Do you believe in censorship?
@ItTakesAllSorts (4096)
December 22, 2006 8:04pm CST
I am watching the film A Clockwork Orange and cannot understand why it was banned for so many years. Should we be told by certain groups of people what is acceptable for us to view or not. As adults do we not have the right to decide for ourselves.
3 people like this
6 responses
@Eskimo (2315)
•
15 Aug 07
I must disagree, I think some films should be censored. Without censorship then some filmakers always strive to go just that little bit further with every new film made, the audience watching them also become desensitised over the years, what would horrify 10 years ago, is now treated as normal.
This may be just one reason why there is so much evil in the world, and it seems to be increasing.
As films is such a powerful media then there must be guidelines for what is suitable for showing (and to whom it is acceptable), Censors have to be able to check the films to ensure that the guidlines are being followed.
2 people like this
@ItTakesAllSorts (4096)
•
19 Aug 07
Well I have to say I became a censor myself yesterday when my son was watching jackass 2. I have heard of these films and I thought it was just stupid idiots doing stunts, but what I saw turned my stomach and I stopped him from watching it as he is too young to witness stuff like this.
When he is old enough to watch these films then fine, but as a responsible parent I intervened. If you haven't seen it, don't bother. These blokes are rich off of this tripe.
However, I still would not ban it.
@Adrenochrome (1653)
•
16 Aug 07
A Clockwork Orange was only banned in the UK because the English director, Stanley Kubrick, had it banned, feeling the British weren't ready for such a film. Probably based on the trouble that critics stirred up when it was originally released here.
Fortunately, about 10 years ago, Britain got a new head of censorship for cinema, and he gave certificates to many of the films, videos and DVDs that had been banned or cut by the censors. That is why you can now buy the Babycart series, and 'I spit on your grave' (the author of the book, Boris Vian, an existentialist, was fined 10,000 Fr upon the novels release in the 1950s, too!).
Censorship is contrary to freedom of speech, and if a film does not actually tell people to go out and kill someone, then it should be free from state tampering.
1 person likes this
@ItTakesAllSorts (4096)
•
16 Aug 07
What a cheek of Mr Kubrick and there was me thinking it was Mrs Whitehouse!!
I definately agree with your last statement too.
@KrazyKlingon (5005)
• United States
14 Aug 07
I do not kno wif this falls under censorship, but the only freedom of speech that might be good not to have is the freedom to lie about someone or something, or letting out someone's private secrets.
Lying is not only considered immoral, but even if it is NOT true, at times, it would still haunt the victim, & when the truth does come out, it will also haunt the liar by not having as much, if any at all, credibility when he says something. Also, friends of the victim, &/or the victim as well, may even have some evil things in store for the liar.
When someone's secret is out, it can ruin/destroy someone. Even if it is true, some things are just better left private. THe same also applies to companies that sell people's information to mailing list companies. The result is that even though they get a bit of cash from that, all they're doing is inconveniencing those who were on those lists by getting more junk to take care of, & when the company that sold it gets called out, it usually hurts.
1 person likes this
@ItTakesAllSorts (4096)
•
15 Aug 07
I agree totally with you. I can accept someone being a meany at times, but a liar is someone you just can't trust. I really don't see the point in lying full stop.
Cheers my friend.
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
23 Dec 06
Of course censorship is bad. Censoring shouldn't be done. I can understand keeping adult materials away from children and cleaning up the public airwaves to ensure that it is indeed a choice of adults to see/hear such material instead of children overhearing it or sneaking it.
1 person likes this
@lucky_witch (2707)
• Philippines
17 Aug 07
Hmmm. Iguess that would depend on the laws in your country. MAybe censorship is important for morality purposes. Like those young adult that will be able to watch... lets face it... even if we are entitled to decide... films have greater influence into the society and may lead to some crimes like rapes etc...
@thathalazarini (486)
• Brazil
17 Sep 07
I don't agree with censorship specially in my country where people just don't know and don't understand what's REALLY necessary to be banned
1 person likes this
@ItTakesAllSorts (4096)
•
17 Sep 07
I agree with you. it is a handful of people who decide what we can and cannot watch,,we all have different tastes, so should be able to make up our own minds.