cricket or football
By joshua_77
@joshua_77 (612)
India
31 responses
@janeshrathod (104)
• India
6 Jan 07
football is better for health but still my fav. is cricket.
may be i am not a health freak
@joshua_77 (612)
• India
6 Jan 07
while we play in football our blood circulation is very good in entire our whold body, so our health is improve
@rattle_snake212 (264)
• India
5 Jan 07
from fitness point of view football is definitely a better game.as u keep on running n so theres lot of sweating.it provides a good source of workout for all the players.
1 person likes this
@joshua_77 (612)
• India
6 Jan 07
yes what you say is perfectly correct while we play in football our blood circulation is very good condition..
it will improve our health
@addict (172)
• India
25 Jan 07
Football of course is game better for health or may be the best game. But cricket is more interesting one. even though watching cricket requires investment of a lot of time, still people invest there whole day in watching it, means there is something in it. both of the games are really good but as per as health is concern, football is no doubt a better exercise.
1 person likes this
@shravnann (32)
•
17 Aug 07
both the games gives as a good health.football make your body fit healthy than cricket, but cricket needs more stamina,it needs more concentration to paly the game and some techinal aspects also requried to play cricket.if u miss a few second while bating it will harm you or you will out of the game.football is good watching.
1 person likes this
@vignesh19 (607)
• India
8 Jan 07
Cricket
Cricket is a bat and ball sport, played between two teams of eleven players each. A cricket match is played on a grass field (which is usually roughly oval), in the centre of which is a flat strip of ground 22 yards (20.12 m) long, called a pitch. At each end of the pitch is a set of wooden stumps, called a wicket. A player from the fielding team (the bowler) propels a hard, fist-sized cork-centred leather ball from one wicket towards the other. The ball usually bounces once before reaching a player from the opposing team (the batsman), who defends the wicket from the ball with a wooden cricket bat. The batsman, if he or she does not get out, may then run between the wickets, exchanging ends with the other batsman (the "non-striker"), who has been standing in an inactive role near the bowler's wicket, to score runs. The other members of the bowler's team stand in various positions around the field as fielders. The match is won by the team that scores more runs.
@joshua_77 (612)
• India
9 Jan 07
I am asking about only which game is good for our health but here you give history of crucket why ? i am confusing with your reply any way i get some information from your reply
@joshua_77 (612)
• India
6 Jan 07
you are a good sports person i think you will be a great either cricketr or football person
@Bhuadi (97)
• India
2 Oct 07
Football is a two hour or a one hour game if i am not mistaken, whereas cricket its useally played for seven to eght hours(considering fifty ovbersa side.Both the games involves physical activity.Both the games are team games.Football involves mainly movement of legs whereas in cricket both hands and feet are made use of,be it bowling or batting, wicket keeping or even umpiring.In cricket players stand in the Sun for hours when it is sunny.One thing noticable between the two sports is that so far cricket matches have been stopped if ther is a huge downpour.Football matches on the other hand are played even in rain.
@joshua_77 (612)
• India
6 Jan 07
welcome friend ,hope cricket will come in your country later,but i also like football and all italian players
@hassanchop (820)
• United States
6 Jan 07
Both are good, but out of the two, I enjoy football (I'm assuming you're referring to American soccer, or British football) much more, reason being is because I can play it, and I've never played cricket, nor can I even follow along when I'm watchin it. It just looks like a weird, acid-tripped variation of baseball.
@joshua_77 (612)
• India
6 Jan 07
cricket is startedin england but now famous in india and pakistan ,srilanka hope one day american also play cricket, but i also like football than cricket
@jatindavey (128)
• United States
9 Jan 07
i think football is more good for health than cricket. in football u need to run a lot while only the batsmen have to run in cricket and bowlers too. the fielders just need to stand and wait and watch.
@joshua_77 (612)
• India
9 Jan 07
yes while playing cricket batsmen only active others are simply stand but in football every one should active and run here and there
@imranwajid (741)
• Germany
5 Jan 07
Yes Football is much better for health. There is a place for unfit players like David Boon and Ranatunga in Cricket but no one can imagine a fat player like them in football.
@adivisor (134)
• India
1 Mar 07
i think both the games r gud for health as well as play
a game is not about playing and staying healthy its a craze
as in india cricket is a big craze and to some its a religion.and outside india in other foriegn counries football is the game which most of the people would to play.
@disc_dude (33)
• India
30 Jan 07
cricket..........in cricket ur every body part is excersicing...
it makes ur bision sharp.........makes u a good grabber
