Why ban Guns, but not Cameras?

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
December 17, 2006 5:46pm CST
They're both in animate objects. Both are "point and shoot". I can use either to feed or destroy someone. Both can be used for good or bad acts. It's not the object itself that is the problem, but how we use them... So why should one be banned but not the other?
2 responses
sunita64
@sunita64 (6469)
• India
18 Dec 06
By camera you can defame a person but cannot kill the person.
1 person likes this
ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 Dec 06
Either way you have destroyed that person's life.
ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 Dec 06
along with the lives of those who love them.
shooie
@shooie (4984)
• United States
18 Dec 06
I agree with you one 100%. A Camera can be life threatening...look at the idiots that chase stars around not caring for anyone else that is around them because they have to get that million dollar shot....
1 person likes this
ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 Dec 06
Exactly, if it weren't for cameras, Princess Diana would be alive today!