who should be severly dealt.one who gives bribe or one who takes them?

Both should be dealt with severely. They are both committing a crime. If people didn't accept bribes, no bribery would take place, and if people didn't tempt by offering bribes, no bribery would take place.

I would say that people who take bribes should be dealt with good. They are the ones who corrupt the societies. If a police personnel says to you that give me 100 rupees then I will let you go otherwise I will arrest you, what chances to you have to get away without paying the bribes. So I would say that the people who take bribes should be punished. If they don't take bribes then there will be no one to pay bribes.

I think both are gulity equally but yes the bribe is asked always by a person who has some kind of authority and control so naturally you will punish the person in power severly then only thsi problem can be rooted out. The one giving bribe is doing it to gget his work done so naturally some kind of punishment shopuld be given to him but after looking at the case properly. I am speaking of the contractors here who have made bribe as a way of getting what they want. You can not punish common man who is stuck in to the system trying to get hisd file cleared from clutches of the red tape..

i think both should be punished.. the person who takes bribe should be punished because he is being paid and still demands for more but the person to be severely dealt is the person who gives because if we keep giving people keep asking for more.. if we stop than asking will automatically stop

Both shall receive the same weight of judgment befor God.God's word say Not only evil doers will be punished but also those who take pleasure in what evil doers are doing