whats the difference between ASP and ASP.net
By humaaaa
@humaaaa (1386)
Pakistan
11 responses
@ironmanxsl (12)
• United States
4 Feb 07
humaaaa-- I'm glad you asked this so I can clarify =)
The real question is what are the similarities between ASP and ASP.NET
ASP.NET is inclusive of ASP, it holds ASP within its framework of many languages. ASP.NET has its own web controls and form controls to offer dynamicness on webpages. ASP.NET blends in the technologies of clientside with server side into one product. ASP.NET contains not only ASP but C#, VB.NET, JScript.NET, etc.
This website runs on ASP.NET =)
1 person likes this
@DillonMoore (22)
• United States Minor Outlying Islands
11 Oct 13
ASP.NET could be run on non-Microsoft Platforms also. Cassini is a sample Web server produced by Microsoft which, among other projects, has been used to host ASP.NET with Apache.
@manu_ghimire (2626)
• India
22 Dec 06
asp is active server pages !
and asp.net is active server pages from .net plateform
@kalli1in2002 (19)
• India
21 Mar 07
main difference is .net itself....you ll know the difference when you program.
its much easier to program using .net
@ursfriend (218)
• United States
3 Apr 07
ASP.NET is more object oriented and based on .net architecture....it sperates code and view which lacked in traditional asp.
In traditional asp, you have to write both code and view in same file, now in .net, these two things become different...you have on file for code and other for UI
hope it helps..plz do respond
@DillonMoore (22)
• United States Minor Outlying Islands
11 Oct 13
ASP.NET could be run on non-Microsoft Platforms also. Cassini is a sample Web server produced by Microsoft which, among other projects, has been used to host ASP.NET with Apache.
@Eiloin (327)
•
4 Feb 07
Of what I know, ASP.Net is the evolution of ASP language. I have read in the following url that:
ASP.NET has better language support,a large set of new controls and XML based omponents, and better user authentication.
ASP.NET provides increased performance y running compiled code.
ASP.NET code is not fully backward compatible with ASP
http://www.w3schools.com/aspnet/aspnet_vsasp.asp
I hope this helps
@todwalrohit (116)
• India
17 Feb 07
the major difference is that asp.net support .net platform but asp doesnt
another differences are:
1. asp.net support oops concept but asp doesnt
2. asp.net support can be used with c# and vb.net as well but asp cant
3. asp.net supports event driven programming and xml format but asp doesnt
4. asp.net is easy to use but asp is quite typical
and many more differences available
overall we can say that asp.net is strong, fully controlled and very much easy to use with better controls than asp.
@softwind (197)
• Romania
15 Feb 07
Some of the shortcomings of classic ASP:
-interpreted and loosely-typed code;
-collaboration is difficult because of the mixing of ASP code with HTML;
-limited debugging tools;
and others.
Benefits of ASP .NET:
-compiled code;
-separation of code from HTML;
-XML configurations files
-graphical development environment
and others.
@chhaganbhujbad (263)
• United States
15 Feb 07
I am not exactly sure...
But sometimes when you build a website, and you end your pages in .asp and sometimes you end in .asp.net...
I believe .asp.net would be for a broad network in the website... I am not exactly sure about it.. but when I find out, I will let uou know about it...