Shahrukh or Hritik?who's the best?
By sambit1984
@sambit1984 (10)
India
December 20, 2006 9:37pm CST
As I've seen Shahrukh n Hritik can do any type of characters offered to them. But still one difference lies between them.Can u find out that????????????
6 responses
@besthope44 (12123)
• India
4 Jun 10
Well both have own styles and talents. The most hit movies lacks between both.
@Queen_31 (94)
• India
2 Feb 07
Its oviously Hritik who is the best because he is quite natural and does quality acting. but shahrukh ? Oh my God he has just not learnt how to talk and he has an artificial character and he tries to use it in every sphere of acting which is bad.What do u think about this???
@danish160 (250)
• Pakistan
21 Dec 06
There is no comparison of Shahrukh and Hrithink. Hrithik is only admried because of his good looks and physique while shahrukh has good loks as well as great acting skills.
@lagan_OO7 (33)
• India
21 Dec 06
Hrithik is Roshan is far better than this man Shah rukh Khan. Well why iam saying this is because shah Rukh Khan never justifies the role or the character offered to him. The problem with Shah Rukh is that he never plays the character he always plays Shah Rukh Khan in all of his movies there are so many different kinds of roles and characters offered to him but he has never been able to portray them in the manner he should have he has always played shah rukh being in the skins of his character. But yes there are exceptions too when he has played the character very well but that was in the very early stages of his career when he played Darr, and Baazigar but since then onwards it has been the same way around you take DDLJ, Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, Dil To Pagal Hai, Devdas, Mohabbattein, Ashoka, Veer Zaara, Kal Ho Naa Ho, Kabhi Khusi Kabhi Gham, Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna all these movies offered him a variety of characters but except one film veer Zara Shah Rukh has Always played each of the other characters similarly without any difference. Thats why i feel Shah Rukh is limited he is very typed and he lives all his characters within himself.
Whereas Hrithik roshan is in sharp contrast with this feature of Shah Rukh, Hrithik always plays his character in the manner they should be played he always does justice to the offered role he always acts to perfection you name all his movies from Kaho Naa Pyar Hai, Fiza, Yaadein, Mission Kashmir, Aap Mujhe Achche Lagne Lage, Na Tum Jano Na Hum, Mujhse Dosti Karoge, Kabhi Khusi Kabhi Gham, Mein Prem Ki Diwani Hoon, Koi Mil Gaya, Lakshya, Krrish and Dhoom 2 in all these movies he had been offered a variety of roles each with different charcter especially the movies Kaho Naa Pyar Hai where he played a lover boy to perfection, then came along Kabhi Khushi Gham where he played the younger brother youthful charcter to perfection, in Lakshya he played the perfect spoilt kid who turns into a Great Armyman, and the best ever performance so far came along in Loi Mil Gaya where he played the mentally retarded boys character to perfection, and then the transformation to a super hero in Krrish and now the latest of his movies Dhoom 2 in which he plays a clever cool daring theif to perfection. Other traits of Hrithik being a more complete actor than Shah Rukh Kahn is his physique, his dancing skills which are the best the indian film has to offer today.
So this above debate clearly shows that Hrithik Roshan is far better than Shah Rukh Khan and by this is the Best.
@soumodeep (944)
• India
28 Dec 06
Shah Rukh Khan can only cry and can't do any different types of role. He can only cry and sob and etc etc. Hrithik on the other hand has done variety of roles and has given what the roles need to be given. He has acted as a superhero, super villain, terrorist, army person, mentally retarded kid, and many more. He's playing a emperor in the coming movie.