Human boundries
By raj_k4101
@raj_k4101 (65)
India
7 responses
@researchscholar (2218)
• India
11 Oct 06
yes you are correct,
No countries,
No continents,
No religions
Then there will be no wars
@raj_k4101 (65)
• India
11 Oct 06
thanks scholar.
you really sound like a scholar.
but human always wants something to fight, i think that's why they like boundries.If natural distance is not there they creat manmade boundries to develop barriers. so that new disputes can emerge
@HomerBundy (1325)
• United States
11 Oct 06
good question...i really have no idea why man/woman has created boundaries for ourselves...
1 person likes this
@raj_k4101 (65)
• India
11 Oct 06
thanks for response.
can you please explain why have you talked about only man/woman boundries and not about battles etc.
is there anything personal in it
@sirensanssmile (3764)
• Netherlands
24 Oct 06
Because people are different and at some point in the past cultures started. Groups of people finding themselves together in an area and then building domains. These domains sprouted up all over and it has been this way ever since. It didn't stop because we have established countries think about the new countries that popped up when the USSR fell or Czechoslovakia split into two.... It goes on but the reason is that is what has become ingrained in the human being's subconscious.
@raj_k4101 (65)
• India
17 Dec 06
even in existing countries lots of cultures r existing, so it means they can also be divided again n again. up to what extant we can justify these teretorial dicriminations
@raj_k4101 (65)
• India
17 Dec 06
yes u r truely right, but isn't here any solution to this mentality of human seems to be robbed by just few ill minded people
@beautifulceiling (1300)
• United States
3 Dec 06
And then on top of all that we develop patriotism which only means that your little fenced off corner of the world is better than everyone else's little fenced off corner of the world because you happened to have been born there.
@raj_k4101 (65)
• India
17 Dec 06
patriotism for one country. cann't it be for whole world as a single country. cann't we have such a broad mentality to consider all as our own
@AKRao24 (27424)
• India
15 Dec 06
Basically human being is the most evolved animal in the world. Having evolved from caveman to todays man, he has seen many things and learnt many things. He learnt how to tame wild animals to make them domestic ones and then he learnt how to and where to use them for his personal benefit. Then he learnt how to cultivate lands and grow crops. He invented making fire. Thus gradually after each invention he has grown stronger and stronger. Then, once the bare necessities are met with then the question of power has raised its head and the strongest of the group has started as the head. Then naturally some one to oppose the head and formatio of groups, Then quarrels, battles, wars, divisions of human beings, lands and formation of boundaries. All have been created by human being only !
@raj_k4101 (65)
• India
17 Dec 06
lust of human can never be satisfied. but shouldn't it be for betterment only. all invention etc. for betterment of all. shouldn't we think that this enemity and all is not the will of maximum people. it's just for few and they are commanding of whole world to wrong direction and all r following them foolishly
@maheshraor (559)
• India
24 Oct 06
for thinking aboiut this we need empathy...i mean we need to be in our ancestors shoes..n think like them..if then the country wasnt divided(physical bpundries) then we would have a different atmosphere now... but one thing tat holds true is that we r just increasing the boundaries once created be it physical or mental...i mean discrimination among ppl based on their caste ect...as u said if it was a single owrld without any countries there wouldnt have been wars on acqusitions but tat wouldnt have stopped fights ag\mong individuals ...all r susceptible a certain degree of jealousy, hatred etc...n another thing is that without the so called physical boubndaries ...u u think we would have known all ppl? for eg a person froma small country(not financially well) has done something gr8..but the person would be kbown isnatantly too all. but if there were no countries ..n say abt a dozen ppl have accomplished the thing then there woulldnt be any significance to the achivement...
@raj_k4101 (65)
• India
17 Dec 06
do u think that just for recognition these division is justified. it hardly matters whether u know all or they know u.main thing is that how much peace we can establish all around as per one's capasity