Fox Interview with Harris- Part 2
By DB
@dgobucks226 (35633)
October 19, 2024 10:00am CST
This is another post with my reactions from the Bret Baier interview with Kamala Harris. What I noticed in my analysis was a MISREPRESENTATION OF HER ABILITIES AS AN ATTORNEY, Harris's REFUSAL TO STATE WHETHER SHE SUPPORTS FREE STUFF TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, and Kamala's DECEPTION and UNWILLINGNESS to explain WHY SHE WOULD CHOOSE A RUNNING MATE WHO SIGNED LEGISLATION TO “PROVIDE GIVE AWAYS TO ILLEGALS,” if her position has indeed changed.
For those seeking the truth, reading this information may provide more insight into the character of Kamala Harris...
1. TOUGH ON CRIME
So, Harris is not for decriminalizing border crossings, but said before, "I would not prosecute illegal immigrants coming into the country. That is 2 contradictory statements? Which is it?
***Kamala ranted about how she prosecuted cartels in her job as District Attorney, yet I found evidence from a reliable source, another California Attorney, who has met and researched her record as a prosecutor. Although she oversaw many prosecutions by other lawyers, Harris did not personally prosecute the cases (a lie). And Kamala's claim that she was a tough prosecutor on crime is misleading too. Her trial experience in all those years as an Attorney in California totaled 10 cases!
And a good number of all these prosecutions Kamala was a part of were for marijuana possession, affecting the minority population Harris so proudly says she is aligned with. (Note- at the time California did not legalize marijuana)
-That seems to me a misrepresenting of the facts ... Right!
2. IMMIGRATION-ILLEGAL FREEBIES
Harris endorsed allowing illegals to apply for driver's licenses, to get free tuition at colleges, and receive free health care. When asked by Baier about this position, Kamala would not say if she still supported these things.
***Her only response to Baier was I will follow the law. MY REACTION: Either you still support what you said before or you changed your mind, which is it?
When Baier brought up the fact her running mate Governor "knucklehead" Walz signed those very policies into law in Minnesota this was her response.
***QUOTE: "We are very clear, I am very clear, as is Tim Walz, that we must support and enforce Federal law, and that is exactly what we will do." Now that's one big CHEF SALAD ANSWER which provides no insight and my bet one big lie!
CONCLUSION- Kamala Harris was evasive and confrontational to her interviewer who was only trying to get clarity on her positions. Baier never asked Harris a question about Trump in the entire interview, (a sit-down which was supposed to focus on her policies and vision), yet a good portion of Kamala's answers were blaming Trump for everything. Not a smart way to appeal to conservatives, moderates and undecideds watching this interview...
MORE FOX INTERVIEW TOPICS TO FOLLOW
Photo- You Tube
3 people like this
2 responses
@RasmaSandra (80030)
• Daytona Beach, Florida
19 Oct
Thanks fro the review. I don't know what to make of her.
2 people like this
@dgobucks226 (35633)
•
20 Oct
You welcome. Liar, unqualified and phony come to mind.
2 people like this
@porwest (91311)
• United States
27 Oct
As I wrote about Harris' response in a blog about the interview, which interestingly I also broke into multiple parts, hen Baier posed the question about Walz putting into law the very things she now says she opposes, I said this was a real deer in the headlights moment complete with at least a three second pause as her brain tried desperately to come up with answer. One that was, as we both know, not an answer at all but still rather telling, nonetheless.
1 person likes this
@dgobucks226 (35633)
•
28 Oct
So true, it's like she is looking through a rolodex to find an address, or in this case how to come up with an on-the-spot answer. Unfortunately, for her that rolodex provides no context or detail. Like Harris's ability to answer specifically any question with specifics, it becomes an "empty vessel."
1 person likes this
@porwest (91311)
• United States
29 Oct
@dgobucks226 She forever clutches at straws. Her answers, which of course are never really answers, are so obviously just utterances of things she was told to memorize. Nothing is necessarily, "off the cuff," so to speak, and when it is, you get the real Kamala Harris complete with croutons and dressing.
1 person likes this