do u think cricket is time consuming?
By kshameed
@kshameed (174)
India
January 18, 2007 2:05pm CST
if u see cricket takes more than half day. whereas football takes less than three hours.i feel the one day matches over limit should be made 20 overs instead of 50 overs. 20-20 matches only to be played. and test match is taking 5days, its time consuming. we people wasting our precious time by watching this. i wish here after all the matches should be 20-20 matches. what do u all say?
4 responses
@gaurav_indian_20 (513)
• India
18 Jan 07
yah, cricket is time consuming. it takes around 7hrs to complete...it s a very long game & most of the time i never get the chance to see full match due to its length,,,,20-20 of cricket is better idea coz its a short game, hav full entertainment,,,,
@yogesh2443 (13)
• India
18 Jan 07
according to me
cricket n football r both good games
but wat happens is that in football is is d matter of just 90 min
after that d match is ovr
but in cricket there remains n exictement that wat wil happen after 1 hr in one day matches n 2marrow wat wil happen in test matches.these thoughts come 2 ur mind
which keeps u in touch with d game but football once 90 min r over all foget about it
from yogesh
see u tommarow