muralitharan or shane warne

shane warne....he is the legend....murli has a bend arm..he has flaws in his actions.

i think shane warne is the better spinner though murali has a better avg and will get more wickets coz see the number of matches murali has played in spinning tracks and number of wickets he ahs got against bangladeh or zimbabwe....shane had to grow up in fast bowlers tracks yet he did well and he is the one who has bowled the ball of the century to gatting...........shane warne rules followed by kumble then comes mutthia

shane warne is no doubt the best spinner in the world.. he can turn the bowl extremely well and has made fool of the batsmen a number of times

As per my choice Shane is better than Murli. The bowling action of Murli is suspected. Yes, I still blv. that his action is not clean. Whereas Shane is a clean bowler and think he got all the wickets with compete with other australian bowler like McGrath etc. Murli will break all the records of Shane, but he is a suspected bowler.

Definetly Muralitharan there is no doubt about that.

I think Murali

i think warne is better

Muralitharan is the best spinner and he will turn the match to his side by his tremondous bowling.

i think its shane the better

Shane Warne is the best spinner in the World

yes everybody says shanewane is the best spinner. i also agree with them. he is an excellent spinner. i couldnt saw any spinner like him.

I think Shane Warne simply because unlike Murali he has had to share wickets with other great bowlers like Mcgrath and Gillespie, and yet has still managed to consistently outdo them. Also as a natural competitor he is head and shoulders above anyone .

Muralitharan

Shane warne is the better bowler, motivator and team man. He was the one the aussies looked forward to when the chips were down and he could galvanise the whole team into action by his terrific attitude and superlative bowling. For sure he is streets ahead of murali , who is reticent by comparison

shane according to me is a better player as spinner because he claimed mostly top order batsmen and also in all kinds of pitches whereas murli has more tailenders to his name and also most of his wickets as are in the subcontinent where the grounds spin friendly so shane is a better bowler than him on any given condition.

both are very good in their own way and it is difficult to compare them in my personal opinion il go in for muralitharan he has health problems but still has overcome an come out this good