Should the members be ranked or the discussion or maybe neither?
By aquariancore
@aquariancore (608)
United States
January 14, 2007 12:18pm CST
When they first appeared we all got an alert that MyLot was going to be a popularity contest. Now in a short period of time some who have bragged in offsite forums have systems in place to elevate their rankings and lower other people's rankings. So the game begins. I just want people to know I go to discussions that attract my attention and not the ranking number. No offense but there are some out there with ranks elevating with three word responses and poor discussions. I give my approval by acceptance in my friends group and checking my friend's discussion column. I think the rankings are are an idea with good intentions but with bad results.
1 response
@leedug (920)
• United States
14 Jan 07
That's horrible that people are doing that and then bragging about. Unfortunately, with every site, there are always going to be a few bad seeds. The majority of people here seem to be helpful and want to do the right thing. The reason I like the rankings is because it gives people the incentive not to post complete drivel everywhere, because they will end up getting a low ranking, thus not as many replies to their discussion. Hopefully all the honest members will pull together and make the rankings work like they should.
