Books vs. Movies -- Watch the movie or read the book first?
By nuttmeg
@nuttmeg (440)
United States
January 14, 2007 10:23pm CST
Just had a conversation with some friends as to whether or not they prefer to watch a movie first, or read the book that it's based off of beforehand. I thought it was pretty interesting to hear the different theories on it. I generally try to watch the movie and then read the book, unless the movie came out a way after the book did, only because I usually end up feeling pretty disappointed with the movie or find myself critiquing it more than I normally would, had I not read the book first.
For example, even though I otherwise liked it, I ended up being annoyed with the 4th Harry Potter movie because it felt so different from what I had previously read in the book, which is pretty typical for Hollywood. The same thing seems to happen with certain other movies, such as Da Vinci Code, which I just watched earlier today after having read and enjoyed the book back when it first came out in bookstores. On the other hand, there are times where I might not like a book that I've read, and end up appreciating it more after seeing the movie and being able to picture the characters from it in the book, such as with Lord of the Rings and a few of the Jane Austen books.
So I'm curious as to which you prefer and why.
4 people like this
29 responses
@gadheeraj (446)
• India
15 Jan 07
we definately gt more idea of the characterisations n hav a firm grip over the story if we read the books were as in a movie we just hav a glimpse of the story n characters..but movie has gt its own importance we definatley njoy more watching movie than studyin it
1 person likes this
@prettyarchitect (18)
• Philippines
15 Jan 07
i think it is better to read the book first because it is in detail and you have your own way of imagining your own version of your setting, character based on the story...although movie is more visual but sometimes the story is not given justice by the movie or the actors/actresses...or the highlights of the story.
1 person likes this
@nuttmeg (440)
• United States
15 Jan 07
gaheeraj - Very true. I do sometimes appreciate a movie for its sense of importance, even if it difference from the book somewhat. Lord of the Rings, for instance, wasn't exactly how the books were written, or even close to it in some parts, but I really did enjoy the movies. Sometimes, even the movies can be better than the book, if it's done right.
@nuttmeg (440)
• United States
15 Jan 07
prettyarchitect - I agree, the movies sometimes don't even begin to touch what's in a book usually, and it's great being able to come up with your own thoughts of a book's characters and the like. Of course, like I said, there are movies that helped me enjoy a book more once I read it again after watching the flick, but I usually prefer it the other way around.
1 person likes this
@Bartolin1980 (98)
• Ireland
15 Jan 07
Personally both do me fine, but a film-maker must do something special to put a new spin on something which already exists in another form, something which you haven't done by just copying the topic created a few days ago by another person
1 person likes this
@nuttmeg (440)
• United States
16 Jan 07
Um, right. I actually always try check to make sure I'm not dragging up something that's already been discussed in a similar fashion by using that nifty search feature at the top, because I personally can't stand seeing others doing it intentionally myself, and never saw anything come up. Ever think that maybe sometimes people come up with similar ideas without the intent of blatantly copying someone else? Afterall, topics are bound to come up again and again, since there are only so many things to talk about. Songwriters, authors, what have you do it all the time. This was triggered by seeing Code, as mentioned above, after my mother rented it off Netflix. Funny world, isn't it? Lucky for everyone here at mylot, my other 6 whopping discussions that have been made here don't seem to fall along those lines--of course, maybe you'll think I just wasn't ambitious enough until today to not come up with thoughts of my own. A bright person might otherwise think I only post what's on my mind or feel like discussing at the moment, such as this topic. Thanks for non-accusational part of your post, however.
@emeraldisle (13139)
• United States
15 Jan 07
Well normally I'll watch the movie first. That way I won't be judging it by the book. Often times the book is better or has different details. I find that if I see the movie first then when I read the book I can enjoy both still, usually. There are a few exceptions to that. There are a few were they were so different that I had to judge one of them better then another. There are a few I did read the books first, Harry Potter is one of them and I agree the 4th movie did leave a lot out.
@nuttmeg (440)
• United States
16 Jan 07
Same here, for the most part. And I also had a heck of a time deciding if I wanted to continue to read the Potter books, because of this, or wait to see the movies first, but it takes so long for the movies to come out and I have no willpower lol. I'm hoping that they don't butcher the 5th book, but I won't hold my breath.
1 person likes this
@Chapman15 (1492)
• United States
15 Jan 07
I like both... I really think that if I see the movie first it ruins the book, and if I read the book it ruins the movie! Especially when it's a mystery type of movie/book that you keep guessing what's going to happen or who did what, and it's lost if you have prior kowledge before viewing/reading either!
All in all, I guess I don't care which way I see/read it, because atleast I'll know what people are talking about lol!
1 person likes this
@romyrsiwala06 (99)
• Philippines
15 Jan 07
Most of the time there's a big difference in the story and presentation of story in the book and in the movie. I am a visual person so i like watching movie. But there are books that I like reading because the adjectives are great. You can visualize everything as if you the writer can bring you to the scene. well in the movie you can finish the whole story in 1 to 3 hours in a book you can finish it in 1 to 7 days.
1 person likes this
@nuttmeg (440)
• United States
15 Jan 07
I agree. Sometimes it is nice to be able to have the story, or at least parts of it, finished in just a few hours with some visual aid, while other times it's basically just nicer to be able to think for yourself and gain the whole perspective of what the original author was trying to portray. I guess I'm in limbo lol.
@Raj119 (225)
• United States
15 Jan 07
Rarely have I found a movie more interesting than a well-written book. "The Godfather" is that rare exception where a film-going experience supersedes the reading experience. For the most part though, I would definitely read the book before I watch the film version. Characters are simply etched out in more detail not to mention the story is much more precise and thorough when you read the book.
1 person likes this
@melody1011 (1663)
• India
15 Jan 07
I love reading and would definetely like to read the book before I see the movie. The one time i did watch the movie first (i watched Dirk Pitts - Sahara) I was soo disappointed when I read the book as I realised the movie left out a lot of important parts of the book. I just love to see a book being turned into a movie.
So, i'd prefer to read the book and then watch the movie
1 person likes this
@nuttmeg (440)
• United States
15 Jan 07
My mom's the same way and I guess I can be that way too sometimes, I guess it just depends on the book or the movie. Not every movie turns out to be a dissapointment if I happen to read the book first, just a good portion of them unfortunately lol. Thanks for you thoughts!
1 person likes this
@nehakalley4 (1918)
• United States
16 Jan 07
I prefer to read the book first as I can use my own imagination in understanding the things and there are many things which are not shown in the movie as was written in the book so I try to find the mistakes or the misses in the movie more particularly Harry Potter.
1 person likes this
@brokentia (10389)
• United States
22 Jan 07
I have a bad habit of reading the book first.
I guess my view on it is that I want to see how the author protrays the story.
I would rather read the book and picture it in my head uing my imagination and the authors words. Then, I like to watch the movie to see if they producers were able to capture what I was able to imagine through the same words.
Sadly, I found many movies take out parts of the book that I me, made the book more enjoyable.
Such as, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. It was a really good book AND a really good movie. But I was really disappointed that they took Dobby out of the movie! Dobby was the one that gave Harry the Gillyweed. Dobby is the one that overheard the conversation about the effects of the gillyweed. Also, in the book, Harry and his friends went into the kitchen and it showed how all the food appeared in the dinning hall. I loved it! It answered questions that I always wondered. Do people actually cook he meal or was it magickally prepared?
Or what about Series of Unfortunate Events...my kids were reading the books and my daughter wanted me to read them too before the movie came out. But sure enough, I really hated the movie! The movie was created from the first three books and the whole darn thing was mixed up out of order! How could they take thre books and mix it up like that? AND give it a different ending? *sigh*
But I still prefer the books over the movies. I guess I would rather see the book in my mind the way the author intended it. The author put so much hard work into writing the words and story, I think it then deserves to know how it was written. And if he movie is disappointing, that is the producers and production company.
Oh! And I agree with you about the DaVinci Code also. I was sooooo disappointed in the movie!
1 person likes this
@thatcrazyqbanita (3312)
• United States
25 Jan 07
always read the book first than the movie. i believe the book has more depth, since it is indeed what the movie is based on.
1 person likes this
@Cappuccino (140)
• United States
15 Jan 07
for me i would like to watch tv then read books if i have not enough time . and i think if you read books first then you will get more funny in it. because you can inmagine it by yourself at first
1 person likes this
@amaine (2027)
• Philippines
16 Jan 07
i prefer to read the book first , , because , , it's more detailed rather than what they are in the movie , , i don't know , , but i enjoy the story more when i have read it from the book , , plus , , there are some movies that you won't be able to understand except if you already read the book , , :-) reading is so fun!
1 person likes this
@xelissa (776)
• New Zealand
16 Jan 07
I usually tend to read the movie then watch the movie, but then I get disappointed so now I watch the movie first and see what the books has to say. Generally the books are more detailed and create a vivid imagination in your mind than watching a block of pictures that moves and tell a story. Books has insights to what the person feels, smells, hears, touches and you can imagine unlinke movies.
1 person likes this
@anex84 (465)
• Bulgaria
25 Jan 07
The book is easily better.I won't spoil it for you by telling you the differences if you haven't read it, but generally all books are better than the movies because you have more time to develop characters. The readers imagination plays more of a role in the story so there's a personal investment by the reader, and you don't have the problem of actors, who are good sometimes but many times don't truly reflect the author's intent. The thing that bothers me about this series as a movie is that the Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe was the best book out of a seven book series.Where do the filmmakers go from here? I don't think it's going to end up being as good of a franchise as Harry Potter (which seemed to be made for the movies).
@dakota240 (71)
• United States
16 Jan 07
The book is always more exciting then the movie. In the movie you don't get to use your imagination like you do with a book.
Movies are limited on how much time you get to know the characters, where with a book the author can take as long as he or she wants to introduce the characters as long as they keep it interesting.
1 person likes this
@sweetgirl_k1 (3972)
• United States
16 Jan 07
I watch the movie before I read the book. That way I understand the characters more.
1 person likes this
@Mecboy (1050)
• United States
16 Jan 07
I think the movie, Sometimes if you read the book first,they say the book has extra as well, But if read the book first, you might like the characters, but you might not have interest in the scenes, And get bored in the movie knowing that in you imagine how the characters look.
The movie turns out different, and you say what? he or she dosn't look like that? If you watch the movie first you might have more fun in the book. depends on you
seems the same. But the movie seems better to me, I mean you and your friends can see it together
1 person likes this
@Prowell (71)
• Australia
16 Jan 07
Watching a movie we rely on how other people see the plot and the characters. When reading, we use our imagination and it can be much more rich in details and colourful. A book and a movie can be like two different things - depending on the script and emphases a writer or a film director want to make.
1 person likes this