are you really a "knowledgable" fan??

@jay_85 (186)
India
January 8, 2007 4:39am CST
hello folks.. u all know that in our country,every person has an opinion on cricket.but my point is,do all of them really deserve to make such comments?i really feel that in india nt even 10% of the people really follow the game and are knowledgable about it.they dont make senseless criticism,neither do they indulge in gossiping.. the remaining people are of that kind who themsleves jump up and down with joy when they perform well and they make them superstars... few months down the line,if someone flops,may b a virender sehwag or sourav ganguly,or even sachin,they'll start shouting that these people should be axed from the team and new players should be tried... the recent return of sourav ganguly is a classical example,same is happening with virender sehwag and irfan pathan.\ plz keep me posted on ur views
3 responses
@usman400 (1587)
• Pakistan
8 Jan 07
Your poitns are soo valueable, look my rreplies in all cricket discussions that criticise in such a way, I am against this so called critisim, just on one soil, only in one series, ppl judge and give final comments about players this is not right the team does not need comments when they win, the only need is whe it looses unfortunatley this problem is with 80% audience of the world
@jay_85 (186)
• India
10 Jan 07
completely agree with you mate.. every man on the streets considers himself to be a genius and better skilled than those playin matches..hw to counter them??
• Pakistan
10 Jan 07
some people who have not the knowledge about cricket say that if team wins than it is not to worry that who is performing or not they think about the change in player when the team starts to lose matches. It is also good for the player to play well they get money for it and if they retain in the team than they will get more money. It increases pressure on the player if we are cricticizing them They are the players which are chosen from a large population so they are very good players
• India
8 Jan 07
no, it is not