Lack of iron fist that brooks no dissent
By princeking
@princeking (29)
India
December 3, 2006 9:08am CST
STATEMENT No. 1
America invaded Iraq and due to that there is chaos there.
STATEMENT No. 2
Americal invaded Iraq and Saddam Hussain was removed from power and due to that there is chaos there.
Eventhough both statements look correct, the second statement conveys the real problem.
The absence of an iron fist that brooks no dissent is what causes chaos there.
STATEMENT No. 3
American action has not caused the chaos, but it has removed the 'iron fist that brooks no dissent' and that is causing the problem.
Is this logic sensible?
No responses
