Britney, her underwear and my stupidity
By lucalucky
@lucalucky (1839)
Italy
December 20, 2006 12:47pm CST
I didn't want it. I din't ask for it. But she did and alla serious newspaper reported that. I am curious and searched it and I saw it. My mistake.
Now I know:
1) Britney Spears doesn't use underwear;
2) she is friend of Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan;
3) that she did it before;
4) that someone is thinking that she did it to be published on the news.
Good. Now I know this things and also that I am stupid. I know (ore or less) who is Britney Spears, who is Paris Hilton and still I don't know who is Lindsay Lohan but I know how Britney is under her dress. The most important thing that now I know is that I am too much courious and (but I knew that before) that this things are not interesting to me.
Did you make the same mistake?
2 people like this
3 responses
@fcrifcri (122)
• Italy
22 Dec 06
You don't have to think to be stupid. It's normal, the news about Britney Spears and her underwear (or better, not underwear) was in all newspaper in the world. A lot of people made exactly like you. I am one of them but I don't feel stupid. The news was stupid but so stupid that it became interesting. Don't worry for this!
@lucalucky (1839)
• Italy
22 Dec 06
Thanks, but I feel still a bit stupid loosing time reading about her underwear!
@utsadetti (4589)
• United States
3 Jan 07
So what is your impression to see britney under her dress? Is she sexy? i don't think she is too sexy, though.
@lucalucky (1839)
• Italy
15 Jan 07
No, she is not sexy at all. My impression... well I feel a voyeur!
@mytwo_daughters (2663)
• United States
16 Jan 07
I think the world is getting more and more voyeuristic, and why?? Some because of curiosity, some because of media, some because of the celebs themselves. You weren't the only one curious I am sure, and it is only human nature to be curious. Where would we be without it? However, we could have done without Britneys, and Paris' non undie flashes to the media, and everywhere else.
