 11:23am CST
Periodically, governments come up with proposals that leave hardworking and honest folks shocked and with a sense of feeling cheated.
Take for example...giving homes free of cost to the poor. I have been poor. I have struggled for more than 12 hours per day for 23 years of my life. I have borrowed from banks and paid back my home loans promptly. Interest rates back then were pretty high. Still, I struggled, denied myself somethings, and established myself.
So when the poor are given something free, I am left to wonder, whether I was a fool. I feel cheated. Maybe government didn't want me to work that hard.
I would rather poor be given highly subsidized residential accommodation for specific number of years of their lives. That should be entitlement of every citizen subject to income criteria. Handing over real estate like that as OWNERS, which brings them on par with me, without working as hard, without paying as much taxes as I did, makes me feel betrayed.
I read today somewhere that IRS wants to write off backlog of income tax. What would honest tax payer feel? Does it not encourage dishonesty?
9 people like this
8 responses
@just4him (317277)
• Green Bay, Wisconsin
29 Apr
Giving a free home to a poor person isn't a good idea. People need to have some self-respect in the things they have. Working for them is one way to gain self-respect, even if you need to live on government assistance. At least you know you worked for what you received.
1 person likes this
@LindaOHio (181931)
• United States
29 Apr
As a person who has worked for 45+ years, I'm always miffed when I see the poor get so many handouts. There was a period when my husband and I were out of work; and we couldn't get food stamps, etc. because we owned a car. That always aggravated me. Have a good week.
1 person likes this
@vandana7 (100617)
• India
29 Apr
Some of the days I worked right through nights and more than 8 hours the following day. Yeah, it was extremely tiresome, but there were never any defaults. People are simply not prepared to work hard anymore. That is because governments offer freebies.
1 person likes this
@aninditasen (16501)
• Raurkela, India
29 Apr
All these free bees are making the labour class lazy. We have struggled to get a home loan and repaired it. From 2023 the inflation has gone so high that it's becoming difficult to make two ends meet. I think the middle class have really been cheated.
1 person likes this
@arunima25 (87854)
• Bangalore, India
28 Apr
All these freebies discourage me. I don't mind giving things at subsidized rate, but not free. These freebies are the worst use of taxpayers money. Free water, free electricity, free bus ride....these are all myopic vision of any political party and will not do any good to nation in long run.
1 person likes this
@vandana7 (100617)
• India
28 Apr
Giving free homes is the worst ever. Government requires money for various infrastructure works. When homes are given away free along with the land, the person builds three to four rooms on it, then lets out, and lives happily ever after. Doesn't have to work. Whatever he earns, he lends at exorbitant interest rates, 36 percent per annum, to be precise. With no income tax returns, he is still poor!
The rooms he builds house families and then he pilfers power, and causes strain on the infrastructure.
You wanna tell me giving homes to poor is great? Nope. Build flats instead, with proper planning. Give them on subsidized rent ...if the going rent is 5000 per room, give it for 2000. This concession is given only once in lifetime. Every citizen is entitled to it, provided he or she falls in some income bracket. Even then, the person is only entitled to it for only 12 years of his life. Get your act together, work! Nation cannot survive on taxes of folks like us. Rental income does not contribute to GDP. Nor does the 36 percent interest per annum on which no tax is paid.
And poor could be poor because they have too many kids, or because they are lazy or drunkards....that is why there has to be a sense of equity with respect to honest taxpayer...and so he too should be entitled to that 12 years subsidized rental accommodation if ever his income falls below the minimum level. This will make many people more dynamic as their responsibilities are lower with them and their spouse together being entitled to 24 years of subsidized rent.
One reason I am unhappy about CAA...they want to call Pakistani Hindus here, they also want to give them free houses....................
That will lead to resentment among locals...after all, they have worked hard here, and not managed to get a house, whereas the Pakistani Hindu gets a house without contributing to nation's wealth!!!
Who knows whether they were rapists, or gamblers in Pakistan.
Once all Hindus are brought out, will it be possible for us to get any information about what is brewing in Pakistan?
And then there are mujahirs and Ahmediyas. They are also persecuted in Pakistan. We have received their help - intelligence service. But if we don't help them will we have sustained information coming our way from them? Why would they help, if we are not willing to help them?
Truly myopic leaders...past as well as present.
1 person likes this
@wolfgirl569 (108301)
• Marion, Ohio
28 Apr
They should not own those homes. I can see getting homeless off the streets. Especially the ones who lost jobs and that's when they lost everything.
1 person likes this
@zainkhan121 (859)
• Pakistan
28 Apr
It's frustrating when government proposals seem to devalue hard work and dedication. Like you, many have put in years of effort and sacrifice to secure their homes and pay their dues. It's natural to feel a sense of injustice when others seemingly get handed the same benefits without the same level of effort. Perhaps a system of subsidized housing tied to specific criteria could strike a fairer balance. As for tax write-offs, it's understandable how it might raise concerns about fairness and encourage dishonesty. It's a complex issue that deserves careful consideration.
1 person likes this