cheating

A gut feeling is proof enough for me, but who doesn't like to have substantial evidence to back it up? I'm very intuitive and analytical, so I'd find out for sure and then confront with proof!

If you confront him, he will probably deny it. The best approach might be to just ask. By catching him off guard, he might blurt it out. Don't count on it though. The best thing to do, if you can afford it, is hire a private detective to follow him and get the goods on him. It would be hard for him to deny it when confronted with photos!

I just cannot bear the mistrust. I immdly blow back and do not excuse him.

Do you have any evidence at all or just suspicions at this point in time? It would be better to try and talk to him when you are calm rather than 'confront' the person. Good luck

I would wait to confront them until I had more evidence to support my thoughts, otherwise they just might start being more careful so as though not to get caught, that and I would want to be sure so I didnt falsely accuse them of cheating.

well confrontations could let him have an advantage of denial once you dont have the evidence to nail him down.I know how it feels seen someone you trust cheat on you."You would definately want to nail him down, expect him to accept his mistakes and promise he would never do that again". To be candid you would be wrong if you take that approach.Find some more evidence, lay it bare to him when he's relaxed and see what he does... Good luck

You should preobably wait until you have a little proof, but I couldnt wait. Id have to get it out

its always good to just ask. Honesty is the best policy. I always give me husband three chances, to come clean...if i have any evidence, and if he doesn't than I confront him. But i always tell him, i'd rather have you tell me whats going on, rather than someone else. Whenever i confront him i tend to be really pissed, and get stressed for no reason, so I'd just ask him if theres anything that you need to know about, if he says no-then confront him.

the best way is to wait for more evidence.immediately confronting them is not good.if you have enough evidence you can always confront them later.

wen we come to know that some one is cheating.... we have to confront them immediately..... why to wait for more evidence bcoz it wil be too late under many circumstances.....

I would wait until there is more proof because if you confront them without any proof they will just deny it. Try a private investigator.

I beleive in waiting till i get complete evidence..before u blame someone..

i would say ....that u should wait till u get more evidence ....coz if its just a misunderstanding then u may even cost a good relation ....

waiting is a good decition because he can be innocent.... sometime this kind of misconcepts also gets in to ur mind ...because of ur failure or ur attachment or concept regarding that person

With Evidence i will prove it

i'll wait till i have more evidence and firts make sure that they are really cheating and wee are not jumping into false conclusions!!!!!!!!..... then we can confront them and beat the hell outta em!

I would wait until I had complete proof so I could let him know that I KNOW he was lying if he denies it!

If it was me I would try to find the evidence first. Because you just never know. I would hate to accuse someone of something and find out it was not true.

I would support him if he/she is my closest friend.

I would wait until I had solid proof. But don't just look for proof in everything they say or do, just be aware of what is going on around you. When you have something fairly solid, bring it up.