love n then know or know n then love

hmmm...both r better,,,,the inference z I M IN LOVE..thtz always better dude no matter hw u luv..ur in luv n bein luved..thtz the greatest part of life.. cheers..bbye

Yes i think that u should know a person before loving him, coz what if u dont like the person or his behavior after u start loving him... It always has to be know before love.... otherwise its blind love

It can be just both in real life but I would prefer get to know first and follow by love.

in this world it is only love which sees nothing so it is impossible to love after knowing

I think you have to know a person to love them. How could you know if your feelings were genuine if you didn't know the person? I think that to say you love a person you don't know, i.e. haven't met and spent time with, means that you are looking at the 'outside package' and not the soul and nature of the person.

i think know and then love

It depends on the case we encountered. As long as we feel security with his background there is less thought of knowing him. If we feel the in-secured then we inquire about him and then only come to conclusion. But for love its the souls, that feel the righteousness for decision making.