Why do we need to bother stopping Global Warming?
By matt608
@matt608 (843)
December 19, 2006 2:08pm CST
In the long run it makes no difference to anything. There have been ice ages every 12000 years or so for the last 1.5 billion years and we are just about 'due' for another one. Global warming is if anything, postponing it. We are just the dominant species in this brief interglacial, so why are we trying to stop global warming when it is prolonging our doom?
2 people like this
5 responses
@uvbnskoold (499)
• Canada
19 Dec 06
I'm going to get a lot of flak about this, but here's my view:
Global warming does not exist! It is a lie put forth by these so called "green" companies and other environmental zealots. There is just no genuine proof of it at all.
How arrogant are we to believe that we can cause something like this? Mother nature has been dealing with it's inhabitants for billions of years and has been through many things. She can cope with our short-comings.
1 person likes this
@matt608 (843)
•
19 Dec 06
I do PARTIALLY agree with you. I think global warming is definatly a real phenomenon caused by us, but it is not like it will make the world explode lol. It will cause dramatic changes to our lifestyles for the next 1000 or so years, then there will be an iceage again due to the 'not quite straight' orbit of our planet, and who knows what after that.
@julie0825 (1414)
• Philippines
20 Dec 06
we have to be worried as it heats the whole earth werent you not worried
@VKXY62 (1605)
• Australia
3 Nov 07
G'day mate, hmm lemme see here, about 40,000 years ago the sea level rose a whopping 300 feet, and has pretty much stayed there since. That was global warming.
Ancient civilizations responsible for that disaster must be held responsible (tongue in cheeck).
They had too many cows and pigs passing wind.
All the evidence for this is right where they left it. As usual humans are lazy and don't want to go far for their food or water, they lived near rivers and coast lines, all of which are now 300 feet below the oceans surface, all their remains are still there, we just gotta go and find them, I'd really laugh if they found big rusty submerged factories and cities, I know the villages and towns must exist, but wouldn't the self destroyed high tech civilization be a blast.
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
20 Dec 06
I'm not convinced global warming isn't natural. Obviously temperature is going to vary over the millions of years in the Earth's history.
I don't see too much of a problem in the long term because I don't think its a real problem.
@uvbnskoold (499)
• Canada
20 Dec 06
I agree with you. I know we are definately heating the planet in certain areas, and a lot of it has to do with the Urban Heat Island effect. Basically means that cities are often hotter than rural areas due to the amount of steel and concrete and other metals. But the interesting part is that it's not consistent: there are areas where the rural areas are actually hotter than cities.
Anyone that says that we're "melting the polar ice caps" or we're melting the ice in greenland is probably only interested in asking you for money to support their cause. Ice melts and reforms, it's the natural way the world works. They will claim that it's the burning of fossil fuels that is causing it but what they don't tell you is that the ice caps in greenland have been melting for thousands of years! So it's definately nothing we're doing... though we are not exactly helping the environment.
1 person likes this
@TKDSquid (56)
• United States
19 Dec 06
I agree. I believe global warming may be a natural climatic cycle for our planet. A cycle that is so long that we have no previous record of it. I'm not sure what Al Gore is using as evidense to support his argument about global warming but I'm finding more evidence in my college classes that it is a normal cycle. I have found there are more immediate concerns. What we need to concentrate on is balancing the natural environmental cycles that our industrialized society has disturbed. There are 4 major environmental cycles that we directly effect: Nitrogen cycle, Carbon Cycle, Water cycle, Sulfur Cycle. We affect these cycles with fertlizer use, pesticides, burning of fossil fuels and irrigation. The list of factors and interactions is incredibly long but they cause greater and more immediate environmental damage than gloabl warming if we continue to destablize these natural cycles.
1 person likes this