Speaker Mike Johnson says that federal aid to California should be "conditional"

@NJChicaa (120816)
United States
January 14, 2025 3:50pm CST
so that they give up their green energy ideas, they rake the forests, they turn on whatever imaginary water faucet Trump's been rambling about. . . and so Democrats in government agree to raise the debt ceiling. Sure--in the wake of a major national disaster let's play politics. Seems to me that Johnson's home state of Louisiana received billions upon billions after Hurricane Katrina and other hurricane disasters. I saw a Senator today say that it was upwards of $120 billion dollars. So many voted against aid after Superstorm Sandy hit this exact area in New Jersey back in 2012. Those red states want all of the disaster aid until something terrible happens to a blue state. It is gross. Like aren't you supposed to be working for ALL Americans? President Biden is already surging federal support and even stimulus checks to residents who have been impacted. He has promised the full support of the federal government. Unfortunately that full support will end on January 20. Then those victims of a natural disaster will be political pawns. That is evil. Go for it Johnson. Your position as Speaker of the House is already tenuous enough. And for those red state legislators from Florida, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, etc. . . this insanity will be remembered the next time your state gets hit with disastrous floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, etc. It will be remembered and then disaster aid will be passed unconditionally if Democrats are in control because they aren't awful. Too bad the same can't be said for you and your red states who rely on federal $$ provided by the blue states.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/01/13/house-speaker-mike-johnson-california-wildfire-aid/77681997007/
2 people like this
2 responses
@porwest (94811)
• United States
15 Jan
What happened in California? The people in that state voted for Gavin Newsome. So, 6 years ago Donald Trump arranged a deal to get millions of gallons of water to fill California's empty reservoirs for their fire hydrants. Guess what Gavin Newsome did. He told Trump they didn't need the water and refused to sign the agreement. As a result of that, firefighters went to tap the fire hydrants, but there was no water. Now, does that make it right to refuse assistance or even provide for "conditions?" Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. But what it SHOULD do is send a clear message to Californians that maybe they should pick better leaders next time. I mean, how long has the federal government been cleaning up California's messes and how long should taxpayers have to flip the bill for? At some point, maybe a little hard knocks is what is needed to get the point across. If you keep picking dunces to lead you, don't come crying to us when those dunces lead you into deep, dark trenches with no way out. I am not saying it's right. But who is in the real wrong here. Mike Johnson for saying, "Hey, wait a minute," or Gavin Newsome for refusing the water he was offered when Trump offered it to him that six years later STILL was not there for the hydrants? I mean, think about it. These idiots refuse to clear brush and have fire hydrants with no water supply. Then they have a massive fire that burns down entire cities and we're supposed to just go, "Sorry to hear that, here's help despite some VERY stupid decisions." While we're at it, why don't we discuss the $770 Biden is offering for victims of the fires. Billions to Ukraine but your house burns down and you get a check for under $1000. Thanks, Biden. For nothing. But of course, we won't talk about Gavin's mistakes or Biden's good for nothing help, but we WILL call out Johnson for saying, maybe we should have conditions. Give me a break.
1 person likes this
@NJChicaa (120816)
• United States
15 Jan
So do you also fault the residents of New Orleans for living below sea level and getting pummeled by Katrina? Or people in Florida who live smack in the path of so many hurricanes? What about those who live in Tornado Alley? It is unconscionable for politicians to try to politicize disaster aid based on their political beliefs. These are Americans who need assistance. F the politics. Many southern Republicans voted against aid for this area after Sandy. They asked for it right away when hurricanes hit their states though. I was just going through FB memories for today and found this quote from former GOP rep from NJ: "To my colleagues ... who have decided that we need to change the rules of the game, shame on you. Florida, good luck with no more hurricanes. California, congratulations, did you get rid of the San Andreas fault? The Mississippi is in a drought. You think you're not going to have a flood again? Who are you going to come to when you have these things?"
1 person likes this
@NJChicaa (120816)
• United States
16 Jan
@porwest How exactly was Newsom supposed to prevent a power tower from igniting? How exactly was Newsom supposed to control the Santa Ana winds?
1 person likes this
@porwest (94811)
• United States
16 Jan
@NJChicaa That's a different situation. Those are and were people who make their own choices that endanger themselves willingly and knowingly. In the case of California, the GOVERNMENT, who people entrust their safety to, made these decisions that caused them to be endangered. Hurricanes are natural disasters. No one can prevent them. Wildfires, in the case of California cannot be ENTIRELY prevented. But they CAN be allowed to become more severe and more possible to become out of control situations if you make decisions that CAUSE them to become more severe and out of control. Tornados are also NATURAL DISASTERS. People choose to live in any of these areas fully aware there may be tornados, earthquakes, hurricanes, typhoons or any other naturally occurring event you can think of. I live in an area rich in abandoned mines. I know I am subject to mine subsidence and even being sucked into a sinkhole. A woman was recently killed in Missouri when she had a lost cat, went looking for it, and was found 30 feet buried from a sinkhole that opened up beneath her feet. As for politicizing catastrophic events, who does that? Ah. The MEDIA does. When Katrina happened the media couldn't wait to blame it all on Bush. When Covid happened they couldn't wait to blame it all on Trump. But in California? Gavin Newsome responsible? Nah. Give him a pass and go and blame republicans for other things they did that have nothing to do with the situation at hand in California. If a Republican is in charge the media says, "How COULD he? What a lowlife POS with no heart." But in California, because it's a Democrat, "He is doing all he can," and as Harris said, "We need to have patience, these things take time." They didn't say that when Katrina happened. But they DID say it when the train derailed in Palestine, Ohio. Why? Again, because it wasn't Republicans who were in charge when it happened. NO ONE politicizes disasters better than Democrats, and they not only jump at the chance, they LEAP at it.
1 person likes this
@FourWalls (70230)
• United States
14 Jan
I guess on the condition that they keep paying their money to the federal government? Listen, a LONG time ago (I’m talking the mid-70s), I heard McLean Stevenson say on the Tonight Show *when he was guest hosting it) that California was like a granola bar: fruits, nuts, and flakes. It’s always been that way. HOWEVER, as long as it’s part of the UNITED STATES it qualifies for federal aid. I’m really sick of people playing politics with disasters, like those reports of police telling people NOT to help Helene victims if they had Harris/Walz signs in the yard. I despise the man; however, I am an American, and on January 20th he’ll be MY president. My citizenry, my devotion to my country — and, for that matter, how I live my life — is totally independent of the temporary occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
1 person likes this
@NJChicaa (120816)
• United States
15 Jan
You have class and I appreciate that.
1 person likes this