Is 20-20 format of the game better than 50 over matches

India
January 4, 2007 1:20am CST
Well i feel the 20-20 games gives faster results and is very entertaining but it does not test the real callibre of the batsmen.People like Dravid would fail miserably.50 over format of the game is much better than the 20-20 format.What do u ssay??
2 responses
aryan20
@aryan20 (74)
• India
4 Jan 07
yes very much like it.20/20 can never replace the 50 over format of the game.Just think about the bowlers.They will be having nightmares.I think the existing format of the game is the best.It's a perfect platform to display your talent .
usman400
@usman400 (1587)
• Pakistan
4 Jan 07
I dont think so, this will limit the things attached to the game, i.e. ppl involvment, time spent for typical cricekt will be slow and yes u r right but its not a thing for dravid or alike batsmen it will have a universal effect i.e. every player would have a licenese to be panic out there for 20/20 game, hence it will effect its patience and the talent will be overwasted in this case