Organic vs. non-organic - is there really a difference?
By LaLaLisa
@LaLaLisa (29)
United States
January 2, 2007 5:55pm CST
Ok, so we all know Organic food costs more than non-organic, but is it really worth it? What products are better to buy organic than not?
My gut tells me that produce and dairy would be the best choice for buying organic, but that's just a guess. You can buy organic macoroni and cheese and even organic spaghetti o's these days. They are more expensive, but are they really that much better?
I've heard (and experienced) organic food tasting better, and totally agree with that point. Sometimes, though, I'd buy a box of Kraft Mac 'n Cheese for .50 and "settle" for the taste than pay almost $3 for a box of organic stuff. The cost really adds up when you are on a budget!
I've found a great selection of organic food at Farmer's Market (seasonally) and local co-op's and whole foods markets, while the organic selection at large chain grocery stores is very limited and the food is a lot older.
1 response
@elater (3)
• United States
7 Jan 07
The opposite of organic (plants and animals) is inorganic (rocks and minerals). There are growers who have borrowed the "organic" word to state that they grow thier crops or animals without "artificial" or man made products. The plants and animals cannot distinguish the difference. There is also no discernable difference in the products whichever way they are grown. Unfortunately, there is more chance of e coli problems with fresh "organically" grown produce. Animal wastes contain e coli. More diligent washing of "organically" grown produce is warranted.