Fetal Down Syndrome Screening Advised
By Slim_Shady
@Slim_Shady (668)
Romania
January 1, 2007 5:15pm CST
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is advising all pregnant women to undergo Down syndrome testing of their unborn children.
The health organization's newest practice guidelines says testing for the genetic disorder should take place for all women during the first trimester of their pregnancies, the Los Angeles Times reported.
The decision comes in the wake of new non-invasive screening tests for Down syndrome, limiting dangerous invasive tests to those women identified as high risk.
Such key changes in the testing for the disorder come from the integration of blood and nuchal translucency tests that substantially increase the chances of a woman's risk level regarding Down syndrome.
The newspaper said prior to this year's practice guidelines, the health group had only offered the tests to those pregnant women over the age of 35 who were believed to be at a higher risk.
4 people like this
14 responses
@cblackink (969)
• United States
2 Jan 07
So, if they discover your baby has this problem, what then? Will they tell you this so you can make a decision to terminate your pregnancy? Or is it just to be forewarned? Maybe it's just me, but it smacks of "Big Brother". Who's to say women won't use this as a reason to abort their children, just because they don't want to deal with having to raise a child with a problem.
1 person likes this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
2 Jan 07
There's only 2 reasons for this test: to prepare for a down syndrome child; or to abort. It is "genetic screening" and eugenics.
1 person likes this
@imadriscoll (2228)
• United States
2 Jan 07
Can you really prepare yourself to have a child with Downs Syndrome? I don't think that anything really prepares you for that news. I think that "Big Brother" wants us to eliminate children with Downs ... so that they don't become a "burden" to society.
I would never consent to having a test like this because no matter what I'll love my child ... this is just a way for people to feel "ok" about aborting a baby.
1 person likes this
@shoelover (896)
• Australia
2 Jan 07
At least with this test you can prepare yourself for a child with Downs Syndrome. You can then be tested to see which partner would carry the chromosone so you would know if any future children would also have this extra chromosone.
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
1 Jan 07
Hi Slim_Shady, I have the same discussion topic posted early this morning. This testing for down syndrome recommended for all pregnant women in the first trimester is called chorionic villi biopsy or sampling. The procedure is not new, and has been used for at least 10 years, maybe closer to 15. There is one thing you state which makes absolutely NO SENCE, which is "Such key changes in the testing for the disorder come from the integration of blood and nuchal translucency tests that substantially increase the chances of a woman's risk level regarding Down syndrome."
Down syndrome is a chromosomal disorder that is not hereditary, but a "mistake" in the genetic makeup of a person. There is nothing about tests that "substantially increase the chances of a woman's risk level regarding Down syndrome". Amniocentisis is the previous procedure used to test for and diagnose Down syndrome, and involves a large needle inserted into the amniotic sac containing the preborn baby and amniotic fluids, then removing the fluids to be tested for the baby's DNA. The "new" test does not involve puncturing the maternal body, but instead, cuts away pieces of the placenta, the chorionic villi. Risks of infection, miscarriage, and more,are associated with this "new" test.
1 person likes this
@cheree (10)
• United States
2 Jan 07
It's still sounds really scary. What if u don't have a child with down syndrome but they test u because you r high risk and u loose the baby because of the procedure. What is the percentage of this happening to those women i wonder. I think it's great that they have a new method but i just wish they didn't have to involve those risks because even if the baby is down syndrome if they keep it what diference did it make for the women now she knows but it doesn't fix the problem does it?
They r making laws agains abortion so if she doesn't want to keep it are we then going to have a ton of down syndrome children in orphanages or up for adoption!
1 person likes this
@birthlady (5609)
• United States
2 Jan 07
Yes, it's scary to me also, and to many pregnant moms. I've never met or talked to a pregnant mom who will abort because of down syndrome. When a pregnant mom asks me, and I explain to her, as above, she refuses the test because she wants her baby no matter what. I know many Down syndrome people, they are loving, & wonderful.
1 person likes this
@not4me (1711)
• United States
2 Jan 07
I don't get the purpose. It sounds like this group is perhaps a little abortion happy. I mean if they find out the baby has Down Syndrome there is nothing they can do. The old mom knew the risks and decided to get pregnant anyway, so what's the point? You will find out soon enough IMHO.
1 person likes this
@shoelover (896)
• Australia
1 Jan 07
It is a good idea. Many women of younger ages have down syndrome babies. My daughter has one and she was only 19 when she had him. The pregnancy was diagnosed in all the usual tests as a normal fetus. Nobody knew until he was born. We love him as he is my 1st grandchild. He is a little bit slower at doing things but to me he is a normal happy child. His smile is worth a thousand words.
@Slim_Shady (668)
• Romania
1 Jan 07
i wish your grandson the best in the world !
1 person likes this
@penelope1613 (84)
• United States
2 Jan 07
I AM ABOUT ALMOST 3 MONTHS PREGNANT AND I TOOK SOME TESTS I'M NOT SURE IF I TOOK ONE FOR DOWN SYNDROME, BUT I DO KNOW THEY TOOK OUT A LOT OF BLOOD AND TESTED FOR NUMEROUS THINGS TO MAKE SURE THE BABY WOULD BE OK. THE TEST CAME BACK WITH GOOD RESULTS SO MY BABY SHOULD BE FINE.
1 person likes this
@Slim_Shady (668)
• Romania
2 Jan 07
may u're baby live a long healty and happy life !
1 person likes this
@sweetbabe77 (224)
• Philippines
2 Jan 07
any pregnant women has a high risk of having a down syndorme child.All we have to do is to be carefull of what are we taking in our body, so proper supplementation is needed.
@Slim_Shady (668)
• Romania
2 Jan 07
But if the supplementation are making he fat ... do u think she would take them ?
1 person likes this
@wahmoftwo (1296)
• United States
2 Jan 07
I was offered some sort of blood test and I was only twenty when I was carrying my son, but opted not to have it since I didn't want to make decisions about terminating a pregnancy based on a test result. Thankfully my child is healthy. I think each women should decide individually what is best for her and her unborn child.
1 person likes this
@bonnielass (484)
• United States
2 Jan 07
I got the test with all the babies. Not to have an abortion but if the child is sick. It will have the very best care when born as soon as its born not having to wait for tests. I think that is a good idea.
1 person likes this
@micki38120 (61)
• United States
2 Jan 07
I think it's a personal decision whether or not to have this test. What if the results are positive? The plus side of this is that you will have time to educate yourself before the baby arrives on the condition and how to care for the child. My daughter was offered a screening for cystic fibrosis during her pregnancy and she refused the test. The doctor was quite upset and rude with her. However her reasoning was that there was no family history, there was nothing that could be done to change it, and she would not abort even if the test was positive. Needless to say, she changed doctors.
1 person likes this
@tahiyya123456 (534)
• United States
24 Jan 07
They offered me this test with my last son told me that my levels showed high risk and that i should report to the office immediately. I denied the test and my baby turned out healthy and if he didnt he would still be a blessing to me all things are in Allah's (God) hand.
1 person likes this
@Muslimah (811)
• United States
2 Jan 07
when i was preagnent i went to the doctors and they asked me if i wanted to take this test. i asked what is it about (i found it strange they would ask i thought something was wrong) so they said its a test that may or may not determine if the baby has down syndrome. So you know i got scared ...thinking she wouldnt have asked me this if it wasnt signs leading up to this test. so the doc tells me " no there werent any signes its a new test and we (as doctors) are suppose to ask if you want to take it. then she broke down that if you take the test and it comes back positive you have the option at a early stage of preagnency to abort the baby. and if it comes back negitive then no problem. so i said no i didnt want to take it. if the baby came out with a problem, i would have to deal with that. I think its a shame ... this test is saying that people with down syndrome dont fit into the "NORM" of society and they offer you the option of getting rid of a "Problem" early on. Good post take care.
1 person likes this
@MamaRoo (3)
• United States
26 Jan 07
I am assuming that the test you are talking of here is the Triple screen or AFP testing where they draw blood and send it off to get a result. I just wanted to let you know that even with this test their are false positives and you could get the result that you have an elevated risk of having a child with Down Syndrome and actually be caring a healthy baby. I did do this test and I am only 24yrs old. My results came back with an elevated risk of my child having Down Syndrome after doing a high level ultrasound it came back that my child is very unlikely to have Down syndrome. So in my opinion unless you are set on the fact that if you have a child with a disorder you are going to abort then the test is a fairly big waste of time and causes much undue stress. Even my physician informed me that their are a high number of false positives with this test. Why they preform this test in unknown to me.
1 person likes this