I love you but I'm sorry your kids can't live with us?

@manong05 (5027)
Philippines
January 22, 2007 9:27pm CST
This is what a man told his lover so the woman finally decided to put her 2 children under the care of her parents, afraid that she might lose the man and hope that eventually the guy will start to like the kids? Do you consider this an immature decision? Put in her place, will you do the same for love?
4 people like this
6 responses
@Sissygrl (10912)
• Canada
23 Jan 07
I dont care if the man was dipped in gold and coated with chocolate! i would not give up my kids for anyone. Screw that! there are other men in the world who would like to be dads and if i couldnt find one then i'd rather be alone then to give up my kids. if you know this woman you should slap some sense into her!
2 people like this
@manong05 (5027)
• Philippines
23 Jan 07
Yes I know her, she lives across the street where I live. Unfortunately, you can not talk sensibly with her, always on the defensive position.
1 person likes this
• Canada
23 Jan 07
In the words of Borat, "HIGH FIVE!". You got that one right for sure.
@candygurl24 (1880)
• Canada
23 Jan 07
I would do alot for love, and I mean alot, but overall, I love my kids more than any man that could ever walk this earth! He's got her right under his thumb now, he's obviously a control freak to even be screwed up enough to suggest to a woman that she needs to choose between him and her kids, and head problems...not to overly insult, this is just my opinion, but what in the hell is wrong with that woman? That is the most irresponsible decision that anyone could ever make. If there are bags out on my front step, they are his, no my kids'.
1 person likes this
• Canada
23 Jan 07
Sorry for the typo..should read; If there are bags out on my front step, they are his, NOT my kids'.
@manong05 (5027)
• Philippines
23 Jan 07
I like your last sentence. Very graphic way of ending your explanation. Nicely put.
1 person likes this
• Canada
23 Jan 07
Thanks. I figured it just drove the point home :)
@emeraldisle (13139)
• United States
23 Jan 07
Not only is it an immature decision it is a selfish one on the part of the woman. She brought those kids into this world, decided to raise them and they are dependent upon her for love and all that goes with it. To turn them away because of a lover is just selfish on the part of the woman and you know if for some reason it doesn't work out with him she'll want the kids back. That's putting them through hell for her own personal agenda. Personally I don't think much of the man for asking her to choose that way either. He knew when he got involved that she had children. If he didn't want to be involved with the kids then he shouldn't have gotten involved with her. He's just as much to blame and just as selfish.
@coffeechat (1961)
• New Zealand
23 Jan 07
This is often a dilemma for a single parent. The same could happen to a man you know. The relationship between a new lover and children from previous relationship(s) could become stressful. I have seen this happen so often among friends and relatives that it is almost scary to see the effects of separation and the forming of subsequent alliances on children. I suppose in many Asian, African and Latin American countries the option of shipping the children to their grandparents is quite possible. Among the developing countries the spirit of family and supportiveness is often very unselfish. While I am not suggesting that parents in the developed world would not take in children, it is less likely that they will. Often sending the children to their grandparents is a great thing for many children because grandparents provide a different kind of love and care than what a solo parent can. In summary, that would be a great thing for the children, parent as well as the new partner. Sending the kids to parents is a very mature and selfless decision on the part of the single parent. I suppose, depending on the age of the children their views would be taken into account as well.
@manong05 (5027)
• Philippines
23 Jan 07
You have a very positive outlook. Will you not question in any way the feelings of your partner in telling you that he doesn't want your kids to be with you? even doubt, perhaps?
• New Zealand
23 Jan 07
If the children are older and mature sending them to a good boarding / residential school is a great option. Some of the best schools in the world are Residential - though they are frightfully expensive. Perhaps the new lover who articulates the removal of the children should pay the costs!
• Canada
23 Jan 07
In Canada, us single parents look for mates that would love our children, not turn them away, and if we come across a man/woman that does not accept our children, they are not given a chance. As for it being mature, in my eyes, mature would be taking care of what is yours. That is YOUR child, YOUR responsibility. If you are only giving your children up for a man, that is a very immature and extremely selfish thing to do. Think of how the kids must feel, oh well mommy loves that man more than us..forget that one. My kids know who loves them more than any man in this world.
2 people like this
@celray (141)
• United States
23 Jan 07
no if he love her for real then the kids will be welcome too
1 person likes this
@XxAngelxX (2830)
• Canada
23 Jan 07
I find this an incredibly immature decision. I would not give my kids up for anybody in this world! I think the man was very immature too to tell this to the woman he supposedly loved. If a man can't love my kids, then he certainly doesn't love me as they are part of me.
1 person likes this
@manong05 (5027)
• Philippines
23 Jan 07
It doesn't mean he doesn't love your kids, he just wanted to start married life the way other people do, enjoying the company of each other alone.
• Canada
23 Jan 07
In my opinion, someone wanting to spend the first part of married life like most do should find someone without children. And if they fall in love with someone that has children, well it's a package deal...plain and simple. You take all or you have none. That is the only mature and responsible way!