is dhoom II is as good as dhoom I
By manohar1310
@manohar1310 (364)
India
12 responses
@niteshambuj (148)
•
13 Dec 06
It's almost the same.... I din't find much difference..
1 person likes this
@ndraj_2006 (1422)
• India
13 Dec 06
IF you compare the two then dhoom 2 is much better.
Because, the movie is well picturised in foriegn countries.In india also it has not been picturised in slums & normal roads like dhoom 1. The Effects & actions are far better than part 1.
@gkrisiyer (393)
• India
13 Dec 06
i just saw bits and pieces of both movies.and both of them are bad.i think bollywood is a real hype unless they come up with movies like RDB,Yuva etc
@manohar1310 (364)
• India
15 Dec 06
do not think so there must be difference in the movies other wise audience wil get boar
@Serjas (2328)
• India
20 Jan 07
i love hrithik in dhoom2 and john in dhoom.i also like the theme(i know it is inspired from french film"taxi",later remade in english with same title) also action scenes.
but i simply hate the direction...many scenes are taken from hollywood...i heard dhoom3 will be directed by aditya chopra. i belive he can make it good
i wish farhan akhtar direct the film,it will be more entertaining
i want realistic action scenes(like don) in dhoom3.
@Mubashar1988 (1825)
• Pakistan
13 Dec 06
yes! as i expected it , it really was superb as Dhoom I, both are the fully vrooooooooming, i love both
@BLACKBLADE (293)
• Pakistan
23 Dec 06
Welll....for DHOOM II i can say CRAZY KIA RE...and for DHOOM I i can just say DHOOM MACHALE....
in my opinion DHOOM II is also good but not as DHOOM I
@ponnamma (150)
• India
11 Jan 07
yes itz far more better than dhoom..hrithik had done a fantastic job in dhoom 2 .there may be lack of good script but the acting of hrithik made viewers forget all flaws in it.he is the emperor of acting and style.what a great personality and mind blowing performance.he over ruled abhishek all the way..junior bachan is nothing infront of hrithik..hats off to hrithik
